Timmings P L
Waikato Hospital, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Seizure. 1998 Aug;7(4):289-91. doi: 10.1016/s1059-1311(98)80020-4.
Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) has been recognised for centuries. The precise frequency of occurrence is not well defined. Education of medical professionals is needed, so that death certificates and coronial inquests may appropriately, correctly and consistently record SUDEP as the case of death. Correct identification will then allow further investigation of this misunderstood, and often ignored, epilepsy complication. SUDEP incidence may be increasing, either as a result of increased recognition, or possibly due to a real increase in incidence. All currently available antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) have been associated with SUDEP, and current opinion assumes that the relative proportion of patients suffering SUDEP is representative of average AED usage type for a particular time and locality, however, recently analysed data suggest a strong bias towards carbamazepine. A review of Cardiff Epilepsy Unit data shows that carbamazepine was disproportionately represented in patients suffering SUDEP. In this series, 11 of the 14 SUDEP patients were taking carbamazepine at the time of death. This was calculated as 79% of all patients, compared to average carbamazepine usage by all other Cardiff Epilepsy Unit patients of 38%. The data also indicate that one patient was not taking any drug therapy, and died during his first seizure, reducing the number of evaluable 'drug usage' patients to 13, and increasing the proportion taking carbamazepine at the time of death to 85%, (P < 0.01). Possible mechanisms include carbamazepine induced lengthening of the ECG Q-T interval combined with a mild pro-arrhythmic effect of epileptic seizure discharges, and consequent transient cardiac instability leading to arrhythmic death. Or alternatively, excessive post-seizure brainstem inhibition might result in blunting or transient abolition of central hypoxic and hypercarbic respiratory drive, with consequent post-ictal respiratory arrest, subsequent exacerbation of hypoxia, further cardiac destabilisation and death due to hypoxia/failed re-establishment of respiration and terminal cardiac arrhythmia. Current knowledge about SUDEP remains poor. Education is needed so that case ascertainment can be correctly documented. Delineation of the precise mechanisms involved should lead to definitive prevention strategies. Evaluation of carbamazepine as a significant causative factor in SUDEP is also needed.
癫痫猝死(SUDEP)已被认知数百年。其确切的发生频率尚不清楚。需要对医学专业人员进行教育,以便死亡证明和死因调查能够恰当、正确且一致地将SUDEP记录为死亡原因。正确识别将有助于进一步研究这种被误解且常被忽视的癫痫并发症。SUDEP的发病率可能在上升,这要么是因为认知度提高,要么可能是实际发病率增加。目前所有可用的抗癫痫药物(AEDs)都与SUDEP有关,目前的观点认为,SUDEP患者的相对比例代表了特定时间和地点的AED平均使用类型,然而,最近分析的数据表明对卡马西平存在强烈偏向。对加的夫癫痫中心数据的回顾显示,卡马西平在SUDEP患者中所占比例过高。在这个系列中,14例SUDEP患者中有11例在死亡时正在服用卡马西平。这被计算为所有患者的79%,而加的夫癫痫中心所有其他患者的卡马西平平均使用率为38%。数据还表明,有1名患者未接受任何药物治疗,在首次发作时死亡,从而将可评估“药物使用情况”的患者数量减少至13例,并将死亡时服用卡马西平的比例提高到85%,(P < 0.01)。可能的机制包括卡马西平导致心电图Q-T间期延长,同时癫痫发作放电具有轻度促心律失常作用,以及随之而来的短暂心脏不稳定导致心律失常死亡。或者,癫痫发作后脑干过度抑制可能导致中枢性低氧和高碳酸血症呼吸驱动减弱或短暂消失,从而导致发作后呼吸骤停、随后缺氧加重、进一步心脏失稳以及因缺氧/呼吸未能重新建立和终末期心律失常而死亡。目前关于SUDEP的知识仍然匮乏。需要进行教育以便能够正确记录病例确诊情况。明确所涉及的确切机制应能导致确定的预防策略。还需要评估卡马西平作为SUDEP的一个重要致病因素。