Orono Sheillah Ayiela, Gitao George Chege, Mpatswenumugabo Jean Pierre, Chepkwony Maurine, Mutisya Christine, Okoth Edward, Bronsvoort Barend Mark de Clare, Russell George Cameron, Nene Vishvanath, Cook Elizabeth Anne Jessie
Department of Veterinary Pathology, Microbiology and Parasitology, University of Nairobi, P. O. Box, 29053, Kangemi, Kenya.
International Livestock Research Institute, Old Naivasha Road, P. O. Box 30709, Nairobi, Kenya.
BMC Vet Res. 2019 Feb 28;15(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12917-019-1818-8.
Wildebeest associated malignant catarrhal fever (WA-MCF) is a fatal disease of cattle. Outbreaks are seasonal and associated with close interaction between cattle and calving wildebeest. In Kenya, WA-MCF has a dramatic effect on cattle-keepers who lose up to 10% of their cattle herds per year. The objective of this study was to report the impact of WA-MCF on a commercial ranch and assess the performance of clinical diagnosis compared to laboratory diagnosis as a disease management tool. A retrospective study of WA-MCF in cattle was conducted from 2014 to 2016 at Kapiti Plains Ranch Ltd., Kenya. During this period, 325 animals showed clinical signs of WA-MCF and of these, 123 were opportunistically sampled. In addition, 51 clinically healthy animals were sampled. Nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and indirect enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) were used to confirm clinically diagnosed cases of WA-MCF. A latent class model (LCM) was used to evaluate the diagnostic parameters of clinical diagnosis and the tests in the absence of a gold standard.
By PCR, 94% (95% C.I. 89-97%) of clinically affected animals were positive to WA-MCF while 63% (95% C.I. 54-71%) were positive by indirect ELISA. The LCM demonstrated the indirect ELISA had poor sensitivity 63.3% (95% PCI 54.4-71.7%) and specificity 62.6% (95% PCI 39.2-84.9%) while the nested PCR performed better with sensitivity 96.1% (95% PCI 90.7-99.7%) and specificity 92.9% (95% PCI 76.1-99.8%). The sensitivity and specificity of clinical diagnosis were 99.1% (95% PCI 96.8-100.0%) and 71.5% (95% PCI 48.0-97.2%) respectively.
Clinical diagnosis was demonstrated to be an effective method to identify affected animals although animals may be incorrectly classified resulting in financial loss. The study revealed indirect ELISA as a poor test and nested PCR to be a more appropriate confirmatory test for diagnosing acute WA-MCF. However, the logistics of PCR make it unsuitable for field diagnosis of WA-MCF. The future of WA-MCF diagnosis should be aimed at development of penside techniques, which will allow for fast detection in the field.
牛羚相关恶性卡他热(WA-MCF)是牛的一种致命疾病。疫情具有季节性,与牛和产犊牛羚之间的密切接触有关。在肯尼亚,WA-MCF对养牛户有巨大影响,他们每年损失高达10%的牛群。本研究的目的是报告WA-MCF对一个商业牧场的影响,并评估作为疾病管理工具的临床诊断与实验室诊断的性能。2014年至2016年在肯尼亚的卡皮蒂平原牧场有限公司对牛的WA-MCF进行了一项回顾性研究。在此期间,325只动物表现出WA-MCF的临床症状,其中123只被机会性采样。此外,对51只临床健康的动物进行了采样。采用巢式聚合酶链反应(PCR)和间接酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)来确诊临床诊断的WA-MCF病例。在没有金标准的情况下,使用潜在类别模型(LCM)来评估临床诊断和检测的诊断参数。
通过PCR,94%(95%置信区间89 - 97%)的临床患病动物对WA-MCF呈阳性,而通过间接ELISA检测,63%(95%置信区间54 - 71%)呈阳性。LCM显示间接ELISA的敏感性较差,为63.3%(