Helling T S, Daon E
Department of Surgery, University of Missouri-Kansas City, School of Medicine, USA.
Ann Surg. 1998 Aug;228(2):173-81. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199808000-00005.
The care of traumatic wounds has evolved over hundreds of years, largely as a result of armed conflicts. The lessons learned during World War I in the treatment of extensive soft-tissue injuries proved invaluable in reducing infection and preventing loss of limb and life. Foremost among these was the use of debridement. This report reviews the development of debridement as standard treatment of war wounds and highlights the surgeon largely responsible for its resurgence during one of this century's saddest chapters.
Before World War I, the care of wounds consisted of minimal exploration and liberal use of then-new antiseptics. For limited injuries, this approach appeared adequate. World War I saw the introduction of devastating weapons that produced injuries that caused extensive devitalization of tissue. Standard treatment of these patients proved woefully inadequate to prevent life-threatening infections.
This is a historical review of the conditions that occurred during World War I that prompted a change in wound management. One of those responsible for this change was the Belgian surgeon Antoine Depage. His life and contributions to the care of war wounds are profiled. Depage reintroduced the discarded French practice of wound incision and exploration (debridement) and combined it with excision of devitalized tissue.
Through the use of debridement, excision, and delayed wound closure based on bacteriologic survey, Depage was able to reduce the incidence of infectious complications of soft-tissue injuries, particularly those involving fractures.
Through his experiences in the Great War, Antoine Depage was able to formulate a treatment plan for wounds of war. All such injuries were assumed to be contaminated and, as such, they required early and careful debridement. Depage thought that wound closure should often be delayed and based his decision to close on the bacteriologic status of the wound. To him, we owe our current management of traumatic wounds.
创伤伤口的护理历经数百年不断演变,主要源于武装冲突。第一次世界大战期间在广泛软组织损伤治疗中汲取的经验教训,在减少感染以及预防肢体丧失和挽救生命方面被证明具有极高价值。其中最重要的就是清创术的应用。本报告回顾了清创术作为战伤标准治疗方法的发展历程,并着重介绍了在本世纪最悲惨篇章之一中对其复兴负有主要责任的外科医生。
在第一次世界大战之前,伤口护理包括极少的探查以及大量使用当时新出现的防腐剂。对于有限的损伤,这种方法似乎足够。第一次世界大战引入了具有毁灭性的武器,这些武器造成的损伤导致组织广泛失活。事实证明,对这些患者的标准治疗在预防危及生命的感染方面严重不足。
这是对第一次世界大战期间促使伤口处理发生变化的情况的历史回顾。促成这种变化的其中一人是比利时外科医生安托万·德帕热。介绍了他的生平以及他对战伤护理的贡献。德帕热重新引入了被摒弃的法国伤口切开和探查做法(清创术),并将其与切除失活组织相结合。
通过使用清创术、切除术以及基于细菌学检测的延迟伤口闭合,德帕热能够降低软组织损伤尤其是涉及骨折的损伤的感染并发症发生率。
通过在第一次世界大战中的经历,安托万·德帕热得以制定出战伤治疗方案。所有此类损伤都被认为已被污染,因此需要早期且仔细的清创。德帕热认为伤口闭合通常应延迟,并根据伤口的细菌学状况来决定是否闭合。我们当前对创伤伤口的处理方法归功于他。