• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[腹腔镜与传统阑尾切除术——关于术后早期并发症的比较]

[Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy--a comparison with reference to early postoperative complications].

作者信息

Barkhausen S, Wullstein C, Gross E

机构信息

1. Chirurgische Abteilung, Allgemeines Krankenhaus Barmbek, Hamburg.

出版信息

Zentralbl Chir. 1998;123(7):858-62.

PMID:9746989
Abstract

OBJECTIVE AND METHODS

To compare the complications of laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) and conventional appendectomy (CA) 930 consecutive patients from 1989 until 1997 were analysed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Conventional appendectomy was performed in 330 patients, laparoscopic in 554 patients and another 46 patients required conversion after laparoscopy. The groups were similar in sex ratio, age and degree of inflammation. Postoperative complications occurred in 8.78%. There were less complications in the LA-group (4.69%) than in the CA-group (13.33%) (p < 0.01), especially wound infections were found less in the LA-group (1.8% vs. 11.21%, p < 0.01). The incidence of intraabdominal abscesses was similar in the LA and CA group (1.44% vs. 1.52%). The differences between the groups are not influenced by complicating appendicitis (perforation or abscess). Systemic complications were similar for LA and CA (0.72% and 0.61%), but were seen more often after conversion (6.52%, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective analysis shows that laparoscopic appendectomy significantly reduces postoperative complications, especially wound infections. The authors consider laparoscopic appendectomy to be the procedure of choice in patients with acute appendicitis.

摘要

目的与方法

为比较腹腔镜阑尾切除术(LA)与传统阑尾切除术(CA)的并发症,对1989年至1997年间连续的930例患者进行回顾性分析。

结果

330例患者接受传统阑尾切除术,554例患者接受腹腔镜手术,另有46例患者在腹腔镜检查后需要中转开腹。两组在性别比例、年龄和炎症程度方面相似。术后并发症发生率为8.78%。LA组(4.69%)的并发症少于CA组(13.33%)(p<0.01),尤其是LA组的伤口感染较少(1.8%对11.21%,p<0.01)。LA组和CA组腹腔内脓肿的发生率相似(1.44%对1.52%)。两组之间的差异不受复杂性阑尾炎(穿孔或脓肿)的影响。LA组和CA组的全身并发症相似(0.72%和0.61%),但在中转开腹后更常见(6.52%,p<0.01)。

结论

这项回顾性分析表明,腹腔镜阑尾切除术显著降低了术后并发症,尤其是伤口感染。作者认为腹腔镜阑尾切除术是急性阑尾炎患者的首选手术方式。

相似文献

1
[Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy--a comparison with reference to early postoperative complications].[腹腔镜与传统阑尾切除术——关于术后早期并发症的比较]
Zentralbl Chir. 1998;123(7):858-62.
2
Effectiveness of laparoscopic approach for acute appendicitis.腹腔镜手术治疗急性阑尾炎的疗效
Osaka City Med J. 2007 Jun;53(1):1-8.
3
Complicated appendicitis in children: is laparoscopic appendectomy appropriate? A comparative study with the open appendectomy--our experience.儿童复杂性阑尾炎:腹腔镜阑尾切除术是否合适?与开腹阑尾切除术的比较研究——我们的经验。
J Pediatr Surg. 2009 Oct;44(10):1924-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.03.037.
4
Complicated appendicitis--is the laparoscopic approach appropriate? A comparative study with the open approach: outcome in a community hospital setting.复杂性阑尾炎——腹腔镜手术方法是否合适?与开放手术方法的比较研究:社区医院环境下的结果
Am Surg. 2007 Aug;73(8):737-41; discussion 741-2.
5
[The rationale of laparoscopic treatment in acute appendiceal disease].[急性阑尾疾病的腹腔镜治疗原理]
Chir Ital. 2000 Mar-Apr;52(2):171-8.
6
[Laparoscopic appendectomy after the learning curve].[学习曲线后的腹腔镜阑尾切除术]
Cir Pediatr. 2008 Jul;21(3):167-72.
7
Comparison of laparoscopic, open, and converted appendectomy for perforated appendicitis.腹腔镜、开放及中转开腹阑尾切除术治疗穿孔性阑尾炎的比较
Surg Endosc. 2001 Jul;15(7):660-2. doi: 10.1007/s004640020072. Epub 2001 May 14.
8
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术治疗复杂性阑尾炎
J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Jul;205(1):60-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.03.017.
9
[Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: which factors influence the decision between the surgical techniques?].[腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术:哪些因素影响手术技术的选择?]
Zentralbl Chir. 2005 Feb;130(1):48-54. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-836240.
10
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: results of a retrospective comparison in an Israeli hospital.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术:以色列一家医院的回顾性比较结果
Isr Med Assoc J. 2002 Feb;4(2):91-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Laparoscopic appendectomy using a polymeric clip to close the appendicular stump.使用聚合物夹闭合阑尾残端的腹腔镜阑尾切除术。
JSLS. 2007 Jan-Mar;11(1):59-62.
2
A prospective, randomized, unicenter study comparing laparoscopic and open treatments of acute appendicitis.一项比较腹腔镜与开放手术治疗急性阑尾炎的前瞻性、随机、单中心研究。
Surg Endosc. 2003 Jul;17(7):1023-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-9112-3. Epub 2003 May 6.