Thériault J
Department of Sexology, Université du Québec à Montréal, Canada.
J Psychol. 1998 Sep;132(5):493-506. doi: 10.1080/00223989809599282.
The present study had 3 goals: (a) to provide a preliminary investigation of the dimensions involved in the capacity for intimacy toward the best friend and the sexual partner during adolescence; (b) to determine whether the specific areas of the capacity for intimacy toward the best friend are the same as toward the sexual partner; and (c) to consider the usefulness of conceiving the capacity for intimacy as a multidimensional concept. Canadian high school students (N = 465; 257 girls, 208 boys) completed a questionnaire on the capacity for intimacy, best friend version; 232 of them completed the partner version of the questionnaire. Factorial analysis on the best friend version of the questionnaire identified 3 factors: Social Intimacy, Positive Intimacy, and Negative Intimacy. Factorial analysis on the partner version of the questionnaire identified 4 factors: Social Intimacy, Positive Intimacy, Negative Intimacy, and Sexual Intimacy.
本研究有3个目标：(a) 对青少年时期与最好的朋友及性伴侣建立亲密关系能力所涉及的维度进行初步调查；(b) 确定与最好的朋友建立亲密关系能力的具体方面是否与和性伴侣建立亲密关系能力的具体方面相同；(c) 思考将亲密关系能力视为一个多维概念的有用性。加拿大高中生（N = 465；257名女生，208名男生）完成了一份关于亲密关系能力的问卷，即最好朋友版本；其中232人完成了伴侣版本的问卷。对问卷最好朋友版本的因子分析确定了3个因子：社交亲密、积极亲密和消极亲密。对问卷伴侣版本的因子分析确定了4个因子：社交亲密、积极亲密、消极亲密和性亲密。
