• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Report bias in drug research.

作者信息

Bardy A H

机构信息

National Agency for Medicines, Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

Therapie. 1996 Jul-Aug;51(4):382-3.

PMID:8953813
Abstract

Selective reporting of clinical trials to regulatory authorities could result in inappropriate marketing authorization decisions. The present study was conducted to uncover such potential bias, here called 'report bias'. In 1987 the number of clinical drug trials notified to Finnish National Agency for Medicines was 274. Up to the end of 1993, a final report or a statement that the trial had been suspended had only been received in the case of 91 studies. The outcome of 183 trials was not reported. These trials were not significantly different from those reported on, in their design, in blinding, or in the use of a comparator. The distribution in phases I to IV was similar in the reported and non-reported groups. Thus incomplete reporting was not caused by differences in the investigational plan. Other factors, such as differences in results, may be responsible. It is possible that findings that do not support commercial interests are less likely to be reported. This potential bias requires to be investigated and considered.

摘要

相似文献

1
Report bias in drug research.
Therapie. 1996 Jul-Aug;51(4):382-3.
2
Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.德国药品效益评估的程序和方法。
Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Nov;9 Suppl 1:5-29. doi: 10.1007/s10198-008-0122-5.
3
[Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].[德国药品效益评估的程序和方法]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008 Dec;133 Suppl 7:S225-46. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1100954. Epub 2008 Nov 25.
4
Anticancer Drug Development: The Way Forward.抗癌药物研发:前进之路
Oncologist. 1996;1(3):180-181.
5
Is selective reporting of clinical research unethical as well as unscientific?临床研究的选择性报告是否既不道德又不科学?
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1999 Jan;37(1):1-7.
6
Evidence of publication bias in reporting acute stroke clinical trials.急性中风临床试验报告中发表偏倚的证据。
Neurology. 2006 Sep 26;67(6):973-9. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000237331.16541.ac.
7
Bias in reporting clinical trials.临床试验报告中的偏倚。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1998 Aug;46(2):147-50. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1998.00759.x.
8
Association of industry sponsorship to published outcomes in gastrointestinal clinical research.胃肠道临床研究中行业赞助与发表成果的关联。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006 Dec;4(12):1445-51. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2006.08.019. Epub 2006 Nov 13.
9
Blinded trials taken to the test: an analysis of randomized clinical trials that report tests for the success of blinding.接受检验的盲法试验:对报告盲法成功检验的随机临床试验的分析
Int J Epidemiol. 2007 Jun;36(3):654-63. doi: 10.1093/ije/dym020. Epub 2007 Apr 17.
10
How to anticipate the assessment of the public health benefit of new medicines?如何预测对新药公共卫生效益的评估?
Therapie. 2007 Sep-Oct;62(5):427-35. doi: 10.2515/therapie:2007071. Epub 2008 Jan 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Is the randomized controlled drug trial in Europe lagging behind the USA?欧洲的随机对照药物试验是否落后于美国?
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2008 Dec;66(6):774-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2008.03296.x.
2
Likely country of origin in publications on randomised controlled trials and controlled clinical trials during the last 60 years.过去60年中随机对照试验和对照临床试验出版物可能的原产国。
Trials. 2007 Feb 27;8:7. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-8-7.
3
Bias in reporting clinical trials.临床试验报告中的偏倚。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1998 Aug;46(2):147-50. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1998.00759.x.