Gjersøe P, Andersen S E, Mølbak A G, Wulff H R, Thomsen O O
Medicinsk gastroenterologisk afdeling C, Amtssygehuset i Herlev.
Ugeskr Laeger. 1998 Aug 24;160(35):5030-4.
The aim of the study was to assess the reproducibility when different doctors fill in diagnoses on death certificates. Records from 40 patients who had died in 1994 during admission to a medical hospital department in Denmark were selected at random. Ten doctors filled in a death certificate for each patient (without knowledge of autopsy findings and results of examinations received after the patient's death). The agreement between the diagnoses was assessed using a rating scale with seven categories. Afterwards the 400 death certificates were mixed and coded by the Medicostatistical Section of the Danish National Board of Health. The diagnoses made by the ten doctors showed insignificant discrepancies in ten cases, larger discrepancies were found in eight cases and large discrepancies in 19 cases. In three cases the patient had died suddenly and little information was available. The coding was standardized at the Danish National Board of Health, but their diagnoses reflected the discrepancies between the doctors' diagnoses. In conclusion, the reproducibility of diagnoses on death certificates is so poor that information from the Registry of Causes of Death is of little use of administrative or scientific purposes.
该研究的目的是评估不同医生填写死亡证明诊断信息时的可重复性。随机选取了1994年在丹麦一家医院内科住院期间死亡的40名患者的记录。十位医生为每位患者填写一份死亡证明(不知道尸检结果以及患者死亡后获得的检查结果)。使用具有七个类别的评定量表评估诊断之间的一致性。之后,丹麦国家卫生局医学统计科将这400份死亡证明进行混合和编码。十位医生做出的诊断在10例中差异不显著,8例中差异较大,19例中差异很大。有3例患者突然死亡,几乎没有可用信息。丹麦国家卫生局对编码进行了标准化处理,但他们的诊断反映了医生诊断之间的差异。总之,死亡证明上诊断的可重复性很差,以至于死因登记处的信息对于行政或科学目的几乎没有用处。