Suppr超能文献

单眼扫视范式中视觉注视持续时间的刺激控制

Stimulus control of visual fixation duration in a single saccade paradigm.

作者信息

Sanders A F, van Duren L L

机构信息

Department of Cognitive Psychology, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Acta Psychol (Amst). 1998 Jul;99(2):163-76. doi: 10.1016/s0001-6918(98)00009-2.

Abstract

Subjects performed a task in which they successively inspected two stimuli presented at an equal distance of the left (SL) and the right (SR) of the visual meridian and subtending a 45 degrees visual angle. This was followed by a joint response on the basis of the status of both stimuli. The instruction was to fixate the position of SL at the start of a trial, followed by a single saccade to SR. In earlier studies on this paradigm it was suggested that the fixation time of SL (TL) may serve as a modern version of the (d)-reaction in which the time for achieving perceptual identification is measured uncontaminated by decision. This suggestion has the implicit assumption that, at least in this single saccade paradigm, the saccade from SL to SR is triggered when perceptual identification has been completed. There is the potential alternative that the duration of TL is programmed in advance, depending on the general processing demands of the stimuli in a block of trials. These two options were tested in two experiments. In the first, presentation of SL was delayed with a fixed or with a variable interval (200-400 ms) during a block of trials. In the second, the stimulus quality of SL was varied between and within blocks of trials. The results of either manipulation argue against preprogramming TL, and they are consistent with the hypothesis that the saccade is triggered upon completion of perceptual processing. Thus, TL in the single saccade paradigm appears a serious candidate for the (d)-reaction.

摘要

受试者执行一项任务,即他们依次检查在视觉子午线左侧(SL)和右侧(SR)等距呈现且张角为45度视角的两个刺激。随后根据两个刺激的状态做出联合反应。指令是在试验开始时注视SL的位置,然后单次扫视到SR。在早期关于此范式的研究中,有人提出SL的注视时间(TL)可能作为(d)反应的现代版本,其中测量实现感知识别的时间时不受决策影响。这一建议隐含的假设是,至少在这种单次扫视范式中,当感知识别完成时,从SL到SR的扫视才会触发。还有一种可能的替代情况,即TL的持续时间是预先设定的,这取决于一组试验中刺激的一般处理需求。在两个实验中对这两种情况进行了测试。在第一个实验中,在一组试验中,SL的呈现延迟固定或可变的间隔时间(200 - 400毫秒)。在第二个实验中,在不同组试验之间以及组内改变SL的刺激质量。任何一种操作的结果都反驳了TL是预先设定的观点,并且与扫视在感知处理完成时触发的假设一致。因此,在单次扫视范式中的TL似乎是(d)反应的一个有力候选指标。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验