Walczak Thaddeus
MINCEP Epilepsy Care, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55447, USA.
Drug Saf. 2003;26(10):673-83. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200326100-00001.
Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) accounts for approximately 2% of deaths in population-based cohorts of epilepsy, and up to 25% of deaths in cohorts of more severe epilepsy. When it occurs, SUDEP usually follows a generalised tonic-clonic seizure. Unresponsiveness, apnoea, and cardiac arrest occur in SUDEP, rather than the typical gradual recovery. The great majority of tonic-clonic seizures occur without difficulty and how the rare seizure associated with SUDEP differs from others is unknown.Three mechanisms have been proposed for SUDEP: cardiac arrhythmia, neurogenic pulmonary oedema, and postictal suppression of brainstem respiratory centres leading to central apnoea. Recent studies have found that the incidence of SUDEP increases with the severity of epilepsy in the population studied. The duration of epilepsy, number of tonic-clonic seizures, mental retardation, and simultaneous treatment with more than two antiepileptic drugs are independent risk factors for SUDEP. Some studies have reported that carbamazepine use, carbamazepine toxicity, and frequent, rapid changes in carbamazepine levels, may be associated with SUDEP. Other evidence indicates that carbamazepine could potentially increase the risk for SUDEP by causing arrhythmia or by altering cardiac autonomic function. However, this evidence is tenuous and most studies have not found an association between the use of carbamazepine or any other individual antiepileptic drug and SUDEP. There is little information regarding antiepileptic drugs other than phenytoin and carbamazepine. The incidence of SUDEP with gabapentin, tiagabine, and lamotrigine clinical development programmes is in the range found in other populations with refractory epilepsy. This suggests that these individual antiepileptic drugs are no more likely to cause SUDEP than antiepileptic drugs in general. Best current evidence indicates that the risk of SUDEP can be decreased by aggressive treatment of tonic-clonic seizures with as few antiepileptic drugs as necessary to achieve complete control. At present there is no strong reason to avoid any particular antiepileptic drug. Further studies are needed to elucidate the potential role of individual antiepileptic drugs in SUDEP and establish clinical relevance, if any. These studies may be challenging to conduct and interpret because SUDEP is relatively uncommon and large numbers will be necessary to narrow confidence intervals to determine the clinical relevance. Also adjustments will be needed to account for the potent risks associated with other independent factors.
癫痫猝死(SUDEP)在基于人群的癫痫队列中约占死亡人数的2%,在病情更严重的癫痫队列中占死亡人数的比例高达25%。SUDEP发生时,通常继发于全面性强直阵挛发作之后。SUDEP会出现无反应、呼吸暂停和心脏骤停,而不是典型的逐渐恢复。绝大多数强直阵挛发作并无异常,与SUDEP相关的罕见发作与其他发作有何不同尚不清楚。关于SUDEP,已提出三种机制:心律失常、神经源性肺水肿以及发作后脑干呼吸中枢受抑制导致中枢性呼吸暂停。最近的研究发现,在所研究的人群中,SUDEP的发生率随癫痫严重程度的增加而上升。癫痫持续时间、强直阵挛发作次数、智力发育迟缓以及同时使用两种以上抗癫痫药物是SUDEP的独立危险因素。一些研究报告称,使用卡马西平、卡马西平中毒以及卡马西平血药浓度频繁、快速变化可能与SUDEP有关。其他证据表明,卡马西平可能通过引起心律失常或改变心脏自主神经功能而增加SUDEP的风险。然而,这一证据并不确凿,大多数研究并未发现使用卡马西平或任何其他单一抗癫痫药物与SUDEP之间存在关联。除苯妥英和卡马西平外,关于其他抗癫痫药物的信息很少。加巴喷丁、噻加宾和拉莫三嗪临床研发项目中的SUDEP发生率与其他难治性癫痫人群中的发生率相当。这表明这些单一抗癫痫药物并不比一般的抗癫痫药物更易导致SUDEP。目前最有力的证据表明,通过积极治疗强直阵挛发作,使用尽可能少的抗癫痫药物以实现完全控制,可降低SUDEP的风险。目前没有充分理由避免使用任何特定的抗癫痫药物。需要进一步研究以阐明单一抗癫痫药物在SUDEP中的潜在作用并确定其临床相关性(若有)。开展和解释这些研究可能具有挑战性,因为SUDEP相对罕见,需要大量样本才能缩小置信区间以确定临床相关性。此外,还需要进行调整以考虑与其他独立因素相关的潜在风险。
Expert Rev Neurother. 2020-5
Epilepsy Behav. 2017-5
Epilepsy Behav. 2011-6-12
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2014-12
Nat Rev Neurol. 2009-8-11
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2008-9
Clin Auton Res. 2006-2
Epilepsia. 1997-11
Epilepsia. 1997-11
Epilepsia. 1997-11
Science. 1963-9-6
Neurology. 2001-11-13
N Engl J Med. 2001-8-2