• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自我管理团队中决策失误的倾向:群体思维在21世纪的相关性。

The Tendency toward Defective Decision Making within Self-Managing Teams: The Relevance of Groupthink for the 21st Century.

作者信息

Moorhead G, Neck CP, West MS

机构信息

Department of Management, Arizona State University

出版信息

Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1998 Feb;73(2/3):327-51. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2765.

DOI:10.1006/obhd.1998.2765
PMID:9705807
Abstract

Groupthink theory has continued relevance to organizations because of the organizational trend toward self-managing work teams. A typology is developed linking the key differentiating characteristics of self-managing teams to groupthink antecedents of group cohesion, structural faults of the organization, and provocative situational context. Building upon this framework, we more specifically examine variables that will impact the occurrence of groupthink within self-managing teams. Implications for the prevention of groupthink in self-managing teams are discussed. Copyright 1998 Academic Press.

摘要

由于组织向自我管理工作团队发展的趋势,群体思维理论在组织中仍具有相关性。本文构建了一种类型学,将自我管理团队的关键差异特征与群体凝聚力的群体思维前因、组织的结构缺陷以及激发性的情境背景联系起来。基于这一框架,我们更具体地研究了将影响自我管理团队中群体思维发生的变量。讨论了预防自我管理团队中群体思维的意义。版权所有1998年学术出版社。

相似文献

1
The Tendency toward Defective Decision Making within Self-Managing Teams: The Relevance of Groupthink for the 21st Century.自我管理团队中决策失误的倾向:群体思维在21世纪的相关性。
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1998 Feb;73(2/3):327-51. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2765.
2
Recasting Janis's Groupthink Model: The Key Role of Collective Efficacy in Decision Fiascoes.重塑贾尼斯的群体思维模型:集体效能在决策失败中的关键作用。
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1998 Feb;73(2/3):185-209. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2761.
3
Organizational Tonypandy: Lessons from a Quarter Century of the Groupthink Phenomenon.组织性托宁潘迪现象:从群体思维现象的二十五年中汲取的教训
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1998 Feb;73(2/3):163-84. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2760.
4
Groupthink among health professional teams in patient care: A scoping review.医患护理中医疗专业团队的群体思维:范围综述。
Med Teach. 2022 Mar;44(3):309-318. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2021.1987404. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
5
Group Dynamics in Top Management Teams: Groupthink, Vigilance, and Alternative Models of Organizational Failure and Success.高层管理团队中的群体动态:群体思维、警觉以及组织成败的其他模型
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1998 Feb;73(2/3):272-305. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2763.
6
Interdependence and Controversy in Group Decision Making: Antecedents to Effective Self-Managing Teams.群体决策中的相互依赖与争议:有效自我管理团队的前提条件
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1998 Apr;74(1):33-52. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2748.
7
Group Dynamics in Janis's Theory of Groupthink: Backward and Forward.詹尼斯群体思维理论中的群体动力学:回顾与展望。
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1998 Feb;73(2/3):142-62. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2759.
8
Alive and Well after 25 Years: A Review of Groupthink Research.25年后依然活跃且发展良好:群体思维研究综述
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1998 Feb;73(2/3):116-41. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2758.
9
The Effects of Rudeness on NICU Medical Teams Studied by a New Tool for the Assessment of Decision-Making Group Dynamics.一种用于评估决策小组动态的新工具对新生儿重症监护室医疗团队粗鲁行为影响的研究
Children (Basel). 2022 Sep 21;9(10):1436. doi: 10.3390/children9101436.
10
Preventing Groupthink Revisited: Evaluating and Reforming Groups in Government.《重温防止群体思维:评估与改革政府中的群体》
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1998 Feb;73(2/3):306-26. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2764.

引用本文的文献

1
The silent majority: who speaks at IRB meetings?沉默的大多数:谁在机构审查委员会会议上发言?
IRB. 2012 Jul-Aug;34(4):15-20.