Suppr超能文献

近致命性哮喘患者与对照组的气道壁厚度:高分辨率计算机断层扫描评估

Airway wall thickness in patients with near fatal asthma and control groups: assessment with high resolution computed tomographic scanning.

作者信息

Awadh N, Müller N L, Park C S, Abboud R T, FitzGerald J M

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Vancouver Hospital and Health Sciences Centre, University of British Columbia, Canada.

出版信息

Thorax. 1998 Apr;53(4):248-53. doi: 10.1136/thx.53.4.248.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Airway wall thickening has been observed in post mortem studies of patients with asthma. Assessment of airway wall thickening by high resolution computed tomographic (HRCT) scanning has been reported in experimental studies. We have used HRCT scanning to measure airway wall thickness at the segmental and subsegmental levels in 40 patients with asthma and 14 normal controls.

METHODS

The subjects were prospectively divided into four age and sex matched groups: 14 patients with a history of near fatal attack of asthma (NFA; group 1), 12 patients with moderate asthma (group 2), 13 patients with mild asthma (group 3), and 14 normal controls (group 4). All subjects were non-smokers. High resolution (1 mm collimation) CT scans of the chest were done at five different levels.

RESULTS

The mean (SD) forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) was 68 (20)% of predicted for group 1, 73 (12)% for group 2, 102 (12)% for group 3, and 103 (12)% for group 4. The ratio of airway wall thickness to outer diameter (T/D) and the percentage wall area (WA%) defined as (wall area/total airway area) x 100 were used to compare airway wall thickness between the groups. The mean (SD) T/D and WA% were 0.27 (0.05) and 78.0 (9.2)% for group 1, 0.27 (0.05) and 78.8 (9.2)% for group 2, 0.25 (0.04) and 74.2 (7.5)% for group 3, and 0.23 (0.04) and 70.9 (8.2)% for group 4. T/D and WA% were not significantly different between groups 1 and 2. However, both groups 1 and 2 had higher T/D and WA% than either group 3 or 4 (p < 0.001) and group 3 had a higher T/D and WA% than group 4 (p < 0.03). The differences (95% CI) between the groups in WA% were 7.1% (0 to 14.4) for groups 1 and 4, 3.8% (-3.4 to 10) for groups 1 and 3, and 3.3% (-4.4 to 10) for groups 3 and 4. The differences between the groups in T/D and WA% were noted both for those with airways with a luminal diameter of > 2 mm and those with a luminal diameter of < or = 2 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

All the patient groups had greater airway wall thickening than the normal subjects as assessed by HRCT scanning, but patients with more severe asthma had greater airway wall thickening than those with mild asthma. The methodology described in this study may be useful in assessing airway calibre in early intervention studies with anti-inflammatory therapy.

摘要

背景

在哮喘患者的尸检研究中观察到气道壁增厚。在实验研究中已报道了通过高分辨率计算机断层扫描(HRCT)评估气道壁增厚情况。我们使用HRCT扫描测量了40例哮喘患者和14名正常对照者节段和亚节段水平的气道壁厚度。

方法

将受试者前瞻性地分为四个年龄和性别匹配的组:14例有濒死性哮喘发作史的患者(NFA;第1组),12例中度哮喘患者(第2组),13例轻度哮喘患者(第3组),以及14名正常对照者(第4组)。所有受试者均不吸烟。在五个不同层面进行胸部高分辨率(1毫米准直)CT扫描。

结果

第1组一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)的均值(标准差)为预测值的68(20)%,第2组为73(12)%,第3组为102(12)%,第4组为103(12)%。气道壁厚度与外径之比(T/D)以及定义为(壁面积/气道总面积)×100的壁面积百分比(WA%)用于比较各组间气道壁厚度。第1组T/D和WA%的均值(标准差)分别为0.27(0.05)和78.0(9.2)%,第2组为0.27(0.05)和78.8(9.2)%,第3组为0.25(0.04)和74.2(7.5)%,第4组为0.23(0.04)和70.9(8.2)%。第1组和第2组之间T/D和WA%无显著差异。然而,第1组和第2组的T/D和WA%均高于第3组或第4组(p<0.001),且第3组的T/D和WA%高于第4组(p<0.03)。第1组和第4组之间WA%的差异(95%CI)为7.1%(0至14.4),第1组和第3组之间为3.8%(-3.4至10),第3组和第4组之间为3.3%(-4.4至10)。管腔直径>2毫米的气道以及管腔直径≤2毫米的气道,各组间T/D和WA%均存在差异。

结论

通过HRCT扫描评估,所有患者组的气道壁增厚均比正常受试者更明显,但重度哮喘患者的气道壁增厚比轻度哮喘患者更明显。本研究中描述的方法可能有助于在抗炎治疗的早期干预研究中评估气道管径。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

6
Biologics and airway remodeling in severe asthma.生物制剂与重症哮喘中的气道重塑。
Allergy. 2022 Dec;77(12):3538-3552. doi: 10.1111/all.15473. Epub 2022 Aug 23.

本文引用的文献

4
Fatal asthma.
Annu Rev Med. 1996;47:161-8. doi: 10.1146/annurev.med.47.1.161.
5
Airway edema potentiates airway reactivity.气道水肿会增强气道反应性。
J Appl Physiol (1985). 1995 Oct;79(4):1242-8. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1995.79.4.1242.
6
Computed tomography of the lungs in asthma: influence of disease severity and etiology.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996 Jan;153(1):110-4. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.153.1.8542102.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验