• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

事故与不确定性下的决策制定:四种模型的比较

Accidents and Decision Making under Uncertainty: A Comparison of Four Models.

作者信息

Barkan R, Zohar D, Erev I

机构信息

Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, 32000, Israel

出版信息

Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1998 May;74(2):118-44. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2772.

DOI:10.1006/obhd.1998.2772
PMID:9705816
Abstract

Heinrich's (1931) classical study implies that most industrial accidents can be characterized as a probabilistic result of human error. The present research quantifies Heinrich's observation and compares four descriptive models of decision making in the abstracted setting. The suggested quantification utilizes signal detection theory (Green & Swets, 1966). It shows that Heinrich's observation can be described as a probabilistic signal detection task. In a controlled experiment, 90 decision makers participated in 600 trials of six safety games. Each safety game was a numerical example of the probabilistic SDT abstraction of Heinrich's proposition. Three games were designed under a frame of gain to represent perception of safe choice as costless, while the other three were designed under a frame of loss to represent perception of safe choice as costly. Probabilistic penalty for Miss was given at three different levels (1, .5, .1). The results showed that decisions tended initially to be risky and that experience led to safer behavior. As the probability of being penalized was lowered decisions became riskier and the learning process was impaired. The results support the cutoff reinforcement learning model suggested by Erev et al. (1995). The hill-climbing learning model (Busemeyer & Myung, 1992) was partially supported. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed. Copyright 1998 Academic Press.

摘要

海因里希(1931年)的经典研究表明,大多数工业事故可被视为人类错误导致的概率性结果。本研究对海因里希的观察进行了量化,并在抽象情境中比较了四种决策描述模型。所建议的量化方法运用了信号检测理论(格林和斯韦茨,1966年)。结果表明,海因里希的观察可被描述为一项概率性信号检测任务。在一项对照实验中,90名决策者参与了六项安全游戏的600次试验。每项安全游戏都是海因里希命题概率性信号检测理论抽象的一个数值示例。三项游戏在收益框架下设计,将安全选择视为无成本,而另外三项在损失框架下设计,将安全选择视为有成本。漏报的概率性惩罚设定为三个不同水平(1、0.5、0.1)。结果显示,决策最初往往具有风险性,而经验会导致更安全的行为。随着受罚概率降低,决策变得更具风险性,学习过程也受到损害。研究结果支持了埃雷夫等人(1995年)提出的截止强化学习模型。爬山学习模型(布塞迈耶和明,1992年)得到部分支持。本文还讨论了理论和实际意义。版权所有1998年学术出版社。

相似文献

1
Accidents and Decision Making under Uncertainty: A Comparison of Four Models.事故与不确定性下的决策制定:四种模型的比较
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1998 May;74(2):118-44. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2772.
2
Signal detection by human observers: a cutoff reinforcement learning model of categorization decisions under uncertainty.人类观察者的信号检测:不确定性下分类决策的截止强化学习模型
Psychol Rev. 1998 Apr;105(2):280-98. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.105.2.280.
3
The effect of shared responsibility and competition in perceptual games: a test of a cognitive game-theoretic extension of signal-detection theory.感知游戏中共同责任与竞争的影响:信号检测理论认知博弈论扩展的一项检验
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2000 Feb;26(1):325-41. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.26.1.325.
4
A mediation model to explain decision making under conditions of risk among adolescents: the role of fluid intelligence and probabilistic reasoning.一种解释青少年在风险条件下决策的中介模型:流体智力和概率推理的作用。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2014;36(6):588-95. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2014.918091. Epub 2014 May 30.
5
Risk and Rationality in Adolescent Decision Making: Implications for Theory, Practice, and Public Policy.青少年决策中的风险与理性:对理论、实践和公共政策的启示。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2006 Sep;7(1):1-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00026.x. Epub 2006 Sep 1.
6
Gunslingers, poker players, and chickens 1: Decision making under physical performance pressure in elite athletes.神枪手、扑克玩家与斗鸡1:精英运动员在身体表现压力下的决策制定
Prog Brain Res. 2017;234:291-316. doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2017.08.001. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
7
On Learning To Become a Successful Loser: A Comparison of Alternative Abstractions of Learning Processes in the Loss Domain.论学习成为一名成功的失败者:损失领域中学习过程的替代抽象概念比较
J Math Psychol. 1998 Jun;42(2/3):266-86. doi: 10.1006/jmps.1998.1214.
8
Misfortune may be a blessing in disguise: Fairness perception and emotion modulate decision making.塞翁失马,焉知非福:公平感与情绪调节决策。
Psychophysiology. 2017 Aug;54(8):1163-1179. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12870. Epub 2017 Apr 19.
9
Generations of "wasted chances": Władysław Heinrich and psychology in Poland.
Hist Psychol. 2019 May;22(2):163-185. doi: 10.1037/hop0000125. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
10
Examining Factors that Influence the Existence of Heinrich's Safety Triangle Using Site-Specific H&S Data from More than 25,000 Establishments.利用超过 25000 家企业的特定地点健康与安全数据,考察影响 Heinrich 安全三角存在的因素。
Risk Anal. 2018 Apr;38(4):839-852. doi: 10.1111/risa.12869. Epub 2017 Aug 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Frequency of enforcement is more important than the severity of punishment in reducing violation behaviors.在减少违规行为方面,执行频率比惩罚力度更重要。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Oct 19;118(42). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2108507118.
2
Developing a Multi-variate Logistic Regression Model to Analyze Accident Scenarios: Case of Electrical Contractors.开发多元逻辑回归模型分析事故场景:以电工为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 6;17(13):4852. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17134852.
3
The Neuropeptide Oxytocin Induces a Social Altruism Bias.
神经肽催产素会引发一种社会利他主义倾向。
J Neurosci. 2015 Nov 25;35(47):15696-701. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3199-15.2015.
4
Decision making from economic and signal detection perspectives: development of an integrated framework.从经济和信号检测角度进行决策:一个综合框架的开发
Front Psychol. 2015 Jul 8;6:952. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00952. eCollection 2015.
5
Maximization, learning, and economic behavior.最大化、学习和经济行为。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jul 22;111 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):10818-25. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1402846111. Epub 2014 Jul 14.
6
Comparison of basic assumptions embedded in learning models for experience-based decision making.基于经验的决策学习模型中所蕴含的基本假设的比较。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Jun;12(3):387-402. doi: 10.3758/bf03193783.
7
On the generality of optimal versus objective classifier feedback effects on decision criterion learning in perceptual categorization.关于最优与客观分类器反馈对感知分类中决策标准学习的普遍影响。
Mem Cognit. 2003 Mar;31(2):181-98. doi: 10.3758/bf03194378.