Moran P J, Christensen A J, Lawton W J
Department of Psychology, University of Iowa, Iowa City 52242, USA.
Ann Behav Med. 1997 Fall;19(4):333-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02895150.
Previous conclusions regarding the role of social support in hemodialysis adherence are inconsistent, suggesting that other factors may moderate this relationship. Using the Five-Factor Model of Personality, we examined the hypothesis that conscientiousness would interact with social support in predicting fluid-intake and medication adherence in a sample of 56 chronic hemodialysis patients. Hierarchical regression analyses (controlling for demographic, clinical, and other personality variables) revealed a significant interaction between social support and conscientiousness. However, inconsistent with prediction, high support among patients with low conscientiousness was associated with poorer fluid-intake adherence, while support had little effect on fluid-intake adherence among high conscientiousness patients. No main or interactive effects were found for support or conscientiousness on a measure of medication adherence.
先前关于社会支持在血液透析依从性中作用的结论并不一致,这表明其他因素可能会调节这种关系。我们使用人格五因素模型,检验了在56名慢性血液透析患者样本中,尽责性会与社会支持相互作用以预测液体摄入量和药物依从性的假设。分层回归分析(控制人口统计学、临床和其他人格变量)显示社会支持与尽责性之间存在显著交互作用。然而,与预测结果不一致的是,低尽责性患者中高支持与较差的液体摄入依从性相关,而支持对高尽责性患者的液体摄入依从性影响不大。在药物依从性测量方面,未发现支持或尽责性的主效应或交互效应。