• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Bias in reporting clinical trials.临床试验报告中的偏倚。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1998 Aug;46(2):147-50. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1998.00759.x.
2
Report bias in drug research.
Therapie. 1996 Jul-Aug;51(4):382-3.
3
Selective outcome reporting in obesity clinical trials: a cross-sectional review.肥胖症临床试验中的选择性结果报告:一项横断面综述。
Clin Obes. 2017 Aug;7(4):245-254. doi: 10.1111/cob.12199. Epub 2017 May 30.
4
Impact of study outcome on submission and acceptance metrics for peer reviewed medical journals: six year retrospective review of all completed GlaxoSmithKline human drug research studies.研究结果对同行评审医学期刊投稿与录用指标的影响:葛兰素史克所有已完成的人体药物研究的六年回顾性分析
BMJ. 2017 Apr 21;357:j1726. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j1726.
5
[Publication bias in trials other than RCTs].[随机对照试验以外的其他试验中的发表偏倚]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2011;105(3):194-200. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2011.03.003. Epub 2011 Apr 2.
6
The significance of the trial outcome was associated with publication rate and time to publication.试验结果的意义与发表率和发表时间相关。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Apr;84:78-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.02.009. Epub 2017 Feb 24.
7
Why prudence is needed when interpreting articles reporting clinical trial results in mental health.在解读心理健康领域临床试验结果的文章时为何需要谨慎。
Trials. 2017 Mar 28;18(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1899-2.
8
Publication bias in the anesthesiology literature.麻醉学文献中的发表偏倚。
Anesth Analg. 2012 May;114(5):1042-8. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182468fc6. Epub 2012 Feb 17.
9
A Quantitative Assessment of the Reporting Quality of Herbal Medicine Research: The Road to Improvement.草药研究报告质量的定量评估:改进之路
J Altern Complement Med. 2018 Feb;24(2):168-181. doi: 10.1089/acm.2017.0085. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
10
Empirical evidence for outcome reporting bias in randomized clinical trials of acupuncture: comparison of registered records and subsequent publications.针刺随机临床试验中结果报告偏倚的实证证据:注册记录与后续出版物的比较。
Trials. 2015 Jan 27;16:28. doi: 10.1186/s13063-014-0545-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Time to publication for results of clinical trials.临床试验结果的发表时间。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 27;11(11):MR000011. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000011.pub3.
2
Clinical study reports published by the European Medicines Agency 2016-2018: a cross-sectional analysis.2016-2018 年欧洲药品管理局发布的临床研究报告:一项横断面分析。
BMJ Open. 2023 May 15;13(5):e068981. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068981.
3
Publication language and the estimate of treatment effects of physical therapy on balance and postural control after stroke in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials.发表语言与随机对照试验荟萃分析中物理治疗对脑卒中后平衡和姿势控制的治疗效果评估。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 9;15(3):e0229822. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229822. eCollection 2020.
4
Barriers towards the publication of academic drug trials. Follow-up of trials approved by the Danish Medicines Agency.学术药物试验发表的障碍。丹麦药品管理局批准的试验随访。
PLoS One. 2017 May 9;12(5):e0172581. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172581. eCollection 2017.
5
An increasing problem in publication ethics: Publication bias and editors' role in avoiding it.出版伦理中日益凸显的问题:发表偏倚以及编辑在避免该问题中的作用。
Med Health Care Philos. 2017 Jun;20(2):171-178. doi: 10.1007/s11019-017-9767-0.
6
Non-Publication Is Common among Phase 1, Single-Center, Not Prospectively Registered, or Early Terminated Clinical Drug Trials.在一期单中心、未进行前瞻性注册或提前终止的临床药物试验中,不发表研究结果的情况很常见。
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 14;11(12):e0167709. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167709. eCollection 2016.
7
Occurrence and determinants of selective reporting of clinical drug trials: design of an inception cohort study.临床药物试验选择性报告的发生率及决定因素:一项队列起始研究的设计
BMJ Open. 2015 Jul 7;5(7):e007827. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007827.
8
Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias - an updated review.系统评价研究发表偏倚和结果报告偏倚的实证证据——更新综述。
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 5;8(7):e66844. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066844. Print 2013.
9
Publication of NIH funded trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov: cross sectional analysis.美国国立卫生研究院资助的临床试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上的发表情况:横断面分析。
BMJ. 2012 Jan 3;344:d7292. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d7292.
10
Comparison of protocols and registry entries to published reports for randomised controlled trials.将随机对照试验的方案和注册条目与已发表报告进行比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jan 19;2011(1):MR000031. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000031.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Discrepancies between meta-analyses and subsequent large randomized, controlled trials.荟萃分析与随后的大型随机对照试验之间的差异。
N Engl J Med. 1997 Aug 21;337(8):536-42. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199708213370806.
2
Report bias in drug research.
Therapie. 1996 Jul-Aug;51(4):382-3.
3
Growing pains of meta-analysis.元分析的成长烦恼。
BMJ. 1996 Sep 21;313(7059):702-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7059.702.
4
Whose data are they anyway?这些数据到底是谁的?
BMJ. 1996 May 18;312(7041):1241-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7041.1241.
5
Data-proof practice.基于数据的实践。
Lancet. 1993;342(8886-8887):1499. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)80076-5.
6
Publication: an ethical imperative.发表:一项道德要求。
BMJ. 1995 May 20;310(6990):1313-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6990.1313.
7
Underreporting research is scientific misconduct.隐瞒研究成果属于科研不端行为。
JAMA. 1990 Mar 9;263(10):1405-8.
8
Publication bias in clinical research.临床研究中的发表偏倚。
Lancet. 1991 Apr 13;337(8746):867-72. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)90201-y.
9
Incorporating variations in the quality of individual randomized trials into meta-analysis.将个体随机试验质量的差异纳入荟萃分析。
J Clin Epidemiol. 1992 Mar;45(3):255-65. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(92)90085-2.
10
Publication bias: its implications for clinical pharmacology.发表偏倚:其对临床药理学的影响。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1992 Aug;52(2):115-9. doi: 10.1038/clpt.1992.119.

临床试验报告中的偏倚。

Bias in reporting clinical trials.

作者信息

Bardy A H

机构信息

National Agency for Medicines, Pharmacological Department, Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1998 Aug;46(2):147-50. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1998.00759.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2125.1998.00759.x
PMID:9723823
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1873669/
Abstract

AIMS

The primary aim of the present study was to identify possible occurrence of selective reporting of the results of clinical trials to the Finnish National Agency for Medicines. Selective reporting may lead to poorly informed action or inaction by regulatory authorities.

METHODS

In 1987, 274 clinical drug trials were notified to the Finnish National Agency for Medicines. By December 1993, final reports had been received from 68 of these trials and statements that the trial had been suspended from 24 trials. The sponsors of the non-reported trials were requested to report the outcome. The outcomes, if any, of all reported and non-reported trials were classified as positive, inconclusive or negative.

RESULTS

The total number of trials with positive, inconclusive or negative outcome were 111, 33 and 44, respectively; the outcomes of 86 trials could not be assessed. Final reports were received from 42/111 (38%) trials with positive, 6/33 (18%) with inconclusive and 9/44 (20%) with negative outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Substantial evidence of selective reporting was detected, since trials with positive outcome resulted more often in submission of final report to regulatory authority than those with inconclusive or negative outcomes.

摘要

目的

本研究的主要目的是确定向芬兰国家药品管理局选择性报告临床试验结果的可能情况。选择性报告可能导致监管机构做出信息不足的行动或不采取行动。

方法

1987年,274项临床药物试验通知了芬兰国家药品管理局。到1993年12月,已收到其中68项试验的最终报告,另有24项试验已暂停。要求未报告试验的申办者报告试验结果。所有已报告和未报告试验的结果(如有)分为阳性、不确定或阴性。

结果

结果为阳性、不确定或阴性的试验总数分别为111项、33项和44项;86项试验的结果无法评估。收到了42/111(38%)项阳性结果试验、6/33(18%)项不确定结果试验和9/44(20%)项阴性结果试验的最终报告。

结论

检测到大量选择性报告的证据,因为与结果不确定或阴性的试验相比,结果为阳性的试验更常向监管机构提交最终报告。