Funke G, Peters K, Aravena-Roman M
Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Zürich, CH-8028 Zürich, Switzerland.
J Clin Microbiol. 1998 Sep;36(9):2439-42. doi: 10.1128/JCM.36.9.2439-2442.1998.
In a stress test, the recently introduced RapID CB Plus system (Remel Inc. [formerly Innovative Diagnostic Systems], Norcross, Ga.) was challenged with a diverse set of gram-positive rods comprising 345 strains of coryneform bacteria and 33 strains of Listeria spp. representing a total of 49 different taxa. Overall, within 4 h, the system correctly identified 80.9% of the strains on the species level and 12.2% of the strains on the genus level. Only 3.7% strains were misidentified, and for 3.2% of the strains no identification was provided. Difficulties with the system were mainly due to occasional uncertainties in reading reactions for acid production from carbohydrates and, to a lesser extent, aminopeptidase reactions. It is concluded that the system may also perform well under the conditions of a routine clinical laboratory.
在一项压力测试中,最近推出的RapID CB Plus系统(Remel公司[原创新诊断系统公司],佐治亚州诺克罗斯)接受了一组多样的革兰氏阳性杆菌的测试,其中包括345株棒状杆菌和33株李斯特菌属菌株,代表了总共49个不同的分类单元。总体而言,在4小时内,该系统在种水平上正确鉴定了80.9%的菌株,在属水平上正确鉴定了12.2%的菌株。只有3.7%的菌株被错误鉴定,3.2%的菌株未给出鉴定结果。该系统的困难主要是由于在读取碳水化合物产酸反应时偶尔存在不确定性,以及在较小程度上由于氨肽酶反应存在不确定性。得出的结论是,该系统在常规临床实验室条件下也可能表现良好。