Newman R A, Chen W, Madden T L
Clinical Pharmacology Resource Facility, University of Texas, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
J Pharm Sci. 1998 Sep;87(9):1077-80. doi: 10.1021/js980122d.
The present studies were undertaken to compare the relative pharmacokinetic parameters and bioavailability of two chemically related natural products which are nonnucleoside inhibitors of reverse transcriptase. Both (+)-calanolide A (Cal A; NSC 675451) and (+)-dihydrocalanolide A (DHCal A; NSC 678323) are currently under development for the treatment of HIV infections. HPLC-based analytical assays were developed for both compounds using modifications of a previously published procedure. The assays were used to compare the intravenous pharmacokinetics of the dihydro analogue relative to the parent compound, Cal A, and to determine the relative oral bioavailability of each drug in CD2F1 mice. Although the pharmacokinetic parameters of each drug were similar (Cal A, 25 mg/kg: AUC: 9.4 [microg/mL]. hr, t1/2beta: 0.25 h,, t1/2gamma: 1.8 h, clearance: 2.7 L/h/kg versus DHCal A, 25 mg/kg: AUC: 6.9 [microg/mL].hr, t1/2beta: 0.22 h,, t1/2gamma: 2.3 h, clearance: 3.6 L/h/kg), the oral bioavailability of DHCal A (F = 46. 8%) was markedly better than that obtained for Cal A (F = 13.2%). The relative ability of Cal A and DHCal A to change to their inactive epimer forms, (+)-calanolide B and (+)-dihydrocalanolide B, respectively, was also determined. While conversion of active to inactive forms of the drugs was noted to occur in vitro especially under acidic conditions, no epimer forms of either compound were noted in plasma of mice after administration of either CalA or DHCal A. Considered together with preliminary toxicology findings, the pharmacokinetic data obtained in the present series of experiments suggest that selection of the dihydro derivative of (+)-calanolide A may be a reasonable choice for further preclinical development and possible Phase I clinical evaluation.
本研究旨在比较两种化学相关的天然产物(非核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂)的相对药代动力学参数和生物利用度。(+)-卡拉诺利德A(Cal A;NSC 675451)和(+)-二氢卡拉诺利德A(DHCal A;NSC 678323)目前均在开发用于治疗HIV感染。基于高效液相色谱法(HPLC)的分析方法通过对先前发表的方法进行改进,针对这两种化合物得以开发。这些方法用于比较二氢类似物相对于母体化合物Cal A的静脉药代动力学,并确定每种药物在CD2F1小鼠中的相对口服生物利用度。尽管每种药物的药代动力学参数相似(Cal A,25mg/kg:AUC:9.4[μg/mL]·小时,t1/2β:0.25小时,t1/2γ:1.8小时,清除率:2.7L/小时/千克;而DHCal A,25mg/kg:AUC:6.9[μg/mL]·小时,t1/2β:0.22小时,t1/2γ:2.3小时,清除率:3.6L/小时/千克),但DHCal A的口服生物利用度(F = 46.8%)明显优于Cal A(F = 13.2%)。还确定了Cal A和DHCal A分别转化为其无活性差向异构体形式(+)-卡拉诺利德B和(+)-二氢卡拉诺利德B的相对能力。虽然注意到药物的活性形式向无活性形式的转化在体外尤其在酸性条件下会发生,但在给予Cal A或DHCal A后,在小鼠血浆中未发现任何一种化合物的差向异构体形式。结合初步毒理学研究结果,本系列实验中获得的药代动力学数据表明,选择(+)-卡拉诺利德A的二氢衍生物可能是进一步临床前开发和可能的I期临床评估的合理选择。