Wolpaw J R, Ramoser H, McFarland D J, Pfurtscheller G
Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health and the State University of New York, Albany 12201, USA.
IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng. 1998 Sep;6(3):326-33. doi: 10.1109/86.712231.
Humans can learn to control the amplitude of electroencephalographic (EEG) activity in specific frequency bands over sensorimotor cortex and use it to move a cursor to a target on a computer screen. EEG-based communication could provide a new augmentative communication channel for individuals with motor disabilities. In the present system, each dimension of cursor movement is controlled by a linear equation. While the intercept in the equation is continually updated, it does not perfectly eliminate the impact of spontaneous variations in EEG amplitude. This imperfection reduces the accuracy of cursor movement. We evaluated a response verification (RV) procedure in which each outcome is determined by two opposite trials (e.g., one top-target trial and one bottom-target trial). Success, or failure, on both is required for a definitive outcome. The RV procedure reduces errors due to imperfection in intercept selection. Accuracy for opposite-trial pairs exceeds that predicted from the accuracies of individual trials, and greatly exceeds that for same-trial pairs. The RV procedure should be particularly valuable when the first trial has >2 possible targets, because the second trial need only confirm or deny the outcome of the first, and it should be applicable to nonlinear as well as to linear algorithms.
人类能够学会控制感觉运动皮层特定频段的脑电图(EEG)活动幅度,并利用其将光标移动到电脑屏幕上的目标位置。基于脑电图的通信可为运动障碍患者提供一种新的辅助通信渠道。在当前系统中,光标移动的每个维度都由一个线性方程控制。虽然方程中的截距会不断更新,但它并不能完全消除脑电图幅度自发变化的影响。这种不完美降低了光标移动的准确性。我们评估了一种响应验证(RV)程序,其中每个结果由两个相反的试验(例如,一个顶部目标试验和一个底部目标试验)决定。确定结果需要两个试验都成功或都失败。RV程序减少了由于截距选择不完美而导致的误差。相反试验对的准确性超过了根据单个试验准确性预测的值,并且大大超过了相同试验对的准确性。当第一次试验有超过2个可能的目标时,RV程序应该特别有价值,因为第二次试验只需确认或否定第一次试验的结果,并且它应该适用于非线性算法以及线性算法。