• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两个半球对句子语境和词汇歧义的解析

Sentence context and lexical ambiguity resolution by the two hemispheres.

作者信息

Faust M, Chiarello C

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-gan, Israel.

出版信息

Neuropsychologia. 1998 Sep;36(9):827-35. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(98)00042-6.

DOI:10.1016/s0028-3932(98)00042-6
PMID:9740356
Abstract

A lexical decision experiment investigated hemisphere asymmetries in resolving lexical ambiguity within a sentence context. Sentences that biased a single meaning (either dominant or subordinate) of sentence-final ambiguous words were followed by a lateralized target related to the sentence-congruent or -incongruent meaning of the ambiguous word, or an unrelated word. In the RVF sentence-congruent targets were facilitated, while incongruent targets were not primed. In contrast, related targets were facilitated in the LVF, regardless of sentence context. This suggests that selecting the contextually appropriate word meaning requires the left hemisphere, and supports a right hemisphere role in maintaining alternate word senses.

摘要

一项词汇判断实验研究了在句子语境中解决词汇歧义时的半球不对称性。偏向句末歧义单词单一意义(主导或从属)的句子后面跟着一个与歧义单词的句子一致或不一致意义相关的侧化目标,或者一个无关单词。在右视野中,与句子一致的目标得到促进,而不一致的目标没有被启动。相比之下,无论句子语境如何,左视野中的相关目标都得到促进。这表明选择符合语境的词义需要左半球,并支持右半球在维持替代词义方面的作用。

相似文献

1
Sentence context and lexical ambiguity resolution by the two hemispheres.两个半球对句子语境和词汇歧义的解析
Neuropsychologia. 1998 Sep;36(9):827-35. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(98)00042-6.
2
Hemispheric sensitivities to lexical and contextual information: evidence from lexical ambiguity resolution.大脑半球对词汇和语境信息的敏感性:来自词汇歧义消解的证据。
Brain Lang. 2008 May;105(2):71-82. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2007.09.004. Epub 2007 Oct 31.
3
The divided visual world paradigm: eye tracking reveals hemispheric asymmetries in lexical ambiguity resolution.分离视觉世界范式:眼动追踪揭示词汇歧义消解中的半球不对称性。
Brain Res. 2008 Jul 30;1222:166-83. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.05.033. Epub 2008 May 21.
4
Semantic ambiguity processing in sentence context: Evidence from event-related fMRI.句子语境中的语义歧义处理:来自事件相关功能磁共振成像的证据。
Neuroimage. 2007 Feb 1;34(3):1270-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.09.048. Epub 2006 Dec 4.
5
Understanding words in sentence contexts: the time course of ambiguity resolution.在句子语境中理解单词:歧义消解的时间进程。
Brain Lang. 2003 Aug;86(2):326-43. doi: 10.1016/s0093-934x(02)00547-3.
6
Linguistic processes in the two cerebral hemispheres: implications for modularity vs interactionism.大脑两半球的语言加工过程:对模块论与交互作用论的启示
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1995 Apr;17(2):171-92. doi: 10.1080/01688639508405117.
7
The effects of context, meaning frequency, and associative strength on semantic selection: distinct contributions from each cerebral hemisphere.语境、意义频率和联想强度对语义选择的影响:每个大脑半球的不同作用。
Brain Res. 2007 Dec 5;1183:91-108. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.09.007. Epub 2007 Sep 16.
8
Differences in semantic category priming in the left and right cerebral hemispheres under automatic and controlled processing conditions.自动和受控加工条件下左右脑半球语义类别启动的差异。
Neuropsychologia. 1999 Aug;37(9):1071-85. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(98)00156-0.
9
Repetition priming within and between the two cerebral hemispheres.两个大脑半球内部及之间的重复启动效应。
Brain Lang. 2005 Jun;93(3):298-307. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2004.10.009. Epub 2004 Dec 8.
10
Semantically convergent and semantically divergent priming in the cerebral hemispheres: lexical decision and semantic judgment.大脑半球中的语义趋同和语义发散启动:词汇判断与语义判断
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2003 Oct;17(3):585-97. doi: 10.1016/s0926-6410(03)00172-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Interhemispheric interactions in visual word recognition: the role of multiple meanings.视觉单词识别中的半球间相互作用:多重意义的作用。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jul 22;16:1591311. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1591311. eCollection 2025.
2
High-Order Language Processing Difficulties in Patients With Schizophrenia: Cross-linguistic and Cross-cultural Results From the Hindi Version of a Newly Developed Language Test.精神分裂症患者的高阶语言处理困难:一项新开发语言测试的印地语版本的跨语言和跨文化结果
Schizophr Bull Open. 2022 May 2;3(1):sgac029. doi: 10.1093/schizbullopen/sgac029. eCollection 2022 Jan.
3
Global and Specific Profiles of Executive Functioning in Prodromal and Early Psychosis.
前驱期和早期精神病中执行功能的整体及特定概况
Front Psychiatry. 2019 May 21;10:356. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00356. eCollection 2019.
4
Perilesional and homotopic area activation during proverb comprehension after stroke.梗语理解后卒中病灶周边区和同源区的激活。
Brain Behav. 2019 Jan;9(1):e01202. doi: 10.1002/brb3.1202. Epub 2018 Dec 26.
5
Cognitive mechanisms for inferring the meaning of novel signals during symbolisation.符号化过程中推断新信号含义的认知机制。
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 16;13(1):e0189540. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189540. eCollection 2018.
6
S-Ketamine-Induced NMDA Receptor Blockade during Natural Speech Production and Its Implications for Formal Thought Disorder in Schizophrenia: A Pharmaco-fMRI Study.S-氯胺酮诱导的自然言语产生过程中 NMDA 受体阻断及其对精神分裂症形式思维障碍的影响:一项药物 fMRI 研究。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2018 May;43(6):1324-1333. doi: 10.1038/npp.2017.270. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
7
Neural correlates of Korean proverb processing: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study.神经关联的韩国谚语处理:一项功能磁共振成像研究。
Brain Behav. 2017 Sep 12;7(10):e00829. doi: 10.1002/brb3.829. eCollection 2017 Oct.
8
Effects of motion speed in action representations.动作表征中运动速度的影响。
Brain Lang. 2017 May;168:47-56. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2017.01.003. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
9
Hemispheric asymmetry in event knowledge activation during incremental language comprehension: A visual half-field ERP study.增量语言理解过程中事件知识激活的半球不对称性:一项视觉半视野ERP研究。
Neuropsychologia. 2016 Apr;84:252-71. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.02.004. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
10
Spatio-temporal distribution of brain activity associated with audio-visually congruent and incongruent speech and the McGurk Effect.与视听一致和不一致言语以及麦格克效应相关的大脑活动的时空分布。
Brain Behav. 2015 Oct 15;5(11):e00407. doi: 10.1002/brb3.407. eCollection 2015 Nov.