Giancarlo T, Palmieri A, Giacomarra V, Russolo M
ENT Clinic University of Trieste, Cattinara Hospital, Italy.
Anticancer Res. 1998 Jul-Aug;18(4B):2805-9.
Carcinomas of the upper aerodigestive tract are characterized by a high incidence of local metastasis in the neck. The presence of lymph node metastasis represents the most unfavorable prognostic factor for these tumors. A diagnostic routine is needed in order to identify the highest number of neck metastasis, thereby optimizing the selection of patients eligible for surgical neck treatment and reduce costs and length of hospital stay.
Our study analyzes the sensibility, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of clinical examination, echography (US), computed tomography (CT) in cervical metastasis detection by comparing them with the histopathological examination of the neck dissection specimens (pN) in 53 patients suffering from carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract.
Clinical examination: sensibility 82.1%; specificity 80%; diagnostic accuracy 81.1%; US with a cut off point for minimal adenopathy diameter of 0.5 cm 92.8% sensibility, 60% specificity, 77.3% diagnostic accuracy; US with cut off point 1 cm 82.1% sensibility, 80% specificity, 81.1% diagnostic accuracy; US with cut off point 1 cm, also considering round shape or multiplicity of the adenopathy: 82.1 sensibility, 80% specificity, 81.1% diagnostic accuracy; CT with cut off point 0.5 cm: 92.8% sensibility, 32% specificity, 64.1% diagnostic accuracy; CT with cut off point 1 cm: 85.7% sensibility, 64% specificity, 75.4% diagnostic accuracy; CT with cut off point 1 cm, also considering central necrosis, extracapsular spread, multiplicity of the adenopathy 89.2 sensibility, 60% specificity, 75.5% diagnostic accuracy.
By relating the results obtained from preoperative methods to the anatomopathological analysis of the surgical specimens we can draw the following conclusions: a) a neck positive to palpation in a subject with carcinoma of the upper aero digestive tract must be submitted to neck dissection. Such patients have an 81.1% likelihood of having a metastasis. In these patients the use of radiologic studies of the neck must be restricted to cases with uncertain involvement of retropharingeal, mediastinic, paratracheal lymph nodes or in the follow-up after treatment; b) a neck negative to palpation in a subject with carcinoma of the upper aero digestive tract, must be further investigated. The US and the CT must use a cut-off point of 1 cm to consider a neck positive. Radiologic criteria for malignancy, i.e., multiplicity, roundish shape, central necrosis and capsular invasion do not significantly increase the diagnostic accuracy of the radiographic methods; c) the combined use of US and CT does not offer significant advantages in the detection of metastasis, in any case CT is preferable when primary tumor has to be evaluated; d) the assessment of patients that are negative to palpation and to US and to CT must consider the parameters linked with primary tumor, such as site and size, Broder's grading, Invasive Cell Grading, and thickness.
上消化道癌的特征是颈部局部转移发生率高。淋巴结转移的存在是这些肿瘤最不利的预后因素。需要一种诊断程序来识别最多数量的颈部转移,从而优化适合颈部手术治疗患者的选择,并降低成本和缩短住院时间。
我们的研究通过将临床检查、超声检查(US)、计算机断层扫描(CT)与53例上消化道癌患者颈部清扫标本的组织病理学检查(pN)进行比较,分析了它们在检测颈部转移方面的敏感性、特异性和诊断准确性。
临床检查:敏感性82.1%;特异性80%;诊断准确性81.1%;超声检查,以最小腺病直径0.5 cm为截断点,敏感性92.8%,特异性60%,诊断准确性77.3%;超声检查,截断点为1 cm,敏感性82.1%,特异性80%,诊断准确性81.1%;超声检查,截断点为1 cm,同时考虑腺病的圆形或多发性:敏感性82.1%,特异性80%,诊断准确性81.1%;CT检查,截断点为0.5 cm:敏感性92.8%,特异性32%,诊断准确性64.1%;CT检查,截断点为1 cm:敏感性85.7%,特异性64%,诊断准确性75.4%;CT检查以1 cm为截断点,同时考虑中央坏死、包膜外扩散、腺病多发性,敏感性89.2%,特异性60%,诊断准确性75.5%。
通过将术前方法获得的结果与手术标本的解剖病理学分析相关联,我们可以得出以下结论:a)上消化道癌患者颈部触诊阳性必须进行颈部清扫。此类患者发生转移的可能性为81.1%。在这些患者中,颈部影像学检查的使用应限于咽后、纵隔、气管旁淋巴结受累情况不确定的病例或治疗后的随访;b)上消化道癌患者颈部触诊阴性必须进一步检查。超声和CT必须使用1 cm的截断点来判断颈部阳性。恶性肿瘤的影像学标准,即多发性、圆形、中央坏死和包膜侵犯,并未显著提高影像学方法的诊断准确性;c)超声和CT联合使用在转移检测方面没有显著优势,在任何情况下,当需要评估原发肿瘤时,CT更可取;d)对触诊、超声和CT均为阴性的患者进行评估时,必须考虑与原发肿瘤相关的参数,如部位、大小、布罗德分级、浸润细胞分级和厚度。