• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

拔牙矫治与非拔牙矫治面部侧貌的对比研究。

A comparative study of facial profiles in extraction and nonextraction treatment.

作者信息

James R D

出版信息

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998 Sep;114(3):265-76. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(98)70208-2.

DOI:10.1016/s0889-5406(98)70208-2
PMID:9743131
Abstract

Evaluation of facial profiles and facial balance is a constant, continuous study and learning process for orthodontists. Tooth movement and proper positioning of the teeth to ensure favorable facial changes and to avoid unfavorable changes should be in the orthodontist's "diagnostic" mind from the very first examination. The continuous controversy concerning extraction of premolar teeth and its supposed effects on the facial profile led to the development of this study, which compares the pretreatment and posttreatment facial profiles of patients who underwent premolar extraction with those of patients who did not undergo extraction. The study comprised 170 consecutively treated patients. One hundred-eight of the patients were treated with premolar extraction, and 62 were treated without premolar extraction. The diagnostic extraction and treatment decisions were based on a total space analysis with differential extraction protocols. The Z-angle (an angular measurement) and the E-value (a linear measurement) were used to quantify and compare the pretreatment and posttreatment profiles of the two groups. Both groups completed treatment within the normal ranges of the profile measurement values with the lip profile position slightly more retrusive in the nonextraction group. The nonextraction group's posttreatment Z-angle was 5.27 degrees greater and the posttreatment E-value was 1.47 mm more negative than that of the extraction group. The extraction group began treatment with greater facial imbalance and had the greatest improvement in facial esthetics.

摘要

对面部轮廓和面部平衡的评估,对于正畸医生来说是一个持续不断的研究和学习过程。从首次检查开始,正畸医生就应在“诊断”思维中考虑牙齿移动以及牙齿的正确定位,以确保面部发生有利变化并避免不利变化。关于拔除前磨牙及其对面部轮廓的假定影响的持续争议,促成了本研究的开展,该研究比较了接受前磨牙拔除治疗的患者与未接受拔除治疗的患者治疗前和治疗后的面部轮廓。该研究纳入了170例连续接受治疗的患者。其中108例患者接受了前磨牙拔除治疗,62例患者未接受前磨牙拔除治疗。诊断性拔牙和治疗决策基于采用差异拔牙方案的全面间隙分析。使用Z角(一种角度测量值)和E值(一种线性测量值)来量化和比较两组患者治疗前和治疗后的面部轮廓。两组患者均在面部轮廓测量值的正常范围内完成治疗,不拔牙组的唇部轮廓位置略为后缩。不拔牙组治疗后的Z角比拔牙组大5.27度,治疗后的E值比拔牙组更负1.47毫米。拔牙组开始治疗时面部失衡更严重,但面部美观改善最大。

相似文献

1
A comparative study of facial profiles in extraction and nonextraction treatment.拔牙矫治与非拔牙矫治面部侧貌的对比研究。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998 Sep;114(3):265-76. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(98)70208-2.
2
Facial changes in extraction and nonextraction patients.拔牙与不拔牙患者的面部变化。
Angle Orthod. 1998 Dec;68(6):539-46. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1998)068<0539:FCIEAN>2.3.CO;2.
3
Esthetic impact of premolar extraction and nonextraction treatments on Korean borderline patients.前磨牙拔除与不拔除治疗对韩国临界病例的美学影响。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Apr;133(4):524-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.04.051.
4
Effects of extraction and nonextraction therapy with air-rotor stripping on facial esthetics in postadolescent borderline patients.空气涡轮刮治术的拔牙与不拔牙治疗对青少年晚期临界病例面部美学的影响
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Apr;133(4):539-49. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.04.052.
5
Long-term profile changes in extraction and nonextraction patients.拔牙与非拔牙患者的长期轮廓变化。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Oct;128(4):450-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.04.034.
6
Treatment and posttreatment changes in patients with Class II, Division 1 malocclusion after extraction and nonextraction treatment.安氏II类1分类错牙合患者拔牙与非拔牙治疗后的治疗及治疗后变化
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997 Jan;111(1):18-27. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(97)70297-x.
7
Effects of orthodontics on the facial profile: a comparison of changes during nonextraction and four premolar extraction treatment.正畸治疗对面部轮廓的影响:非拔牙矫治与拔除四颗前磨牙矫治过程中变化的比较
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993 May;103(5):452-8. doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81796-2.
8
Esthetic perception of facial profile changes after extraction and nonextraction Class II treatment.拔牙与不拔牙矫治安氏Ⅱ类错(牙合)后面型变化的审美评价
Braz Oral Res. 2020 Jan 31;34:e003. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2020.vol34.0003. eCollection 2020.
9
Dentofacial and soft tissue changes in Class II, division 1 cases treated with and without extractions.拔牙与不拔牙治疗的安氏II类1分类病例的牙颌面及软组织变化
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995 Jan;107(1):28-37. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(95)70154-0.
10
Profile changes of patients treated with and without premolar extractions.接受和未接受前磨牙拔除治疗的患者的轮廓变化。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Sep;132(3):324-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.08.045.

引用本文的文献

1
Distinguishing Profiles of Extraction Versus Non-extraction Cases Post-orthodontic Treatment: A Cross-Sectional Study.正畸治疗后拔牙与非拔牙病例的鉴别特征:一项横断面研究。
Cureus. 2024 Oct 18;16(10):e71787. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71787. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
Effect of lower facial height and anteroposterior lip position on esthetic preference for Korean silhouette profiles.下面部高度和唇部前后位置对韩国人侧面轮廓审美偏好的影响。
Korean J Orthod. 2021 Nov 25;51(6):419-427. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2021.51.6.419.
3
Extraction vs. Nonextraction on Soft-Tissue Profile Change in Patients with Malocclusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
正畸治疗中拔牙与不拔牙对软组织侧貌变化影响的系统评价和Meta 分析
Biomed Res Int. 2021 Sep 18;2021:7751516. doi: 10.1155/2021/7751516. eCollection 2021.
4
Soft tissue facial changes among adult females during alignment stage of orthodontic treatment: a 3D geometric morphometric study.正畸治疗排齐阶段成年女性软组织面型变化的三维几何形态测量研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Feb 9;21(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01425-2.
5
Thickness change of masseter muscles and the surrounding soft tissues in female patients during orthodontic treatment: a retrospective study.女性患者正畸治疗中咀嚼肌及周围软组织厚度变化的回顾性研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2020 Jun 29;20(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-01168-6.
6
Do premolar extractions necessarily result in a flat face? No, when properly indicated.拔除前磨牙一定会导致面部扁平吗?不,在有适当指征的情况下不会。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2018 Sep-Oct;23(5):82-92. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.23.5.082-092.bbo.
7
Mesial Stripping of Mandibular Deciduous Canines for Correction of Permanent Lateral Incisors.下颌乳尖牙近中片切术矫治恒侧切牙
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2017 Jul-Sep;10(3):229-233. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-144l. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
8
Comparison of esthetics perception and satisfaction of facial profile among male adolescents and adults with different profiles.不同面部轮廓的男性青少年与成年人对面部轮廓美学感知及满意度的比较。
J Orthod Sci. 2016 Apr-Jun;5(2):47-51. doi: 10.4103/2278-0203.179406.
9
Short-term effects of systematic premolar extraction on lip profile, vertical dimension and cephalometric parameters in borderline patients for extraction therapy--a retrospective cohort study.系统前磨牙拔除对边缘性拔牙患者唇型、垂直向和头影测量参数的短期影响——一项回顾性队列研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2016 May;20(4):865-74. doi: 10.1007/s00784-015-1574-5. Epub 2015 Sep 9.
10
The predictability of dentoskeletal factors for soft-tissue chin strain during lip closure.唇闭合过程中牙颌面因素对软组织颏部应变的可预测性。
Korean J Orthod. 2013 Dec;43(6):279-87. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2013.43.6.279. Epub 2013 Dec 9.