Suppr超能文献

[膝关节韧带的磁共振成像:在关节镜检查对照患者队列中关于半月板和前交叉韧带的误差分析]

[MRI of knee ligaments: error analysis with reference to meniscus and anterior cruciate ligaments in an arthroscopic controlled patient cohort].

作者信息

Kreitner K F, Runkel M, Herrig A, Regentrop H J, Grebe P

机构信息

Klinik und Poliklinik für Radiologie, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, Mainz.

出版信息

Rofo. 1998 Aug;169(2):157-62. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1015067.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To categorise discrepancies in findings of the menisci and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) between arthroscopy and MRI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The MRIs of 236 patients were retrospectively analysed by an experienced radiologist without knowledge of clinical and/or operative findings. Discrepancies in arthroscopic findings were reevaluated together with the arthroscopist to determine their cause of error.

RESULTS

The diagnostic accuracies for injuries of the medial and lateral meniscus and the ACL were 92.4%, 92.4%, and 94.1%, respectively. For the menisci, causes for discrepancies in findings (n = 31) were: overinterpretation of central signal intensities with contact to the meniscal surface but without disturbance of the meniscal contour as a tear (n = 12), insufficient arthroscopie evaluation of the knee joint (n = 11), overlooked tears on MR imaging (n = 6), misinterpretation of normal anatomic structures (n = 1), "magic angle" phenomenon (n = 1), and missed tears at MRI (n = 1). Causes for discrepancies for the ACL (n = 18) were: nearly complete versus complete rupture either at MRI or arthroscopy and vice versa (n = 9), insufficient arthroscopic evaluation (n = 6), insufficient MRI technique (n = 2), and overlooked tear on MR imaging (n = 1).

CONCLUSIONS

Discrepant findings between MRI and arthroscopy may be also due to an insufficient arthroscopic evaluation in clinical routine. The close cooperation between surgeons and radiologists improves the understanding of the methods of each other.

摘要

目的

对关节镜检查与磁共振成像(MRI)在半月板和前交叉韧带(ACL)检查结果上的差异进行分类。

材料与方法

由一位经验丰富的放射科医生在不了解临床和/或手术结果的情况下,对236例患者的MRI进行回顾性分析。与关节镜医生一起重新评估关节镜检查结果中的差异,以确定其误差原因。

结果

内侧半月板、外侧半月板和ACL损伤的诊断准确率分别为92.4%、92.4%和94.1%。对于半月板,检查结果存在差异的原因(n = 31)包括:对半月板表面有接触但半月板轮廓未受干扰的中央信号强度过度解读为撕裂(n = 12)、膝关节关节镜评估不足(n = 11)、MRI成像上遗漏撕裂(n = 6)、对正常解剖结构的错误解读(n = 1)、“魔角”现象(n = 1)以及MRI检查时遗漏撕裂(n = 1)。ACL检查结果存在差异的原因(n = 18)包括:MRI或关节镜检查时近乎完全断裂与完全断裂的差异(n = 9)、关节镜评估不足(n = 6)、MRI技术不足(n = 2)以及MRI成像上遗漏撕裂(n = 1)。

结论

MRI与关节镜检查结果存在差异也可能是由于临床常规关节镜评估不足所致。外科医生与放射科医生之间的密切合作有助于增进彼此对检查方法的理解。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验