• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Providing evidence of efficacy for a new drug.

作者信息

Ruberg S, Cairns V

机构信息

Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc., Kansas City, MO 64137, USA.

出版信息

Stat Med. 1998;17(15-16):1813-23; discussion 1825-7. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19980815/30)17:15/16<1813::aid-sim983>3.0.co;2-8.

DOI:10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19980815/30)17:15/16<1813::aid-sim983>3.0.co;2-8
PMID:9749449
Abstract

There are many issues to consider when designing an efficacy package for drug registration. Generally in Europe and the United States, two or more confirmatory trials demonstrating efficacy (p < 0.025, one-tailed) of the test treatment versus a suitable control group must be conducted with a priori definition of a primary efficacy endpoint. Exceptions are possible, and there is always extensive discussion whenever less is proposed or more is required. Every aspect of the basic requirement can be questioned: number of trials; choice of control groups; selection of primary efficacy variables(s); levels of significance; one-tailed versus two-tailed test. These issues will be discussed, and justification is given when proposals are made for deviations from standard practice. Differences between Europe and the U.S. are discussed for certain disease entities. Because the assessment of the weight of evidence in favour of a drug effect is difficult to quantitate, if not impossible, no definitive guidance can be given that is suitable for all circumstances and countries.

摘要

相似文献

1
Providing evidence of efficacy for a new drug.
Stat Med. 1998;17(15-16):1813-23; discussion 1825-7. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19980815/30)17:15/16<1813::aid-sim983>3.0.co;2-8.
2
A framework establishing clear decision criteria for the assessment of drug efficacy.一个为药物疗效评估建立明确决策标准的框架。
Stat Med. 1998;17(15-16):1829-38. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19980815/30)17:15/16<1829::aid-sim985>3.0.co;2-k.
3
International Conference on Harmonisation; choice of control group and related issues in clinical trials; availability. Notice.国际协调会议;临床试验中对照组的选择及相关问题;可及性。通知。
Fed Regist. 2001 May 14;66(93):24390-1.
4
[Methodological recommendations of the Regulatory Agencies].[监管机构的方法学建议]
Med Clin (Barc). 2005 Dec 1;125 Suppl 1:72-6. doi: 10.1016/s0025-7753(05)72213-2.
5
Trial design and reporting standards for intra-arterial cerebral thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke.急性缺血性脑卒中动脉内脑溶栓的试验设计与报告标准。
Stroke. 2003 Aug;34(8):e109-37. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000082721.62796.09. Epub 2003 Jul 17.
6
The management of interim analyses in drug development.药物研发中的期中分析管理。
Stat Med. 1998;17(15-16):1801-9; discussion 1811-2. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19980815/30)17:15/16<1801::aid-sim981>3.0.co;2-l.
7
Practical issues in equivalence trials.等效性试验中的实际问题。
Stat Med. 1998;17(15-16):1691-701. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19980815/30)17:15/16<1691::aid-sim971>3.0.co;2-j.
8
International Conference on Harmonisation; guidance on S7A safety pharmacology studies for human pharmaceuticals; availability. Notice.国际协调会议;人用药品S7A安全性药理研究指南;可获取性。通知。
Fed Regist. 2001 Jul 13;66(135):36791-2.
9
'Is this treatment worth while?' How to read the medical journals.“这种治疗值得吗?”如何阅读医学期刊。
S Afr Med J. 2000 Jan;90(1):37-9.
10
Methodological advances and plans for improving regulatory success for confirmatory studies.
Stat Med. 1998;17(15-16):1675-90. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19980815/30)17:15/16<1675::aid-sim970>3.0.co;2-c.

引用本文的文献

1
Emerging Treatments for Disorders of Consciousness in Paediatric Age.小儿期意识障碍的新兴治疗方法。
Brain Sci. 2022 Jan 31;12(2):198. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12020198.
2
Review and comparison of clinical evidence submitted to support European Medicines Agency market authorization of orphan-designated oncological treatments.对提交给欧洲药品管理局以支持孤儿指定肿瘤治疗药物上市许可的临床证据进行审查和比较。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2015 Oct 28;10:139. doi: 10.1186/s13023-015-0349-z.