Leatherman T
Department of Anthropology, University of South Carolina, Columbia 20298, USA.
Soc Sci Med. 1998 Oct;47(8):1031-41. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00160-9.
New directions toward biocultural approaches to health and illness in Andean peoples have emerged since the original Health in the Andes volume was published in 1981. The reformulation of these perspectives was stimulated in part by the growth of political-economic perspectives in Andean ethnography and by critiques of medical ecology by critical medical anthropologists. This paper provides a brief history of changing biocultural perspectives on Andean health, and contrasts two projects dealing with Andean biology and health carried out in the 1960s and 1980s in the District of Nuñoa in Southern Peru. The recent Nuñoa research provides one example of a more critical biocultural approach that attempts to integrate perspectives from ecology and anthropological political economy. The utility of the approach is explored through the Nuñoa case study, which focused on the reproduction of illness and poverty in Andean households in contexts of social and economic change. Findings of this research are compared with recent work in the Andes to illustrate how a more critical biocultural perspective can better articulate with the diversity of approaches in medical anthropology and Andean health studies.
自1981年《安第斯地区的健康》一书首次出版以来,针对安第斯人群健康与疾病的生物文化研究方向有了新的发展。这些观点的重新阐述部分得益于安第斯民族志中政治经济观点的发展,以及批判性医学人类学家对医学生态学的批评。本文简要回顾了安第斯地区健康领域生物文化观点的演变历程,并对比了20世纪60年代和80年代在秘鲁南部努尼奥阿地区开展的两个关于安第斯生物学与健康的项目。近期在努尼奥阿开展的研究提供了一个更具批判性的生物文化研究方法的实例,该方法试图整合生态学和人类学政治经济学的观点。通过努尼奥阿案例研究探讨了该方法的实用性,该研究聚焦于社会经济变革背景下安第斯家庭中疾病与贫困的再现。本研究的结果与安第斯地区的近期研究进行了比较,以说明更具批判性的生物文化观点如何能更好地与医学人类学和安第斯健康研究中的多种方法相结合。