Chen Y S, Marshall S A, Winokur P L, Coffman S L, Wilke W W, Murray P R, Spiegel C A, Pfaller M A, Doern G V, Jones R N
Departments of Pathology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 1998 Oct;36(10):2996-3001. doi: 10.1128/JCM.36.10.2996-3001.1998.
Modified MicroScan gram-positive MIC no. 8 panels (PM-8) were analyzed for their improved ability to detect vancomycin resistance (VR) and high-level aminoglycoside resistance (HLAR) in enterococci. A validation study design that utilized selected challenge strains, recent clinical isolates, and reproducibility experiments in a multicenter format was selected. Three independent medical centers compared the commercial panels to reference broth microdilution panels (RBM) and Synergy Quad Agar (QA). Resistance was verified by demonstration of VR and HLAR genes by PCR tests. The study was conducted in three phases. (i) In the challenge phase (CP), two well-characterized sets of enterococci were obtained from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; one set contained 50 isolates for VR testing and one contained 48 isolates for HLAR testing. In addition, a set of 47 well-characterized isolates representing diverse geographic areas, obtained from earlier national surveillance studies, was tested at the University of Iowa College of Medicine (UICM). (ii) In the efficacy phase (EP), each laboratory tested 50 recent, unique clinical isolates by all methods. (iii) In the reproducibility Phase (RP), each laboratory tested the same 10 strains by all methods in triplicate on three separate days. All isolates from the EP were sent to the UICM for molecular characterization of vanA, -B, -C1, -C2-3, and HLAR genes. In the CP, the ranking of test methods by error rates (in parentheses; very major and major errors combined, versus PCR results) were as follows: for high-level streptomycin resistance (HLSR), QA (12.0%) > PM-8 (5.2%) > RBM (1.6%); for high-level gentamicin resistance (HLGR), RBM (3.7%) > PM-8 (3.1%) > QA (2.6%); and for VR, RBM = QA (3.0%) > PM-8 (1.2%). In the EP, agreement between all methods and the reference PCR result was 98.0% for HLSR, 99.3% for HLGR, and 98. 6% for VR. In the RP, the percentages of results +/- 1 log2 dilution of the all-participant mode were as follows: for VR, 100% (PM-8), 98.9% (QA), and 90.0% (RBM); for HLSR, 99.6% (RBM), 98.5% (PM-8), and 82.2% (QA); and for HLGR, 99.6% (RBM), 99.3% (PM-8), and 98.1% (QA). The ability of the PM-8 to detect VR and HLAR in enterococci was comparable to those for reference susceptibility and molecular PCR methods and was considered acceptable for routine clinical laboratory use.
对改良的微量扫描革兰氏阳性菌 MIC 编号 8 板(PM - 8)进行了分析,以评估其在检测肠球菌中万古霉素耐药性(VR)和高水平氨基糖苷类耐药性(HLAR)方面的改进能力。选择了一种验证研究设计,该设计采用选定的挑战菌株、近期临床分离株,并以多中心形式进行重复性实验。三个独立的医学中心将商业板与参考肉汤微量稀释板(RBM)和协同四联琼脂(QA)进行了比较。通过 PCR 试验证明 VR 和 HLAR 基因来验证耐药性。该研究分三个阶段进行。(i)在挑战阶段(CP),从疾病控制与预防中心获得了两组特征明确的肠球菌;一组包含 50 株用于 VR 检测的分离株,另一组包含 48 株用于 HLAR 检测的分离株。此外,从早期全国监测研究中获得的一组代表不同地理区域的 47 株特征明确的分离株在爱荷华大学医学院(UICM)进行了检测。(ii)在效能阶段(EP),每个实验室通过所有方法检测 50 株近期的、独特的临床分离株。(iii)在重复性阶段(RP),每个实验室在三个不同的日子里对相同的 10 株菌株进行三次重复检测。来自 EP 的所有分离株被送往 UICM 进行 vanA、-B、-C1、-C2 - 3 和 HLAR 基因的分子特征分析。在 CP 中,按错误率(括号内;非常主要和主要错误合并,与 PCR 结果相比)对检测方法的排名如下:对于高水平链霉素耐药性(HLSR),QA(12.0%)> PM - 8(5.2%)> RBM(1.6%);对于高水平庆大霉素耐药性(HLGR),RBM(3.7%)> PM - 8(3.1%)> QA(2.6%);对于 VR,RBM = QA(3.0%)> PM - 8(1.2%)。在 EP 中,所有方法与参考 PCR 结果之间的一致性对于 HLSR 为 98.0%,对于 HLGR 为 99.3%,对于 VR 为 98.6%。在 RP 中,与所有参与者模式的结果相差±1 log2 稀释度的百分比如下:对于 VR,PM - 8 为