• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

贲门失弛缓症的治疗:从鲸骨到腹腔镜

Treating achalasia: from whalebone to laparoscope.

作者信息

Spiess A E, Kahrilas P J

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Ill 60611-3053, USA.

出版信息

JAMA. 1998 Aug 19;280(7):638-42. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.7.638.

DOI:10.1001/jama.280.7.638
PMID:9718057
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To review the pathophysiology and management of achalasia.

DATA SOURCES

Peer-reviewed publications located via MEDLINE using the search term esophageal achalasia (subheadings: complications, drug therapy, epidemiology, etiology, physiopathology, surgery, and therapy) published in English from 1966 to December 1997.

STUDY SELECTION

Of 2632 citations identified, 4.5% were selected for inclusion by authors' blinded review of the abstracts. New developments in the understanding of achalasia or reports of therapeutic efficacy in either controlled trials or uncontrolled consecutive series involving 10 patients or more observed for a year or longer were reviewed in detail.

DATA EXTRACTION

All 6 controlled therapeutic trials were included, and therapeutic efficacy in uncontrolled series was assessed by the authors extracting the patients with a good-to-excellent response from each study and calculating a pooled estimate of response rate with individual studies weighted proportionally to sample size.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Achalasia results from irreversible destruction of esophageal myenteric plexus neurons causing aperistalsis and failed lower sphincter relaxation. The only therapies that adequately compensate for this dysfunction for a sustained time are pneumatic dilation and Heller myotomy. The single controlled trial comparing these treatments found surgery superior to dilation (95% vs 51% nearly complete symptom resolution, P<.01). In uncontrolled trials pneumatic dilation (weighted mean [SD]) is 72% (26%) effective vs 84% (20%) for Heller myotomy. The limitation of dilation is a 3% risk of perforation; thoracotomy morbidity has been the major limitation of myotomy. Surgical morbidity has been sharply reduced by laparoscopic techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

Both pneumatic dilation and surgical myotomy are effective therapies for achalasia; laparoscopic Heller myotomy is emerging as the optimal surgical therapy.

摘要

目的

综述贲门失弛缓症的病理生理学及治疗方法。

资料来源

通过MEDLINE检索1966年至1997年12月期间发表的英文文献,检索词为食管贲门失弛缓症(副标题:并发症、药物治疗、流行病学、病因学、病理生理学、手术及治疗)。

研究选择

在检索到的2632篇文献中,作者通过对摘要进行盲法评审,选择了4.5%的文献纳入研究。对贲门失弛缓症认识方面的新进展,或在涉及10例及以上患者、观察时间为1年或更长时间的对照试验或非对照连续系列研究中有关治疗效果的报告进行了详细综述。

资料提取

纳入了全部6项对照治疗试验,作者从每项研究中提取反应良好至优秀的患者,计算各研究的反应率合并估计值,并按样本量进行加权,以此评估非对照系列研究中的治疗效果。

资料综合

贲门失弛缓症是由于食管肌间神经丛神经元不可逆性破坏,导致蠕动消失和下括约肌松弛障碍。能持续充分代偿这种功能障碍的唯一治疗方法是气囊扩张术和Heller肌切开术。比较这两种治疗方法的单一对照试验发现,手术治疗优于扩张术(几乎完全症状缓解率分别为95%和51%,P<0.01)。在非对照试验中,气囊扩张术(加权均值[标准差])的有效率为72%(26%),而Heller肌切开术为84%(20%)。扩张术的局限性是有3%的穿孔风险;开胸手术的发病率一直是肌切开术的主要局限性。腹腔镜技术已大幅降低了手术发病率。

结论

气囊扩张术和手术肌切开术都是治疗贲门失弛缓症的有效方法;腹腔镜Heller肌切开术正逐渐成为最佳的手术治疗方法。

相似文献

1
Treating achalasia: from whalebone to laparoscope.贲门失弛缓症的治疗:从鲸骨到腹腔镜
JAMA. 1998 Aug 19;280(7):638-42. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.7.638.
2
Achalasia-Specific Quality of Life After Pneumatic Dilation or Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy With Partial Fundoplication: A Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Trial.气囊扩张术或腹腔镜下贲门肌切开术加部分胃底折叠术后贲门失弛缓症患者的特定生活质量:一项多中心随机临床试验
Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Nov;111(11):1536-1545. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.402. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
3
Heller myotomy is superior to dilatation for the treatment of early achalasia.对于早期贲门失弛缓症的治疗,海勒肌切开术优于扩张术。
Arch Surg. 1997 Mar;132(3):233-40. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1997.01430270019002.
4
Previous endoscopic treatment does not affect complication rate and outcome of laparoscopic Heller myotomy and anterior fundoplication for oesophageal achalasia.既往内镜治疗不影响腹腔镜下食管贲门肌切开术及前位胃底折叠术治疗食管贲门失弛缓症的并发症发生率及疗效。
Ital J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1999 Dec;31(9):827-30.
5
Management strategies for achalasia.贲门失弛缓症的管理策略。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2014 Sep;26(9):1215-21. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12416.
6
Pneumatic dilation versus laparoscopic Heller's myotomy in the treatment of achalasia: systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials.气囊扩张与腹腔镜 Heller 肌切开术治疗贲门失弛缓症的比较:基于随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Dis Esophagus. 2019 Feb 1;32(2). doi: 10.1093/dote/doy105.
7
Achalasia: dilation, injection or surgery?贲门失弛缓症:扩张、注射还是手术?
Can J Gastroenterol. 2000 May;14(5):441-3. doi: 10.1155/2000/679608.
8
Laparoscopic Heller myotomy is not superior to pneumatic dilation in the management of primary achalasia: Conclusions of a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.在原发性贲门失弛缓症的治疗中,腹腔镜下赫勒肌切开术并不优于气囊扩张术:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析结论
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Feb;96(7):e5525. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005525.
9
Videoscopic heller myotomy as first-line therapy for severe achalasia.电视辅助下贲门肌层切开术作为重症贲门失弛缓症的一线治疗方法。
Am Surg. 2001 Nov;67(11):1105-9.
10
Management of achalasia: surgery or pneumatic dilation.贲门失弛缓症的治疗:手术还是气囊扩张。
Gut. 2011 Jun;60(6):869-76. doi: 10.1136/gut.2010.212423. Epub 2011 Feb 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-term outcomes after per-oral endoscopic myotomy versus laparoscopic Heller myotomy in the treatment of achalasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经口内镜下肌切开术与腹腔镜Heller肌切开术治疗贲门失弛缓症的长期疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jul 7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11895-y.
2
Relationship Between Lower Esophageal Sphincter Muscles Thickness and Their Response to Pneumatic Dilation in Patients With Achalasia.贲门失弛缓症患者食管下括约肌厚度与其对气囊扩张反应之间的关系。
J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2024 Sep 9;14(5):21-29. doi: 10.55729/2000-9666.1381. eCollection 2024.
3
Safety of a Novel Upper Esophageal Sphincter Balloon Dilator.
新型食管上括约肌球囊扩张器的安全性
Laryngoscope. 2025 Jan;135(1):66-72. doi: 10.1002/lary.31634. Epub 2024 Jul 10.
4
The outcome of 100 patients with achalasia cardia following laparoscopic Heller myotomy with blunt dissection technique.100例贲门失弛缓症患者采用钝性分离技术行腹腔镜Heller肌切开术后的结果。
J Minim Access Surg. 2023 Jul-Sep;19(3):408-413. doi: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_273_22.
5
Expanding the role of pneumatic dilation for nonachalasia patients: a comparative study.为非贲门失弛缓症患者扩大气囊扩张术的作用:一项对比研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2023 Feb;97(2):251-259. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.09.032. Epub 2022 Oct 11.
6
Peroral endoscopic myotomy laparoscopic myotomy and partial fundoplication for esophageal achalasia: A single-center randomized controlled trial.经口内镜肌切开术、腹腔镜肌切开术和部分胃底折叠术治疗食管失弛缓症:一项单中心随机对照试验。
World J Gastroenterol. 2022 Sep 7;28(33):4875-4889. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i33.4875.
7
Short versus standard peroral endoscopic myotomy for esophageal achalasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经口内镜下食管肌层切开术治疗贲门失弛缓症:短程与标准术式的系统评价和Meta分析
Ann Gastroenterol. 2021 Sep-Oct;34(5):634-642. doi: 10.20524/aog.2021.0644. Epub 2021 Jun 14.
8
Scoping Review and Bibliometric Analysis of the Most Influential Publications in Achalasia Research from 1995 to 2020.食管失弛缓症研究中最具影响力出版物的范围回顾和文献计量分析 1995 年至 2020 年。
Biomed Res Int. 2021 Feb 4;2021:8836395. doi: 10.1155/2021/8836395. eCollection 2021.
9
Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM): a comparative study between Chagasic and idiopathic achalasia.经口内镜下肌切开术(POEM):恰加斯病性贲门失弛缓症与特发性贲门失弛缓症的比较研究
Endosc Int Open. 2020 Apr;8(4):E506-E512. doi: 10.1055/a-1035-9288. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
10
The 100 most cited manuscripts in esophageal motility disorders: a bibliometric analysis.食管动力障碍领域被引用次数最多的100篇手稿:一项文献计量分析。
Ann Transl Med. 2019 Jul;7(14):310. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.06.34.