Suppr超能文献

Gleason评分为7预示着接受放射治疗的前列腺癌患者预后较差。

A Gleason score of 7 predicts a worse outcome for prostate carcinoma patients treated with radiotherapy.

作者信息

Green G A, Hanlon A L, Al-Saleem T, Hanks G E

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19111, USA.

出版信息

Cancer. 1998 Sep 1;83(5):971-6.

PMID:9731902
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In most reported surgical series, prostate carcinoma patients with a Gleason score of 7 have had worse outcomes than those with other moderately differentiated cancers. Because of variations in reporting grade and grouping Gleason scores, radiation series have conflicting results.

METHODS

Five hundred sixty-three men with clinical Stage T1-T3, N0 or Nx, M0 adenocarcinoma of the prostate and known pretreatment prostate specific (PSA) levels received external beam radiation only. The median pretreatment PSA was 10.3 ng/mL (range, 0.2-191 ng/mL). The median duration of follow-up was 42 months (range, 2-114 months). Survival without biochemical failure (bNED) was defined as PSA < or = 1.5 ng/mL and not rising when measured on two consecutive occasions.

RESULTS

The 5-year rate of bNED control for all 563 patients was 62%. Increasing Gleason score predicted for decreased bNED control (78% for 2-4, 63% for 5-6, 37% for 7, and 33% for 8-10 at 5 years; P = 0.0001 for overall comparison). The bNED control rate for patients with a Gleason score of 7 was significantly less than the rate for those with Gleason 5-6 in both univariate (P = 0.0008) and multivariate (P = 0.0068) analysis. T classification by palpation, pretreatment PSA, and dose were also shown to be independent predictors of bNED control in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Even after adjustment for other known prognostic factors, a Gleason score of 7 was associated with worse bNED control than Gleason scores of 2-4 and 5-6 among patients treated with external beam radiotherapy only for clinically localized prostate carcinoma. Patients with a Gleason score of 7 should not be lumped together with those who have a Gleason score of 5-6; they may instead benefit from more aggressive treatment strategies.

摘要

背景

在大多数已报道的外科手术系列研究中, Gleason评分为7分的前列腺癌患者的预后比其他中度分化癌患者更差。由于在报告分级和对Gleason评分进行分组方面存在差异,放射治疗系列研究的结果相互矛盾。

方法

563例临床分期为T1-T3、N0或Nx、M0的前列腺腺癌且已知治疗前前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平的男性仅接受了外照射放疗。治疗前PSA的中位数为10.3 ng/mL(范围为0.2-191 ng/mL)。随访的中位数时间为42个月(范围为2-114个月)。无生化失败生存(bNED)定义为PSA≤1.5 ng/mL且连续两次测量时未升高。

结果

所有563例患者的5年bNED控制率为62%。Gleason评分增加预示着bNED控制率降低(5年时,Gleason 2-4分为78%,5-6分为63%,7分为37%,8-10分为33%;总体比较P = 0.0001)。在单因素分析(P = 0.0008)和多因素分析(P = 0.0068)中,Gleason评分为7分的患者的bNED控制率均显著低于Gleason 5-6分的患者。在多因素分析中,通过触诊进行的T分期、治疗前PSA和剂量也被证明是bNED控制的独立预测因素。

结论

即使在对其他已知预后因素进行调整后,在仅接受外照射放疗治疗临床局限性前列腺癌的患者中,Gleason评分为7分与bNED控制情况比Gleason 2-4分和5-6分更差相关。Gleason评分为7分的患者不应与Gleason评分为5-6分的患者归为一类;他们可能反而会从更积极的治疗策略中获益。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验