Utley D S, Utley J D, Koch R J, Goode R L
Department of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, California 94305-5328, USA.
Laryngoscope. 1998 Sep;108(9):1338-45. doi: 10.1097/00005537-199809000-00015.
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Mandibular fracture treatment often includes arch bar maxillomandibular fixation (MMF), either alone or in combination with open reduction/internal fixation (ORIF) techniques. The glove perforation rate associated with arch bar placement, the incidence of blood-borne pathogen positivity in facial fracture patients, and the injurious effects of arch bars on dental enamel and gingiva have prompted the development of safer alternatives to arch bar MMF. This study evaluates the efficacy, ease of use, and safety profile of one such alternative: orthodontic direct bonded bracket fixation (MMF/DBB).
Prospective study of consecutive mandible fracture patients treated with MMF/DBB.
Thirty-two patients with mandibular fractures were evaluated from January 1994 to July 1997. Fourteen were appropriate for treatment with MMF/DBB (12 men and two woman; mean age, 24.6+/-7.2 y; range, 16-42 y). Fracture sites included symphysis, angle, condylar neck, coronoid, and body. Nine patients underwent MMF/DBB alone; five underwent MMF/DBB with subsequent ORIF.
No infection, malocclusion, malunion/nonunion, or enamel/ gingiva injury occurred. Mean follow-up was 6 months (range, 1-12 mo). Oral hygiene with MMF/DBB was superior to historical controls using arch bars.
MMF/DBB can serve as the single treatment method with satisfactory results in patients with favorable, less complicated mandible fractures, although with increased experience, we have treated several more complex cases with MMF/DBB alone. In cases necessitating ORIF, MMF/DBB can be performed preoperatively to align fracture segments and reestablish occlusion. This facilitates placement of osteosynthesis plates and reduces ORIF operative time. MMF/DBB is an economical, safe technique that minimizes blood-borne-pathogen risk to the operative team, eliminates periodontal injury, facilitates postoperative dental hygiene, and is painless to apply and remove.
目的/假设:下颌骨骨折的治疗通常包括牙弓夹板颌间固定(MMF),可单独使用,也可与切开复位/内固定(ORIF)技术联合使用。与牙弓夹板放置相关的手套穿孔率、面部骨折患者血源性病原体阳性的发生率以及牙弓夹板对牙釉质和牙龈的损伤作用促使人们开发更安全的牙弓夹板颌间固定替代方法。本研究评估了一种替代方法——正畸直接粘结托槽固定(MMF/DBB)的疗效、易用性和安全性。
对接受MMF/DBB治疗的连续性下颌骨骨折患者进行前瞻性研究。
1994年1月至1997年7月对32名下颌骨骨折患者进行评估。其中14例适合采用MMF/DBB治疗(12名男性和2名女性;平均年龄24.6±7.2岁;范围16 - 42岁)。骨折部位包括颏部、角部、髁突颈部、喙突和体部。9例患者单独接受MMF/DBB治疗;5例患者先接受MMF/DBB治疗,随后进行ORIF。
未发生感染、咬合不正、骨不连/骨愈合不良或牙釉质/牙龈损伤。平均随访6个月(范围1 - 12个月)。采用MMF/DBB时的口腔卫生状况优于使用牙弓夹板的历史对照。
MMF/DBB可作为治疗情况良好、复杂性较低的下颌骨骨折患者的单一治疗方法,且效果令人满意,尽管随着经验增加,我们已单独用MMF/DBB治疗了几例更复杂的病例。在需要进行ORIF的病例中,可在术前进行MMF/DBB以对齐骨折段并重建咬合。这便于放置接骨板并减少ORIF手术时间。MMF/DBB是一种经济、安全的技术,可将手术团队感染血源性病原体的风险降至最低,消除牙周损伤,便于术后口腔卫生护理,且应用和拆除时无痛。