• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于使用基于参考的方案进行的脊柱后前位僵硬程度判断的可靠性和有效性的调查。

An investigation of the reliability and validity of posteroanterior spinal stiffness judgments made using a reference-based protocol.

作者信息

Maher C G, Latimer J, Adams R

机构信息

School of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Lidcombe, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

Phys Ther. 1998 Aug;78(8):829-37. doi: 10.1093/ptj/78.8.829.

DOI:10.1093/ptj/78.8.829
PMID:9711208
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The reliability and criterion-related validity of ratings of posteroanterior (PA) spinal stiffness made using reference values for comparison have not been investigated. In this study, mechanical reference stimuli for points on an 11-point rating scale were used to determine whether using a reference scale may be feasible. Subjects. Five different raters took part in 2 studies in which they rated 40 subjects who were asymptomatic for low back pain.

METHODS

The interrater reliability of ratings was evaluated with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and standard errors of the measurement (SEMs). Criterion-related validity was evaluated by correlating judgments of PA spinal stiffness assessed manually with measurements of PA spinal stiffness provided by a mechanical device, the "Stiffness Assessment Machine" (SAM).

RESULTS

Although the reliability indices were generally high, with ICCs reaching .77 and with SEMs as low as 0.72 points, the evidence for criterion-related validity (i.e., the ability of the examiner to judge spinal stiffness levels) was not strong, with correlations reaching only .56.

CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSION

The reference-based protocol allows for more reliable measures of PA stiffness judgments than previous protocols have; however, the human ratings are not highly correlated with the SAM measures. The protocol will have clinical value if judgments made using it are shown to be reliable in clinically relevant subjects and to have validity for clinical management of patients.

摘要

背景与目的

使用参考值进行比较来评定后前位(PA)脊柱僵硬度的可靠性及与标准相关的效度尚未得到研究。在本研究中,使用11点量表上各点的机械参考刺激来确定使用参考量表是否可行。受试者。五名不同的评估者参与了两项研究,他们对40名无下背痛症状的受试者进行了评定。

方法

评定者间信度通过组内相关系数(ICC)和测量标准误(SEM)进行评估。与标准相关的效度通过将手动评估的PA脊柱僵硬度判断与机械装置“僵硬度评估仪”(SAM)提供的PA脊柱僵硬度测量值进行关联来评估。

结果

尽管信度指标总体较高,ICC达到0.77,SEM低至0.72分,但与标准相关的效度证据(即检查者判断脊柱僵硬度水平的能力)并不强,相关性仅达到0.56。

结论与讨论

基于参考的方案比以前的方案能更可靠地测量PA僵硬度判断;然而,人工评定与SAM测量值的相关性不高。如果使用该方案做出的判断在临床相关受试者中被证明是可靠的,并且对患者的临床管理具有效度,那么该方案将具有临床价值。

相似文献

1
An investigation of the reliability and validity of posteroanterior spinal stiffness judgments made using a reference-based protocol.一项关于使用基于参考的方案进行的脊柱后前位僵硬程度判断的可靠性和有效性的调查。
Phys Ther. 1998 Aug;78(8):829-37. doi: 10.1093/ptj/78.8.829.
2
Objective manual assessment of lumbar posteroanterior stiffness is now possible.现在可以对腰椎前后位僵硬程度进行客观的手动评估了。
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2003 Jan;26(1):34-9. doi: 10.1067/mmt.2003.3.
3
Is the clinical concept of spinal stiffness multidimensional?脊柱僵硬的临床概念是多维的吗?
Phys Ther. 1995 Oct;75(10):854-60; discussion 861-4. doi: 10.1093/ptj/75.10.854.
4
Criterion validity of manual assessment of spinal stiffness.脊柱僵硬程度手动评估的效标效度
Man Ther. 2014 Dec;19(6):589-94. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2014.06.001. Epub 2014 Jun 12.
5
Reliability of pain and stiffness assessments in clinical manual lumbar spine examination.临床手动腰椎检查中疼痛和僵硬评估的可靠性
Phys Ther. 1994 Sep;74(9):801-9; discussion 809-11. doi: 10.1093/ptj/74.9.801.
6
Stiffness and neuromuscular reflex response of the human spine to posteroanterior manipulative thrusts in patients with low back pain.下腰痛患者脊柱对后前向手法推力的刚度和神经肌肉反射反应
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2001 Oct;24(8):489-500. doi: 10.1067/mmt.2001.118209.
7
Quantifying the lumbar flexion-relaxation phenomenon: theory, normative data, and clinical applications.量化腰椎屈伸放松现象:理论、正常数据及临床应用。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Jul 1;28(13):1435-46. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000067085.46840.5A.
8
Within- and between-day reliability of spinal stiffness measurements obtained using a computer controlled mechanical indenter in individuals with and without low back pain.使用计算机控制的机械压头对有和没有腰痛的个体进行脊柱刚度测量的日内和日间可靠性。
Man Ther. 2013 Oct;18(5):395-402. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2013.02.003. Epub 2013 Mar 1.
9
The effects of high and low loading forces on measured values of lumbar stiffness.高低负荷力对腰椎刚度测量值的影响。
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1998 Mar-Apr;21(3):157-63.
10
Evaluation of a new device for measuring responses to posteroanterior forces in a patient population, Part 1: Reliability testing.一种用于测量患者群体对前后向力反应的新设备的评估,第1部分:可靠性测试。
Phys Ther. 1996 Feb;76(2):158-65. doi: 10.1093/ptj/76.2.158.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of Thoracic Spine Self-mobilization on Patients with Low Back Pain and Lumbar Hypermobility: A Randomized Controlled Trial.胸椎自我松动术对下背痛和腰椎活动度过大患者的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Prog Rehabil Med. 2023 Jul 22;8:20230022. doi: 10.2490/prm.20230022. eCollection 2023.
2
Assessing reliability and validity of different stiffness measurement tools on a multi-layered phantom tissue model.评估多层组织模型上不同硬度测量工具的可靠性和有效性。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 16;13(1):815. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-27742-w.
3
The bench-top accuracy of the VerteTrack spinal stiffness assessment device.
椎间孔镜下脊柱刚度评估装置的台架精度。
Chiropr Man Therap. 2020 Aug 18;28(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12998-020-00331-8.
4
Developing a clinical prediction rule to identify patients with lumbar disc herniation who demonstrate short-term improvement with mechanical lumbar traction.制定一项临床预测规则,以识别经机械性腰椎牵引后短期内病情改善的腰椎间盘突出症患者。
Phys Ther Res. 2019 Apr 20;22(1):9-16. doi: 10.1298/ptr.E9973. eCollection 2019.
5
Dry Needling for Patients With Neck Pain: Protocol of a Randomized Clinical Trial.针对颈部疼痛患者的干针疗法:一项随机临床试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2017 Nov 22;6(11):e227. doi: 10.2196/resprot.7980.
6
Association of lumbar spine stiffness and flexion-relaxation phenomenon with patient-reported outcomes in adults with chronic low back pain - a single-arm clinical trial investigating the effects of thrust spinal manipulation.腰椎僵硬和屈伸放松现象与慢性下腰痛成人患者自我报告结局的相关性——一项研究推力脊柱手法治疗效果的单臂临床试验
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2017 Jun 9;17(1):303. doi: 10.1186/s12906-017-1821-1.
7
Criterion validity of manual assessment of spinal stiffness.脊柱僵硬程度手动评估的效标效度
Man Ther. 2014 Dec;19(6):589-94. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2014.06.001. Epub 2014 Jun 12.
8
The science of spinal motion palpation: a review and update with implications for assessment and intervention.脊柱运动触诊科学:对评估和干预的回顾与更新
J Man Manip Ther. 2013 Aug;21(3):160-7. doi: 10.1179/2042618613Y.0000000029.
9
Reliability of joint mobility and pain assessment of the thoracic spine and rib cage in asymptomatic individuals.无症状个体胸椎和胸廓关节活动度及疼痛评估的可靠性
J Man Manip Ther. 2008;16(4):210-6. doi: 10.1179/106698108790818369.
10
Spinal manipulative therapy for acute low back pain: a clinical perspective.急性下背痛的脊柱推拿治疗:临床视角
J Man Manip Ther. 2008;16(4):198-203. doi: 10.1179/106698108790818279.