Teret S P, Webster D W, Vernick J S, Smith T W, Leff D, Wintemute G J, Cook P J, Hawkins D F, Kellermann A L, Sorenson S B, DeFrancesco S
Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Policy and Research, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
N Engl J Med. 1998 Sep 17;339(12):813-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199809173391206.
New policy options are emerging in the debate regarding the regulation of firearms in the United States. These options include the treatment of firearms as consumer products, the design of which can be regulated for safety; denial of gun ownership to those convicted of misdemeanors; and strategies to curtail the illegal sale of guns. The public's opinion of these innovative gun-policy options has not been thoroughly assessed.
We conducted two telephone surveys of 1200 adults each in the United States in 1996 and 1997-1998. Cognitive interviews and pretests were used in the development of the survey instruments. Potential participants were then contacted by random-digit dialing of telephone numbers.
A majority of the respondents favored safety standards for new handguns. These standards included childproofing (favored by 88 percent of respondents), personalization (devices that permit firing only by an authorized person; 71 percent), magazine safeties (devices that prevent firing after the magazine or clip is removed; 82 percent), and loaded-chamber indicators (devices that show whether the handgun is loaded; 73 percent). There was strong support for policies prohibiting persons convicted of specific misdemeanors from purchasing a firearm. Support for such prohibitions was strongest for crimes involving violence or the illegal use of a firearm (83 to 95 percent) or substance abuse (71 to 92 percent). There was also widespread support for policies designed to reduce the illegal sale of guns, such as mandatory tamper-resistant serial numbers (90 percent), a limit of one handgun purchase per customer per month (81 percent), and mandatory registration of handguns (82 percent). Even among the subgroup of respondents who were gun owners, a majority were in favor of stricter gun regulations with regard to 20 of the 22 proposals covered in the poll.
Strong public support, even among gun owners, for innovative strategies to regulate firearms suggests that these proposals warrant serious consideration by policy makers.
在美国关于枪支管制的辩论中,新的政策选择正在出现。这些选择包括将枪支视为消费品,其设计可因安全原因受到监管;拒绝将枪支所有权给予被判轻罪的人;以及减少枪支非法销售的策略。公众对这些创新性枪支政策选择的看法尚未得到全面评估。
我们在1996年以及1997 - 1998年对美国1200名成年人各进行了两次电话调查。在调查工具的开发过程中使用了认知访谈和预测试。然后通过随机拨打电话号码联系潜在参与者。
大部分受访者赞成对新手枪制定安全标准。这些标准包括儿童安全设计(88%的受访者赞成)、个性化(仅允许授权人员开火的装置;71%)、弹匣保险(弹匣或弹夹取出后防止开火的装置;82%)以及膛内有弹指示器(显示手枪是否有子弹的装置;73%)。对于禁止被判特定轻罪的人购买枪支的政策有强烈支持。对于涉及暴力或非法使用枪支(83%至95%)或药物滥用(71%至92%)的犯罪,对此类禁令的支持最为强烈。对于旨在减少枪支非法销售的政策也有广泛支持,例如强制使用防篡改序列号(90%)、每位顾客每月限购一支手枪(81%)以及手枪强制登记(82%)。即使在枪支拥有者的受访者子群体中,大多数人也赞成对民意调查涵盖的22项提议中的20项实行更严格的枪支管制。
即使在枪支拥有者中,公众对创新性枪支管制策略也有强烈支持,这表明这些提议值得政策制定者认真考虑。