Arshad H, Luyt D, Goodwin A, Jones A, Hide D, Williams I
Clinical Allergy Research Unit, St. Mary's Hospital, Newport, Isle of Wight, U.K.
Respir Med. 1993 May;87(4):299-302. doi: 10.1016/0954-6111(93)90027-w.
One hundred and eighty-one children with asthma were entered into a randomized, controlled, crossover study comparing sodium cromoglycate via a metered dose inhaler (MDI) and a breath-actuated inhaler (Autohaler). There were no significant differences in pulmonary function tests (FEV1, FVC, PFER), symptom scores and bronchodilator use between the two devices. However both patients' and clinicians' opinions of sodium cromoglycate effectiveness were significantly better (P < 0.01) for the Autohaler. Autohaler was also thought to be easier to use (P < 0.001) and better for co-ordination of actuation with inhalation (P < 0.001). The Autohaler is as efficacious as the metered dose inhaler used by good co-ordinators. It seems to be the significantly better device with respect to ease of use, actuation and co-ordination which may aid compliance.
181名哮喘儿童参与了一项随机对照交叉研究,比较通过定量气雾剂(MDI)和呼吸驱动吸入器(Autohaler)使用色甘酸钠的效果。两种装置在肺功能测试(FEV1、FVC、PFER)、症状评分和支气管扩张剂使用方面没有显著差异。然而,患者和临床医生对色甘酸钠有效性的评价在使用Autohaler时明显更好(P < 0.01)。Autohaler也被认为更易于使用(P < 0.001),并且在启动与吸入的协调性方面更好(P < 0.001)。Autohaler与协调性良好者使用的定量气雾剂效果相同。在易用性、启动和协调性方面,它似乎明显更好,这可能有助于提高依从性。