Lakkireddy Dhanunjaya R, Basarakodu Krishnamohan R, Vacek James L, Kondur Ashok K, Ramachandruni Srikanth K, Esterbrooks Dennis J, Markert Ronald J, Gowda Manohar S
Mid America Cardiology, University of Kansas, KU Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Apr;22(4):544-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-006-0071-6.
The death certificate is an important medical document that impacts mortality statistics and health care policy. Resident physician accuracy in completing death certificates is poor. We assessed the impact of two educational interventions on the quality of death certificate completion by resident physicians. Two-hundred and nineteen internal medicine residents were asked to complete a cause of death statement using a sample case of in-hospital death. Participants were randomized into one of two educational interventions: either an interactive workshop (group I) or provided with printed instruction material (group II). A total of 200 residents completed the study, with 100 in each group. At baseline, competency in death certificate completion was poor. Only 19% of residents achieved an optimal test score. Sixty percent erroneously identified a cardiac cause of death. The death certificate score improved significantly in both group I (14+/-6 vs 24+/-5, p<0.001) and group II (14+/-5 vs 19+/-5, p<0.001) postintervention from baseline. Group I had a higher degree of improvement than group II (24+/-5 vs 19+/-5, p<0.001). Resident physicians' skills in death certificate completion can be improved with an educational intervention. An interactive workshop is a more effective intervention than a printed handout.
死亡证明是一份重要的医学文件,会影响死亡率统计和医疗保健政策。住院医师填写死亡证明的准确性较差。我们评估了两种教育干预措施对住院医师填写死亡证明质量的影响。219名内科住院医师被要求使用一个院内死亡的样本病例填写一份死因声明。参与者被随机分为两种教育干预措施之一:要么参加一个互动研讨会(第一组),要么获得印刷的指导材料(第二组)。共有200名住院医师完成了研究,每组100人。在基线时,填写死亡证明的能力较差。只有19%的住院医师获得了最佳测试分数。60%的人错误地将死因认定为心脏原因。干预后,第一组(14±6对24±5,p<0.001)和第二组(14±5对19±5,p<0.001)的死亡证明分数与基线相比均有显著提高。第一组的改善程度高于第二组(24±5对19±5,p<0.001)。通过教育干预可以提高住院医师填写死亡证明的技能。互动研讨会是比印刷手册更有效的干预措施。