Suppr超能文献

氯巴占作为儿童癫痫的单一疗法,其疗效与卡马西平和苯妥英相当。加拿大儿童癫痫研究小组。

Clobazam has equivalent efficacy to carbamazepine and phenytoin as monotherapy for childhood epilepsy. Canadian Study Group for Childhood Epilepsy.

出版信息

Epilepsia. 1998 Sep;39(9):952-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1998.tb01444.x.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the effectiveness of monotherapy clobazam (CLB) to carbamazepine (CBZ) and phenytoin (PHT) in children with epilepsy.

METHODS

Children aged 2-16 years with newly diagnosed epilepsy or previous failure of one drug (for poor efficacy or side effects) were assigned to one of two study arms and then randomized--CLB versus CBZ or CLB versus PHT. Eligible children had partial epilepsies or only generalized tonic-clonic seizures. After a drug initiation protocol, monotherapy treatment mimicked the usual routines used by Canadian child neurologists. Blinding used a "double dummy" technique with blinded medication serum levels (6-point scale). Intention to treat analysis using survival curves assessed the primary endpoint--length of retention on the initial medication during the year after randomization.

RESULTS

Fifteen centers entered 235 patients: 159 randomized to CLB versus CBZ and 76 to CLB versus PHT. Altogether, in all study arms, 119 received CLB, 78 CBZ, and 38 PHT. Overall, 56% continued to receive the original medication for 1 year with no difference between CLB and standard therapy (CBZ and PHT). Seizure control was equivalent for all three medications, as were side effects. PHT and CBZ induced more biologic side effects, such as rash, while CLB induced slightly more behavioral effects. Tolerance developed in 7.5% of patients receiving CLB, 4.2% with CBZ and 6.7% with PHT.

CONCLUSIONS

CLB should be considered as "first line" monotherapy along with CBZ and PHT for all partial and selected generalized childhood epilepsies.

摘要

目的

比较氯巴占(CLB)单药治疗与卡马西平(CBZ)和苯妥英(PHT)治疗儿童癫痫的有效性。

方法

将2至16岁新诊断为癫痫或曾因疗效不佳或出现副作用而对一种药物治疗失败的儿童分配到两个研究组之一,然后进行随机分组——CLB与CBZ对比,或CLB与PHT对比。符合条件的儿童患有部分性癫痫或仅为全身强直阵挛性发作。在启动药物治疗方案后,单药治疗模仿加拿大儿童神经科医生的常规做法。采用“双盲”技术进行盲法治疗,同时对药物血清水平进行盲法评估(6分制)。使用生存曲线进行意向性分析,评估主要终点——随机分组后一年内初始药物的持续使用时间。

结果

15个中心纳入了235例患者:159例随机分为CLB与CBZ对比组,76例随机分为CLB与PHT对比组。总共有119例在所有研究组中接受CLB治疗,78例接受CBZ治疗,38例接受PHT治疗。总体而言,56%的患者持续接受原药物治疗1年,CLB与标准治疗(CBZ和PHT)之间无差异。三种药物的癫痫控制效果相当,副作用也相当。PHT和CBZ引起的生物学副作用更多,如皮疹,而CLB引起的行为方面的副作用略多。接受CLB治疗的患者中有7.5%产生耐受性,接受CBZ治疗的为4.2%,接受PHT治疗的为6.7%。

结论

对于所有部分性和特定的全身性儿童癫痫,CLB应与CBZ和PHT一起被视为“一线”单药治疗药物。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验