Mombour W, Bronisch T
Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Clinical Institute, Munich, Germany.
Psychopathology. 1998;31(5):274-80. doi: 10.1159/000029051.
The general definition of personality disorders (PD) has found agreement in many classification systems and has remained relatively stable over many decades. However, a closer look at the history of the classification of various PD reveals that there are changes from generation to generation: a continuous variation in our cultural norms means that some types are 'renormalised' from time to time and that others are added. On the other hand, a comparison of the descriptions and classifications of PD by Schneider, the DSM and ICD systems shows substantial agreement on many types of PD.
人格障碍(PD)的一般定义在许多分类系统中已达成共识,并且在几十年间一直保持相对稳定。然而,仔细审视各种人格障碍的分类历史会发现,不同代际之间存在变化:我们文化规范的持续演变意味着一些类型会不时地被“重新规范”,同时也会增加其他类型。另一方面,对施奈德、《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(DSM)和国际疾病分类(ICD)系统对人格障碍的描述与分类进行比较,可以发现它们在许多人格障碍类型上存在实质性的共识。