• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

群体决策中的相互依赖与争议:有效自我管理团队的前提条件

Interdependence and Controversy in Group Decision Making: Antecedents to Effective Self-Managing Teams.

作者信息

Alper S, Tjosvold D, Law KS

机构信息

University of Minnesota

出版信息

Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1998 Apr;74(1):33-52. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2748.

DOI:10.1006/obhd.1998.2748
PMID:9719650
Abstract

Self-managing teams have the challenge to make decisions regarding their tasks and to manage their internal affairs. Findings on 60 self-managing teams with 540 employees indicate that the theory of cooperation and competition is useful for identifying the social processes that help these teams grapple with problems and work effectively. Specifically, teams with highly cooperative goals were found to discuss their opposing views open-mindedly and constructively which in turn developed confidence in team dynamics that contributed to effective team performance. Competitive goals appeared to interfere with constructive controversy, confidence, and effectiveness. Findings were interpreted as suggesting that structuring cooperative goals and constructive controversy can help self-managing teams gain confidence and work productively. Copyright 1998 Academic Press.

摘要

自我管理团队面临着就其任务做出决策以及管理内部事务的挑战。对60个拥有540名员工的自我管理团队的研究结果表明,合作与竞争理论有助于识别那些帮助这些团队应对问题并高效工作的社会过程。具体而言,发现目标高度合作的团队会开明且建设性地讨论他们的不同观点,这反过来又培养了对团队动态的信心,从而有助于团队高效运作。竞争性目标似乎会干扰建设性的争论、信心和效率。研究结果被解释为表明构建合作性目标和建设性争论有助于自我管理团队获得信心并高效工作。版权所有1998年学术出版社。

相似文献

1
Interdependence and Controversy in Group Decision Making: Antecedents to Effective Self-Managing Teams.群体决策中的相互依赖与争议:有效自我管理团队的前提条件
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1998 Apr;74(1):33-52. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2748.
2
The Tendency toward Defective Decision Making within Self-Managing Teams: The Relevance of Groupthink for the 21st Century.自我管理团队中决策失误的倾向:群体思维在21世纪的相关性。
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1998 Feb;73(2/3):327-51. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2765.
3
A multilevel model of minority opinion expression and team decision-making effectiveness.多元层次模型视角下的少数派意见表达与团队决策有效性。
J Appl Psychol. 2010 Sep;95(5):824-33. doi: 10.1037/a0019939.
4
Collective goals and shared tasks: interdependence structure and perceptions of individual sport team environments.集体目标与共同任务:个体运动队环境的相互依存结构与认知
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015 Feb;25(1):e139-48. doi: 10.1111/sms.12235. Epub 2014 Apr 16.
5
Modelling the effect of perceived interdependence among mental healthcare professionals on their work role performance.模拟精神卫生保健专业人员之间感知到的相互依赖对其工作角色表现的影响。
J Interprof Care. 2017 Jul;31(4):520-528. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2017.1305951. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
6
Peer-based control in self-managing teams: linking rational and normative influence with individual and group performance.基于同伴的自我管理团队控制:将理性和规范影响与个人和团队绩效联系起来。
J Appl Psychol. 2012 Mar;97(2):435-47. doi: 10.1037/a0025303. Epub 2011 Sep 5.
7
Effects of Cooperation and Competition on Performance, Emotion, and Effort: Goal and Means Interdependence.合作与竞争对绩效、情绪和努力的影响:目标与手段的相互依存关系。
J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2022 Apr 1;44(2):86-93. doi: 10.1123/jsep.2020-0357. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
8
Team Leader Structuring for Team Effectiveness and Team Learning in Command-and-Control Teams.指挥控制团队中为实现团队效能和团队学习而进行的团队领导架构设计。
Small Group Res. 2017 Apr;48(2):215-248. doi: 10.1177/1046496417689897. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
9
Implicit Coordination Strategies for Effective Team Communication.有效团队沟通的隐性协调策略
Hum Factors. 2016 Jun;58(4):595-610. doi: 10.1177/0018720816639712. Epub 2016 Apr 25.
10
Antecedents of Leader Utilization of Staff Input in Decision-Making Teams.决策团队中领导者利用员工意见的前因。
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1999 Mar;77(3):215-242. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2819.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and Psychometric Testing of a Taiwanese Team Interactions and Team Creativity Instrument (TITC-T) for Nursing Students.发展与心理计量测试-护理学生团队互动与团队创造力量表(TITC-T)。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 29;19(13):7958. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19137958.
2
Expertise Diversity, Informal Leadership Hierarchy, and Team Knowledge Creation: A study of pharmaceutical research collaborations.专业知识多样性、非正式领导层级与团队知识创造:一项关于制药研究合作的研究
Organ Stud. 2022 Jun;43(6):907-930. doi: 10.1177/01708406211026114. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
3
Status Competition and Implicit Coordination: Based on the Role of Knowledge Sharing and Psychological Safety.
地位竞争与隐性协调:基于知识共享和心理安全的作用
Front Psychol. 2022 May 2;13:871426. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.871426. eCollection 2022.
4
How Do Team Cooperative Goals Influence Thriving at Work: The Mediating Role of Team Time Consensus.团队合作目标如何影响工作中的蓬勃发展:团队时间共识的中介作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 29;19(9):5431. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095431.
5
Building resilience in oncology teams: Protocol for a realist evaluation of multiple cases.在肿瘤学团队中建立适应力:多案例的现实主义评估方案。
PLoS One. 2022 May 12;17(5):e0268393. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268393. eCollection 2022.
6
Exposure to Ideas, Evaluation Apprehension, and Incubation Intervals in Collaborative Idea Generation.协作式创意生成中的观念接触、评价顾虑与孵化间隔
Front Psychol. 2019 Jul 4;10:1459. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01459. eCollection 2019.
7
The dynamic relationship between multiple team membership and individual job performance in knowledge-intensive work.知识密集型工作中多重团队成员身份与个体工作绩效之间的动态关系。
J Organ Behav. 2018 Nov;39(9):1219-1231. doi: 10.1002/job.2260. Epub 2018 Jan 16.
8
Towards sustainable local welfare systems: The effects of functional heterogeneity and team autonomy on team processes in Dutch neighbourhood teams.迈向可持续的地方福利体系:功能异质性和团队自主性对荷兰邻里团队团队流程的影响。
Health Soc Care Community. 2019 Jan;27(1):82-92. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12604. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
9
Pulling together and pulling apart: influences of convergence and divergence on distributed healthcare teams.凝聚与分离:趋同和分歧对分布式医疗团队的影响
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2017 Dec;22(5):1085-1099. doi: 10.1007/s10459-016-9741-2. Epub 2017 Jan 23.