• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多中心试验规划与分析中的一些争议。

Some controversies in planning and analysing multi-centre trials.

作者信息

Senn S

机构信息

Department of Statistical Science, University College London, U.K.

出版信息

Stat Med. 1998;17(15-16):1753-65; discussion 1799-800. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19980815/30)17:15/16<1753::aid-sim977>3.0.co;2-x.

DOI:10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19980815/30)17:15/16<1753::aid-sim977>3.0.co;2-x
PMID:9749445
Abstract

It is shown that a rational approach to planning multi-centre trials will lead to an unequal distribution of patients across centres. Consequently different approaches to estimation will yield different estimates. However, some such approaches are not reasonable and it is concluded that multi-centre trials are less problematic than is commonly supposed.

摘要

结果表明，采用合理的方法规划多中心试验会导致各中心患者分布不均。因此，不同的估计方法会得出不同的估计结果。然而，有些此类方法并不合理，得出的结论是多中心试验的问题比通常认为的要少。

相似文献

1
Some controversies in planning and analysing multi-centre trials.多中心试验规划与分析中的一些争议。
Stat Med. 1998;17(15-16):1753-65; discussion 1799-800. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19980815/30)17:15/16<1753::aid-sim977>3.0.co;2-x.
2
Multi-centre trial analysis revisited.多中心试验分析再探讨。
Stat Med. 1998;17(15-16):1779-97; discussion 1799-800. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19980815/30)17:15/16<1779::aid-sim979>3.0.co;2-7.
3
A comparison of various estimators of a treatment difference for a multi-centre clinical trial.多中心临床试验中治疗差异的各种估计量比较。
Stat Med. 1998;17(15-16):1767-77; discussion 1799-800. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19980815/30)17:15/16<1767::aid-sim978>3.0.co;2-h.
4
Understanding research: 2. Ensuring reliability and validity.理解研究：2. 确保可靠性和有效性。
J Wound Care. 2001 Sep;10(8):329-31. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2001.10.8.26116.
5
An index for assessing blindness in a multi-centre clinical trial: disulfiram for alcohol cessation--a VA cooperative study.一项多中心临床试验中评估失明的指标：用于戒酒的双硫仑——一项退伍军人事务部合作研究
Stat Med. 1996 Jul 15;15(13):1421-34. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960715)15:13<1421::AID-SIM266>3.0.CO;2-H.
6
Adjustments for center in multicenter studies: an overview.多中心研究中的中心调整：概述
Ann Intern Med. 2001 Jul 17;135(2):112-23. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-135-2-200107170-00012.
7
The analysis of continuous outcomes in multi-centre trials with small centre sizes.小样本中心的多中心试验中连续结果的分析。
Stat Med. 2007 Dec 30;26(30):5445-56. doi: 10.1002/sim.3068.
8
Planning the analysis of a breast cancer prevention trial.
Prev Med. 1991 Jan;20(1):109-18. doi: 10.1016/0091-7435(91)90011-r.
9
Methodological advances and plans for improving regulatory success for confirmatory studies.
Stat Med. 1998;17(15-16):1675-90. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19980815/30)17:15/16<1675::aid-sim970>3.0.co;2-c.
10
The sirens' songs of confirmatory sepsis trials: selection bias and sampling error.验证性脓毒症试验的诱人之处：选择偏倚与抽样误差
Crit Care Med. 1998 Dec;26(12):1927-31. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199812000-00001.

引用本文的文献

1
A partially heterogeneous weighted fusion learning method for potential heterogeneous treatment effect in multi-site survival study.一种用于多中心生存研究中潜在异质性治疗效果的部分异质性加权融合学习方法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02612-3.
2
Forced randomization: the what, why, and how.强制随机化：是什么、为什么以及如何进行。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Oct 8;24(1):234. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02340-0.
3
Selecting a randomization method for a multi-center clinical trial with stochastic recruitment considerations.
考虑随机招募因素的多中心临床试验中随机分组方法的选择。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Feb 28;24(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-02131-z.
4
Designing a phase-III time-to-event clinical trial using a modified sample size formula and Poisson-Gamma model for subject accrual that accounts for the lag in site initiation using the PERT distribution.使用修改后的样本量公式和泊松-伽马模型设计 III 期生存时间临床试验，该模型考虑了使用 PERT 分布对站点启动的滞后，以进行受试者入组。
Stat Med. 2023 Dec 30;42(30):5694-5707. doi: 10.1002/sim.9935. Epub 2023 Nov 5.
5
Prospective longitudinal associations between adverse childhood experiences and adult mental health outcomes: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.前瞻性纵向研究不良童年经历与成人心理健康结局的关联：系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
Syst Rev. 2023 Sep 30;12(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02330-1.
6
Concept and development of an interactive tool for trial recruitment planning and management.交互式试验招募规划和管理工具的概念和开发。
Trials. 2021 Mar 6;22(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05112-z.
7
Bayesian accrual modeling and prediction in multicenter clinical trials with varying center activation times.多中心临床试验中具有不同中心激活时间的贝叶斯累积建模与预测
Pharm Stat. 2020 Sep;19(5):692-709. doi: 10.1002/pst.2025. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
8
Conditional moving linear regression: modeling the recruitment process for ALLHAT.条件移动线性回归：对ALLHAT的招募过程进行建模
Commun Stat Theory Methods. 2017;46(18):8943-8951. doi: 10.1080/03610926.2016.1197251. Epub 2017 May 19.
9
Statistical modeling and prediction of clinical trial recruitment.临床试验招募的统计建模与预测。
Stat Med. 2019 Mar 15;38(6):945-955. doi: 10.1002/sim.8036. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
10
How to deal with the Poisson-gamma model to forecast patients' recruitment in clinical trials when there are pauses in recruitment dynamic?当招募动态出现暂停时，如何运用泊松-伽马模型来预测临床试验中患者的招募情况？
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2017 Jan 6;5:144-152. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2017.01.003. eCollection 2017 Mar.