Suppr超能文献

阳性和阴性一致性指标的近似标准误差和置信区间。

Approximate standard errors and confidence intervals for indices of positive and negative agreement.

作者信息

Graham P, Bull B

机构信息

Department of Public Health and General Practice, Christchurch School of Medicine, New Zealand.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 1998 Sep;51(9):763-71. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00048-1.

Abstract

Indices of positive and negative agreement for observer reliability studies, in which neither observer can be regarded as the standard, have been proposed. In this article, it is demonstrated by means of an example and a small simulation study that a recently published method for constructing confidence intervals for these indices leads to intervals that are too wide. Appropriate asymptotic (i.e., large sample) variance estimates and confidence intervals for the positive and negative agreement indices are presented and compared with bootstrap confidence intervals. We also discuss an alternative method of interval estimation motivated from a Bayesian viewpoint. The asymptotic intervals performed adequately for sample sizes of 200 or more. For smaller samples, alternative confidence intervals such as bootstrap intervals or Bayesian intervals should be considered.

摘要

已经提出了用于观察者可靠性研究的正一致性和负一致性指标,在这类研究中,没有一个观察者可被视为标准。在本文中,通过一个例子和一个小型模拟研究表明,最近发表的一种为这些指标构建置信区间的方法会导致区间过宽。本文给出了正一致性和负一致性指标的适当渐近(即大样本)方差估计和置信区间,并与自助法置信区间进行了比较。我们还讨论了一种从贝叶斯观点出发的区间估计替代方法。对于样本量为200或更多的情况,渐近区间表现良好。对于较小的样本,应考虑使用替代置信区间,如自助法区间或贝叶斯区间。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验