• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[Prospective randomized trial of meropenem versus cefotaxime and metronidazole in the treatment of intraabdominal infections].

作者信息

Sitges-Serra A, Guirao X, Díaz J, Azanza R, Rodríguez Noriega A, Lizasoaín M, Jover J M, Moreno Azcoita M, Caínzos M

机构信息

Departamentos de Cirugía, Hospital Universitario del Mar, Barcelona.

出版信息

Med Clin (Barc). 1998 Jun 27;111(3):88-91.

PMID:9706600
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The empiric antibiotic treatment of intraabdominal infections is in constant evolution. Monotherapy appears to be a desirable goal because of the simplicity of its administration, lack of toxic effects and wide spectrum.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A multicentre, prospective, randomized, open study was carried out to compare two antibiotic regimens in the treatment of intraabdominal infections in patients undergoing surgery. Ninety-eight consecutive patients were randomly allocated into two groups. One group (GM, n = 51) received meropenem (1 g/8 h) and the other (GCM, n = 47) a combination of cefotaxime (2 g/8 h) plus metronidazol (0.5 g/8 h). Clinical and bacteriological responses were assessed at the end of treatment and at 2-4 weeks.

RESULTS

The severity of patients as assessed by the APACHE II score was similar in both groups (GM: 7.2 and GCM: 8.1). Three patients in each group could not be evaluated due to premature interruption of treatment or deviation from the protocol. The mean duration of treatment was 7.4 days in GM and 7.9 days in GCM. A satisfactory clinical response was obtained in 95% of patients in both groups. 31 patients (61%) in GM and 26 patients (55%) in GCM were bacteriologically evaluable. Bacteriological erradication was achieved in 94% of patients in GM and in 92% of patients in GCM.

CONCLUSION

Meropenem is a good alternative for single antibiotic therapy in intraabdominal infections of moderate severity.

摘要

相似文献

1
[Prospective randomized trial of meropenem versus cefotaxime and metronidazole in the treatment of intraabdominal infections].
Med Clin (Barc). 1998 Jun 27;111(3):88-91.
2
Meropenem monotherapy versus cefotaxime plus metronidazole combination treatment for serious intra-abdominal infections.
Infection. 1996 Nov-Dec;24(6):473-9. doi: 10.1007/BF01713053.
3
Antibiotic monotherapy with meropenem in the surgical management of intra-abdominal infections.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1995 Jul;36 Suppl A:179-89. doi: 10.1093/jac/36.suppl_a.179.
4
A multi-centre study to compare meropenem and cefotaxime and metronidazole in the treatment of hospitalized patients with serious infections.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1997 May;39(5):631-8. doi: 10.1093/jac/39.5.631.
5
Carbapenems: monotherapy in intra-abdominal sepsis.碳青霉烯类药物:用于腹腔内脓毒症的单一疗法。
Scand J Infect Dis Suppl. 1995;96:28-33.
6
Safety and efficacy of meropenem in hospitalised children: randomised comparison with cefotaxime, alone and combined with metronidazole or amikacin. Meropenem Paediatric Study Group.美罗培南在住院儿童中的安全性和有效性:与头孢噻肟单独使用以及与甲硝唑或阿米卡星联合使用的随机对照研究。美罗培南儿科研究组
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1995 Jul;36 Suppl A:99-108. doi: 10.1093/jac/36.suppl_a.99.
7
Ciprofloxacin vs. cefotaxime regimens for the treatment of intra-abdominal infections.
Infection. 1995 Sep-Oct;23(5):278-82. doi: 10.1007/BF01716286.
8
Piperacillin/Tazobactam versus cefotaxime plus metronidazole for treatment of children with intra-abdominal infections requiring surgery.哌拉西林/他唑巴坦与头孢噻肟加甲硝唑治疗需手术的儿童腹腔内感染
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2001 Sep;20(9):643-6. doi: 10.1007/s100960100581.
9
[Comparison of 2 antibiotic combinations used for peritonitis. Cefotaxime-clindamycin versus cefotaxime-metronidazole].
Presse Med. 1991 Jan 19;20(2):57-60.
10
[Multicentre study of comparative efficacy of meropenem and combined regimens for empirical antibacterial therapy of severe nosocomial infections: results of clinical and pharmacoeconomic analysis].[美罗培南与联合用药方案用于重症医院感染经验性抗菌治疗的疗效比较多中心研究:临床及药物经济学分析结果]
Antibiot Khimioter. 2006;51(7):15-27.