Christensen A J, Smith T W, Turner C W, Cundick K E
Department of Psychology, University of Iowa, Iowa City 52242, USA.
J Behav Med. 1994 Dec;17(6):549-66. doi: 10.1007/BF01857597.
We classified 52 in-center hemodialysis patients and 34 self-treated, continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients on two latent variable indices reflecting patient coping style (i.e., "Information Vigilance" and "Active Coping"). The concurrent and prospective interactive effects of Dialysis Type and Coping Style were examined on patient dietary and medication adherence and on patient depression. In cross-sectional analyses, higher Information Vigilance was associated with better dietary adherence for CAPD patients but poorer adherence for In-Center Hemodialysis patients. No significant effects were found on a measure of medication adherence. Information Vigilance exerted a concurrent main effect on depression, such that higher scores were associated with less depression irrespective of dialysis type. Higher Active Coping scores were associated with lower residualized change in depression for both types of dialysis.
我们根据反映患者应对方式的两个潜在变量指标(即“信息警觉”和“积极应对”),对52名接受中心血液透析的患者和34名自我治疗的持续性非卧床腹膜透析(CAPD)患者进行了分类。研究了透析类型和应对方式对患者饮食和药物依从性以及患者抑郁的同步和前瞻性交互作用。在横断面分析中,较高的信息警觉与CAPD患者较好的饮食依从性相关,但与接受中心血液透析的患者较差的依从性相关。在药物依从性测量方面未发现显著影响。信息警觉对抑郁有同步的主要影响,即无论透析类型如何,得分越高与抑郁程度越低相关。对于两种透析类型,较高的积极应对得分与抑郁的较低残差变化相关。