Lee J, Bacon S P
Department of Speech and Hearing Science, Arizona State University, Tempe 85287-1908, USA.
J Acoust Soc Am. 1998 Aug;104(2 Pt 1):1013-22. doi: 10.1121/1.423315.
Physiological studies have suggested that the basal region of the cochlea is more nonlinear than the apical region. To evaluate this possibility psychophysically, suppression was investigated across signal frequency (250, 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz) in a forward-masking paradigm using both noise and tonal maskers/suppressors. Masker duration was 200 ms, signal duration was 20 or 40 ms, and signal delay was 0 or 20 ms; the longer delay was necessary to eliminate potential confusion effects observed with the (narrow-band) noise masker. When using a noise masker (spectrum level of 40 dB), suppression was determined by comparing the threshold in the presence of a broadband masker with that in the presence of a critical band (ERB) masker. When using a tonal masker (masker level of 50 dB SPL, suppressor level of 70 dB SPL, with the suppressor frequency being 1.2 times the masker/signal frequency), suppression was determined by comparing the threshold in the presence of the masker plus suppressor with that in the presence of the masker alone. The magnitude of suppression was determined either by the measured change in signal threshold or by the inferred change in masker level. Regardless of how suppression was quantified, for both masker types, the amount of suppression increased as signal frequency increased up to about 1000 Hz, but then reached an asymptote or decreased somewhat as signal frequency increased to 4000 Hz. The magnitude of suppression was much larger with a noise masker than with a tonal masker, which could be a result of the different number of components in the masker which might serve as a suppressor.
生理学研究表明,耳蜗的基部区域比顶部区域具有更强的非线性。为了从心理物理学角度评估这种可能性,我们在一个前掩蔽范式中,使用噪声和音调掩蔽器/抑制器,对信号频率(250、500、1000、2000和4000赫兹)范围内的抑制现象进行了研究。掩蔽器持续时间为200毫秒,信号持续时间为20或40毫秒,信号延迟为0或20毫秒;较长的延迟对于消除(窄带)噪声掩蔽器所观察到的潜在混淆效应是必要的。当使用噪声掩蔽器(频谱水平为40分贝)时,通过比较宽带掩蔽器存在时的阈值与临界带宽(等效矩形带宽)掩蔽器存在时的阈值来确定抑制情况。当使用音调掩蔽器(掩蔽器水平为50分贝声压级,抑制器水平为70分贝声压级,抑制器频率为掩蔽器/信号频率的1.2倍)时,通过比较掩蔽器加抑制器存在时的阈值与仅掩蔽器存在时的阈值来确定抑制情况。抑制的大小通过测量信号阈值的变化或推断掩蔽器水平的变化来确定。无论抑制如何量化,对于两种掩蔽器类型,抑制量随着信号频率增加到约1000赫兹而增加,但随后达到渐近线,或者随着信号频率增加到4000赫兹而略有下降。噪声掩蔽器的抑制大小比音调掩蔽器大得多,这可能是由于掩蔽器中可能作为抑制器的不同成分数量所致。