Garcia L A, Kerber R E
Cardiovascular Division, University of Iowa Hospital, Iowa City 52242, USA.
Resuscitation. 1998 Jun;37(3):139-43. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(98)00050-1.
Successful termination of ventricular fibrillation by transthoracic shocks is dependent on achieving adequate current flow, which in turn is governed by transthoracic impedance (TTI). The American Heart Association (AHA) Advanced Cardiac Life Support textbook recommends three electrode positions for defibrillation: (1) anterior-apex, (2) apex-posterior and (3) anterior-posterior. However, there are few data available comparing TTI of these positions. To study this, we applied large (78 cm2) self-adhesive monitor-defibrillator pads to 20 subjects (ten male, ten female, ages 21-79) and measured TTI using a validated test-pulse technique which does not require actual shocks. We performed two studies. In Study 1 (all 20 subjects) the electrode pads were applied in the three positions recommended by the AHA, with the posterior electrode placed in the right infrascapular location. All TTI measurements were made at end-expiration and body surface area (BSA) was recorded. The results (TTI, omega, mean +/- S.D.) for the respective positions were the following: anterior-apex, 82.0+/-24.7; apex-posterior, 71.2+/-23.5; anterior-posterior, 77.0+/-24.7 (P NS). In Study 2 (six subjects) we compared the effect of right vs. left infrascapular posterior electrode placement (TTI, omega): apex-right infrascapular (RIS), 76.8+/-18.4; apex-left infrascapular (LIS), 72.1+/-18.7; anterior-RIS, 72.5+/-19.4; anterior-LIS, 71.6+/-18.6 (P NS). Correlation of TTI (anterior-apex placement) with BSA: TTI = 15.9 (BSA) + 46.7, r = 0.60, P < 0.01; the correlations of TTI and BSA were similar in the other two electrode positions. Thus, the three AHA-recommended electrode positions for transthoracic defibrillation have equivalent and acceptable TTIs; current flow should be similar using any of these positions. Furthermore, the posterior electrode may be placed in either the right or the left infrascapular position without affecting TTI. TTI is related to BSA in any of the three recommended positions; patients with high BSA and TTI may require higher energy selection to achieve defibrillation.
经胸电击成功终止心室颤动取决于实现足够的电流流动,而这又受经胸阻抗(TTI)的支配。美国心脏协会(AHA)《高级心脏生命支持》教科书推荐了三种用于除颤的电极位置:(1)前 - 心尖,(2)心尖 - 后位,(3)前 - 后位。然而,比较这些位置TTI的可用数据很少。为了研究这一点,我们将大尺寸(78平方厘米)的自粘性监测 - 除颤电极片应用于20名受试者(10名男性,10名女性,年龄21 - 79岁),并使用经过验证的测试脉冲技术测量TTI,该技术不需要实际电击。我们进行了两项研究。在研究1(所有20名受试者)中,电极片按照AHA推荐的三个位置放置,后位电极置于右肩胛下位置。所有TTI测量均在呼气末进行,并记录体表面积(BSA)。各个位置的结果(TTI,欧姆,均值±标准差)如下:前 - 心尖,82.0±24.7;心尖 - 后位,71.2±23.5;前 - 后位,77.0±24.7(P无显著性差异)。在研究2(6名受试者)中,我们比较了右肩胛下与左肩胛下后位电极放置的效果(TTI,欧姆):心尖 - 右肩胛下(RIS),76.8±18.4;心尖 - 左肩胛下(LIS),72.1±18.7;前 - RIS,72.5±19.4;前 - LIS,71.6±18.6(P无显著性差异)。TTI(前 - 心尖放置)与BSA的相关性:TTI = 15.9(BSA)+ 46.7,r = 0.60,P < 0.01;在其他两个电极位置,TTI与BSA的相关性相似。因此,AHA推荐的三种经胸除颤电极位置具有等效且可接受的TTI;使用这些位置中的任何一个,电流流动应该相似。此外,后位电极可以放置在右或左肩胛下位置,而不影响TTI。在三个推荐位置中的任何一个,TTI都与BSA相关;BSA和TTI较高的患者可能需要更高的能量选择来实现除颤。