Dailey S W, Brinker M R, Elliott M N
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Saint Luke's Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 1998 Aug;27(8):563-70.
The content and adequacy of orthopedic surgery residency training can be evaluated by several means. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and the Residency Review Committee set standards with which residency programs must comply in order to be accredited. Residents' perceptions of the content and adequacy of their training is another means of evaluating orthopedic residency training. A questionnaire was sent to all graduating orthopedic residents in the United States, Canada, and Puerto Rico. The questionnaire provided program and individual resident demographics, as well as the residents' rating of specific areas of residency training on a 5-point scale (1=superior, 2=above average, 3=average, 4=below average, 5=inadequate). Completed surveys were received from 454 of the 698 graduating orthopedic surgery residents listed by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; the response rate was therefore 65.0%. Our respondents were representative of the entire population in terms of geographic and sex distribution. Respondents rated their general orthopedic training at 1.9. The areas of training that had the best ratings included trauma/fracture (1.8), adult reconstruction (1.9), and pediatrics (1.9). The worst rating was reported for training in foot and ankle (2.7). Factors related to better ratings for general orthopedic training included male sex of residents, programs with more full-time faculty, programs with more hours of weekly teaching conferences, programs with one or more faculty present at all teaching conferences and programs in which residents first operate independently at or before postgraduate year 4. Sixty-six percent of all respondents were planning to hold a fellowship immediately after graduation. The most common fellowships taken included sports medicine (20.5% of all respondents), hand (12.1%), and spine (9.5%). Younger graduating residents, those from larger programs (more residents per year), and those from the Mideast (U.S.), and New England regions were most likely to enter a fellowship after graduation.
骨科住院医师培训的内容和充足性可以通过多种方式进行评估。毕业后医学教育认证委员会和住院医师评审委员会制定了住院医师培训项目必须遵守的标准,以便获得认证。住院医师对培训内容和充足性的看法是评估骨科住院医师培训的另一种方式。一份问卷被发送给了美国、加拿大和波多黎各所有即将毕业的骨科住院医师。该问卷提供了培训项目和住院医师个人的人口统计学信息,以及住院医师对住院医师培训特定领域的5分制评分(1 = 优秀,2 = 高于平均水平,3 = 平均水平,4 = 低于平均水平,5 = 不足)。美国骨科医师学会列出的698名即将毕业的骨科手术住院医师中,有454人完成了调查;因此,回复率为65.0%。在地理分布和性别分布方面,我们的受访者代表了全体人群。受访者对他们的普通骨科培训评分为1.9。评分最高的培训领域包括创伤/骨折(1.8)、成人重建(1.9)和儿科(1.9)。足部和踝关节培训的评分最差(2.7)。普通骨科培训评分较高的相关因素包括住院医师为男性、全职教员更多的培训项目、每周教学会议时间更长的项目、所有教学会议都有一名或多名教员出席的项目,以及住院医师在研究生第4年或之前首次独立进行手术的项目。所有受访者中有66%计划毕业后立即参加专科培训。最常见的专科培训包括运动医学(占所有受访者的20.5%)、手外科(12.1%)和脊柱外科(9.5%)。年轻的即将毕业的住院医师、来自较大培训项目(每年住院医师更多)的住院医师,以及来自中东(美国)和新英格兰地区的住院医师毕业后最有可能参加专科培训。