Ostergaard L, Johannsen P, Høst-Poulsen P, Vestergaard-Poulsen P, Asboe H, Gee A D, Hansen S B, Cold G E, Gjedde A, Gyldensted C
Department of Neuroradiology, Arhus University Hospital, Denmark.
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1998 Sep;18(9):935-40. doi: 10.1097/00004647-199809000-00002.
In six young, healthy volunteers, a novel method to determine cerebral blood flow (CBF) using magnetic resonance (MR) bolus tracking was compared with [(15)O]H2O positron emission tomography (PET). The method yielded parametric CBF images with tissue contrast in good agreement with parametric PET CBF images. Introducing a common conversion factor, MR CBF values could be converted into absolute flow rates, allowing comparison of CBF values among normal subjects.
在6名年轻健康志愿者中,将一种使用磁共振(MR)团注追踪测定脑血流量(CBF)的新方法与[(15)O]H2O正电子发射断层扫描(PET)进行了比较。该方法生成的参数化CBF图像与参数化PET CBF图像在组织对比度方面具有良好的一致性。引入一个通用转换因子后,MR CBF值可以转换为绝对流速,从而能够比较正常受试者之间的CBF值。