• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用羟基磷灰石水泥对失败的椎弓根螺钉进行翻修。生物力学分析。

Revision of failed pedicle screws using hydroxyapatite cement. A biomechanical analysis.

作者信息

Yerby S A, Toh E, McLain R F

机构信息

Veterans Affairs Rehabilitation and Research Design Center, Palo Alto, California, USA.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998 Aug 1;23(15):1657-61. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199808010-00008.

DOI:10.1097/00007632-199808010-00008
PMID:9704372
Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

The biomechanical influence of in situ setting hydroxyapatite cement was examined for use in pedicle screw revision surgery. Pull-out testing of control and pedicle screws augmented with hydroxyapatite cement was performed in human cadaver vertebrae.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the immediate effect of using hydroxyapatite cement to augment revision pedicle screws after failure of the primary pedicle screw fixation.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The potential problems associated with using polymethylmethacrylate to augment revision pedicular instrumentation have prompted the search for other solutions. The introduction of resorbable hydroxyapatite pastes may have provided new biocompatible solutions for pedicle screw revision.

METHODS

Ten human cadaver vertebrae were instrumented with 6.0-mm pedicle screws in each pedicle. The screws were loaded to failure in axial tension (pull-out). The failed pedicles then were instrumented with 7.0-mm pedicle screws, either augmented with hydroxyapatite cement or nonaugmented, which also were loaded to failure. Finally, the nonaugmented 7.0-mm screw hole was reinstrumented with a hydroxyapatite cement-augmented, 7.0-mm pedicle screw and loaded to failure.

RESULTS

The pull-out strength of the 7.0-mm, hydroxyapatite cement-augmented screws was 325% (P = 2.9 x 10(-5)) of that of the 6.0-mm control screws, whereas the strength of the 7.0-mm nonaugmented screws was only 73% (P = 2.0 x 10(-2)) of that of the 6.0-mm control screws. The 7.0-mm screws augmented with hydroxyapatite cement also were able to salvage 7.0-mm pull-out sites to 384% (P = 6.9E-5) of the pull-out strength of the 7.0-mm nonaugmented screws.

CONCLUSIONS

Hydroxyapatite cement may be a mechanically viable alternative to polymethyl methacrylate for augmenting revision pedicular instrumentation and should be considered for future experimental, animal, and clinical testing.

摘要

研究设计

研究原位植入羟基磷灰石骨水泥在椎弓根螺钉翻修手术中的生物力学影响。在人类尸体椎骨上对未增强的对照椎弓根螺钉和增强了羟基磷灰石骨水泥的椎弓根螺钉进行拔出试验。

目的

确定在初次椎弓根螺钉固定失败后,使用羟基磷灰石骨水泥增强翻修椎弓根螺钉的即时效果。

背景资料总结

使用聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯增强翻修椎弓根器械相关的潜在问题促使人们寻找其他解决方案。可吸收羟基磷灰石糊剂的引入可能为椎弓根螺钉翻修提供了新的生物相容性解决方案。

方法

在10具人类尸体椎骨的每个椎弓根中植入6.0毫米的椎弓根螺钉。将螺钉在轴向张力(拔出)下加载至失效。然后在失败的椎弓根中植入7.0毫米的椎弓根螺钉,一种增强了羟基磷灰石骨水泥,另一种未增强,同样将它们加载至失效。最后,在未增强的7.0毫米螺钉孔中重新植入增强了羟基磷灰石骨水泥的7.0毫米椎弓根螺钉并加载至失效。

结果

7.0毫米增强了羟基磷灰石骨水泥的螺钉的拔出强度是6.0毫米对照螺钉拔出强度的325%(P = 2.9×10⁻⁵),而7.0毫米未增强螺钉的强度仅是6.0毫米对照螺钉强度的73%(P = 2.0×10⁻²)。增强了羟基磷灰石骨水泥的7.0毫米螺钉还能够将7.0毫米拔出部位的强度恢复到7.0毫米未增强螺钉拔出强度的384%(P = 6.9E - 5)。

结论

对于增强翻修椎弓根器械,羟基磷灰石骨水泥在力学上可能是聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯的可行替代物,应考虑在未来进行实验、动物和临床试验。

相似文献

1
Revision of failed pedicle screws using hydroxyapatite cement. A biomechanical analysis.使用羟基磷灰石水泥对失败的椎弓根螺钉进行翻修。生物力学分析。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998 Aug 1;23(15):1657-61. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199808010-00008.
2
Restoration of pedicle screw fixation with an in situ setting calcium phosphate cement.使用原位凝固磷酸钙骨水泥修复椎弓根螺钉固定。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 Aug 1;22(15):1696-705. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199708010-00003.
3
Revision of cannulated and perforated cement-augmented pedicle screws: a biomechanical study in human cadavers.空心钉和带孔骨水泥增强椎弓根螺钉翻修:人体尸体的生物力学研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Sep 1;35(19):E932-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c6ec60.
4
Primary pedicle screw augmentation in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae: biomechanical analysis of pedicle fixation strength.骨质疏松性腰椎的初次椎弓根螺钉强化:椎弓根固定强度的生物力学分析
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 May 1;32(10):1077-83. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000261566.38422.40.
5
Biomechanical Comparisons of Pull Out Strengths After Pedicle Screw Augmentation with Hydroxyapatite, Calcium Phosphate, or Polymethylmethacrylate in the Cadaveric Spine.尸体脊柱中使用羟基磷灰石、磷酸钙或聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯进行椎弓根螺钉强化后拔出强度的生物力学比较
World Neurosurg. 2015 Jun;83(6):976-81. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.01.056. Epub 2015 Mar 10.
6
Effect of the degree of osteoporosis on the biomechanical anchoring strength of the sacral pedicle screws: an in vitro comparison between unaugmented bicortical screws and polymethylmethacrylate augmented unicortical screws.骨质疏松程度对骶骨椎弓根螺钉生物力学锚固强度的影响:未增强双皮质螺钉与聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯增强单皮质螺钉的体外比较。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Sep 1;35(19):E925-31. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c5fb21.
7
Carbonated apatite cement augmentation of pedicle screw fixation in the lumbar spine.碳酸化磷灰石骨水泥增强腰椎椎弓根螺钉固定
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 Dec 1;22(23):2716-23. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199712010-00003.
8
Augmentation of pedicle screw fixation strength using an injectable calcium phosphate cement as a function of injection timing and method.使用可注射磷酸钙骨水泥增强椎弓根螺钉固定强度与注射时机和方法的关系。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Jun 1;29(11):E212-6. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200406010-00020.
9
A biomechanical cadaveric analysis of polymethylmethacrylate-augmented pedicle screw fixation.聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯增强椎弓根螺钉固定的生物力学尸体分析
J Neurosurg Spine. 2007 Jul;7(1):47-53. doi: 10.3171/SPI-07/07/047.
10
Effect of augmentation techniques on the failure of pedicle screws under cranio-caudal cyclic loading.在头尾向循环加载下,增强技术对椎弓根螺钉失效的影响。
Eur Spine J. 2017 Jan;26(1):181-188. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-3904-3. Epub 2015 Mar 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Biomechanical Study of 3 Osteoconductive Materials Applied in Pedicle Augmentation and Revision for Osteoporotic Vertebrae: Allograft Bone Particles, Calcium Phosphate Cement, Demineralized Bone Matrix.三种应用于骨质疏松性椎体椎弓根强化与翻修的骨传导材料的生物力学研究:同种异体骨颗粒、磷酸钙骨水泥、脱矿骨基质。
Neurospine. 2023 Dec;20(4):1407-1420. doi: 10.14245/ns.2346760.380. Epub 2023 Dec 31.
2
Reinforcement of Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation with Hydroxyapatite Granules in Patients with Osteoporotic Spine: Biomechanical Performance and Clinical Outcomes.羟磷灰石颗粒增强骨质疏松脊柱经皮椎弓根螺钉固定的生物力学性能和临床疗效。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Apr 23;58(5):579. doi: 10.3390/medicina58050579.
3
Innovation of Surgical Techniques for Screw Fixation in Patients with Osteoporotic Spine.
骨质疏松性脊柱患者螺钉固定手术技术的创新
J Clin Med. 2022 May 4;11(9):2577. doi: 10.3390/jcm11092577.
4
Revision pedicle screws with impaction bone grafting: a case series.翻修椎弓根螺钉结合嵌压植骨术:病例系列
J Spine Surg. 2021 Sep;7(3):344-353. doi: 10.21037/jss-20-684.
5
Enhancing percutaneous pedicle screw fixation with hydroxyapatite granules: A biomechanical study using an osteoporotic bone model.羟磷灰石颗粒增强经皮椎弓根螺钉固定:一种骨质疏松骨模型的生物力学研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 26;14(9):e0223106. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223106. eCollection 2019.
6
Pull out Strength of Dual Outer Diameter Pedicle Screws Compared to Uncemented and Cemented Standard Pedicle Screws: A Biomechanical in vitro Study.与非骨水泥和骨水泥标准椎弓根螺钉相比,双外径椎弓根螺钉的拔出强度:一项体外生物力学研究。
Orthop Surg. 2017 May;9(2):229-236. doi: 10.1111/os.12322. Epub 2017 May 26.
7
Osseodensification for enhancement of spinal surgical hardware fixation.骨密度增高术增强脊柱外科内固定物固定效果。
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2017 May;69:275-281. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.01.020. Epub 2017 Jan 13.
8
Pull-out strength of cemented solid versus fenestrated pedicle screws in osteoporotic vertebrae.骨质疏松性椎体中骨水泥强化实心椎弓根螺钉与开窗椎弓根螺钉的拔出强度
Bone Joint Res. 2016 Sep;5(9):419-26. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.59.2000580.
9
Clinical efficacy of bone cement augmented screw fixation for the severe osteoporotic spine.骨水泥增强螺钉固定治疗重度骨质疏松性脊柱的临床疗效
Korean J Spine. 2012 Jun;9(2):79-84. doi: 10.14245/kjs.2012.9.2.79. Epub 2012 Jun 30.
10
Balancing rigidity and safety of pedicle screw fixation via a novel expansion mechanism in a severely osteoporotic model.通过一种新型扩张机制在严重骨质疏松模型中平衡椎弓根螺钉固定的刚性和安全性。
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:318405. doi: 10.1155/2015/318405. Epub 2015 Feb 1.