Ferrari R, Pepi P, Ferrari F, Nesta F, Benigno M, Visioli O
Cardiology, University of Brescia, Italy.
Am J Cardiol. 1998 Sep 3;82(5A):2K-13K. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00531-1.
The term myocardial ischemia describes a condition that exists when fractional uptake of oxygen in the heart is not sufficient to maintain the rate of cellular oxidation. This leads to extremely complex situations that have been extensively studied in recent years. Experimental research has been directed toward establishing the precise sequence of biochemical events leading to myocyte necrosis, as such knowledge could lead to rational treatments designed to delay myocardial cell death. At the present time, there is no simple answer to the question of what determines cell death and the failure to recover cell function after reperfusion. Problems arise because: (1) ischemic damage is not homogeneous and many factors may combine to cause cell death; (2) severity of biochemical changes and development of necrosis are usually linked (both the processes being dependent on the duration of ischemia) and it is impossible to establish a causal relation; and (3) the inevitability of necrosis can only be assessed by reperfusion of the ischemic myocardium. Restoration of flow, however, might result in numerous other negative consequences, thus directly influencing the degree of recovery. From the clinical point of view, we have recently learned that there are several potential manifestations and outcomes associated with myocardial ischemia and reperfusion. Without a doubt, ventricular dysfunction (either systolic or diastolic) of the ischemic zone is the most reliable clinical sign of ischemia, since electrocardiographic changes and symptoms are often absent. The ischemia-induced ventricular dysfunction, at least initially, is reversible, as early reperfusion of the myocardium results in restoration of normal metabolism and contraction. In the ischemic zone, recovery of contraction may occur instantaneously or, more frequently, with a considerable delay, thus yielding the condition recently recognized as the "stunned" myocardium. On the other hand, when ischemia is severe and prolonged, cell death may occur. Reperfusion at this stage is associated with the release of intracellular enzymes, damage of cell membranes, influx of calcium, persistent reduction of contractility, and eventual necrosis of at least a portion of the tissue. This entity has been called "reperfusion damage" by those who believe that much of the injury is the consequence of events occurring at the moment of reperfusion rather than a result of changes occurring during the period of ischemia. The existence of reperfusion damage, however, has been questioned, and it has been argued that, with the exception of induction of arrhythmias, it is difficult to be certain that reperfusion causes further injury. The existence of such an entity has clinical relevance, as it would imply the possibility of improving recovery with specific interventions applied at the time of reperfusion. In 1985, Rahimtoola described another possible outcome of myocardial ischemia. He demonstrated that late reperfusion (after months or even years) of an ischemic area showing ventricular wall-motion abnormalities might restore normal metabolism and function. He was the first to introduce the term "hibernating myocardium," referring to ischemic myocardium wherein the myocytes remain viable but in which contraction is chronically depressed. In this article we review our data on metabolic changes occurring during ischemia followed by reperfusion, obtained either in the isolated and perfused rabbit hearts or in ischemic heart disease patients undergoing intracoronary thrombolysis or aortocoronary bypass grafting.
心肌缺血这一术语描述的是心脏中氧的分数摄取不足以维持细胞氧化速率时所存在的一种状况。这会导致极其复杂的情况,近年来已对此进行了广泛研究。实验研究一直致力于确定导致心肌细胞坏死的生化事件的精确顺序,因为此类知识可能会带来旨在延缓心肌细胞死亡的合理治疗方法。目前,对于是什么决定细胞死亡以及再灌注后细胞功能无法恢复这一问题,尚无简单答案。出现问题的原因如下:(1)缺血损伤并非均匀一致,许多因素可能共同导致细胞死亡;(2)生化变化的严重程度与坏死的发展通常相关联(这两个过程均取决于缺血持续时间),且无法建立因果关系;(3)坏死的必然性只能通过对缺血心肌进行再灌注来评估。然而,血流恢复可能会导致许多其他负面后果,从而直接影响恢复程度。从临床角度来看,我们最近了解到心肌缺血和再灌注存在几种潜在的表现及后果。毫无疑问,缺血区的心室功能障碍(收缩期或舒张期)是缺血最可靠的临床体征,因为心电图变化和症状往往并不存在。缺血诱导的心室功能障碍,至少在最初是可逆的,因为心肌的早期再灌注会导致正常代谢和收缩功能的恢复。在缺血区,收缩功能的恢复可能会立即发生,或者更常见的是会有相当长的延迟,从而产生了最近被认为是“顿抑”心肌的状况。另一方面,当缺血严重且持续时间较长时,可能会发生细胞死亡。在此阶段进行再灌注会伴随着细胞内酶的释放、细胞膜的损伤、钙的内流、收缩力的持续降低以及至少部分组织最终的坏死。那些认为大部分损伤是再灌注瞬间发生的事件的后果而非缺血期间发生变化的结果的人,将这种情况称为“再灌注损伤”。然而,再灌注损伤的存在受到了质疑,有人认为,除了诱发心律失常外,很难确定再灌注是否会导致进一步的损伤。这种情况的存在具有临床相关性,因为这意味着有可能通过在再灌注时应用特定干预措施来改善恢复情况。1985年,拉希姆图拉描述了心肌缺血的另一种可能结果。他证明,对出现心室壁运动异常的缺血区域进行晚期再灌注(数月甚至数年之后)可能会恢复正常代谢和功能。他是第一个引入“冬眠心肌”这一术语的人,指的是其中心肌细胞仍然存活但收缩功能长期受到抑制的缺血心肌。在本文中,我们回顾了我们关于在缺血后再灌注期间发生的代谢变化的数据,这些数据是在离体灌注兔心脏中或在接受冠状动脉内溶栓或主动脉冠状动脉旁路移植术的缺血性心脏病患者中获得的。