• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

病态窦房结综合征患者长期随访期间的房室传导

Atrioventricular conduction during long-term follow-up of patients with sick sinus syndrome.

作者信息

Andersen H R, Nielsen J C, Thomsen P E, Thuesen L, Vesterlund T, Pedersen A K, Mortensen P T

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Skejby Sygehus, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

Circulation. 1998 Sep 29;98(13):1315-21. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.98.13.1315.

DOI:10.1161/01.cir.98.13.1315
PMID:9751681
Abstract

BACKGROUND

It has been claimed that patients with sick sinus syndrome have an increased risk of developing AV block, but this has never been assessed prospectively. The aim of the present study was to evaluate in a prospective trial AV conduction during the long-term follow-up of patients with sick sinus syndrome.

METHODS

Two hundred twenty-five consecutive patients with sick sinus syndrome and intact AV conduction were randomized to undergo single-chamber atrial pacing (110 patients) or single-chamber ventricular pacing (115 patients). Follow-up after 3 months and then yearly included measurement of the PQ interval and, in patients with atrial pacemakers, determination of the atrial stimulus-Q intervals at pacing rates of 100 and 120 bpm. The occurrence of AV block in the atrial group was recorded. During follow-up (mean, 5.5+/-2.4 years), there was no change in PQ interval in either group and no change in atrial stimulus-Q intervals or Wenckebach block point in the atrial group. Four of 110 patients in the atrial group developed grade 2 to 3 AV block that required upgrading of the pacemaker (0.6% per year). Two of these 4 patients had right bundle-branch block at pacemaker implantation.

CONCLUSIONS

AV conduction, estimated as PQ interval and atrial stimulus-Q interval at atrial pacing rates of 100 and 120 bpm and the Wenckebach block point, remains stable during long-term follow-up. Thus, treatment with single-chamber atrial pacing is safe and can be recommended to patients with sick sinus syndrome without bundle-branch block.

摘要

背景

据称,病态窦房结综合征患者发生房室传导阻滞的风险增加,但这从未得到前瞻性评估。本研究的目的是在一项前瞻性试验中评估病态窦房结综合征患者长期随访期间的房室传导情况。

方法

225例连续的房室传导正常的病态窦房结综合征患者被随机分为接受单腔心房起搏(110例患者)或单腔心室起搏(115例患者)。3个月后随访,然后每年随访,包括测量PQ间期,对于植入心房起搏器的患者,测定起搏频率为100次/分和120次/分时的心房刺激-Q间期。记录心房组房室传导阻滞的发生情况。在随访期间(平均5.5±2.4年),两组的PQ间期均无变化,心房组的心房刺激-Q间期或文氏阻滞点也无变化。心房组110例患者中有4例发生2至3度房室传导阻滞,需要升级起搏器(每年0.6%)。这4例患者中有2例在起搏器植入时存在右束支传导阻滞。

结论

以100次/分和120次/分的心房起搏频率下的PQ间期、心房刺激-Q间期以及文氏阻滞点来评估,房室传导在长期随访期间保持稳定。因此,单腔心房起搏治疗是安全的,可推荐给无束支传导阻滞的病态窦房结综合征患者。

相似文献

1
Atrioventricular conduction during long-term follow-up of patients with sick sinus syndrome.病态窦房结综合征患者长期随访期间的房室传导
Circulation. 1998 Sep 29;98(13):1315-21. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.98.13.1315.
2
Stability of AV conduction in sick sinus node syndrome patients with implanted atrial pacemakers.植入心房起搏器的病态窦房结综合征患者的房室传导稳定性
Am Heart J. 1984 Apr;107(4):644-7. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(84)90309-0.
3
Natural history of sinus node disease treated with atrial pacing in 213 patients: implications for selection of stimulation mode.213例接受心房起搏治疗的窦房结疾病自然史:对刺激模式选择的启示
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992 Sep;20(3):633-9. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(92)90018-i.
4
Atrial pacing site and atrioventricular conduction in patients paced for sinus node disease.因窦房结疾病而接受起搏治疗患者的心房起搏部位与房室传导
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014 Nov;25(11):1224-31. doi: 10.1111/jce.12476. Epub 2014 Jul 23.
5
[Results of long-term permanent atrial stimulation in sick sinus disease].[病态窦房结综合征长期永久性心房刺激的结果]
Rev Esp Cardiol. 1997 Jul;50(7):474-9. doi: 10.1016/s0300-8932(97)73253-6.
6
Long-term outcome of single-chamber atrial pacing compared with dual-chamber pacing in patients with sinus-node dysfunction and intact atrioventricular node conduction.窦房结功能障碍且房室结传导功能完好的患者中单腔心房起搏与双腔起搏的长期疗效比较。
Yonsei Med J. 2010 Nov;51(6):832-7. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2010.51.6.832.
7
Atrial demand pacemakers in sick sinus syndrome: an efficient and reliable approach in selected patients.病态窦房结综合征中的心房按需起搏器:特定患者的一种有效且可靠的方法。
J Chin Med Assoc. 2003 Dec;66(12):709-14.
8
Pacing mode survival in patients with single chamber atrial pacemaker for sinus node dysfunction.单腔心房起搏器治疗窦房结功能障碍患者的起搏模式生存率
Indian Heart J. 2024 Jan-Feb;76(1):27-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2023.12.004. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
9
Programming a fixed long atrioventricular delay is not effective in preventing ventricular pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome.
Europace. 1999 Apr;1(2):113-20. doi: 10.1053/eupc.1998.0026.
10
Minimizing ventricular pacing by a novel atrioventricular (AV) delay hysteresis algorithm in patients with intact or compromised intrinsic AV conduction and different atrial and ventricular lead locations.通过一种新的房室(AV)延迟滞后算法,最大限度地减少具有完整或受损内在 AV 传导以及不同心房和心室导联位置的患者的心室起搏。
Ann Med. 2013 Sep;45(5-6):438-45. doi: 10.3109/07853890.2013.801710. Epub 2013 Jun 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-term follow up of single-chamber atrial pacing-system upgrade and Wenckebach block point behavior: potential implications for leadless AAI pacing?单腔心房起搏系统升级及文氏阻滞点行为的长期随访:对无导线AAI起搏的潜在影响?
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2025 May 16. doi: 10.1007/s10840-025-02061-4.
2
Pacing mode survival in patients with single chamber atrial pacemaker for sinus node dysfunction.单腔心房起搏器治疗窦房结功能障碍患者的起搏模式生存率
Indian Heart J. 2024 Jan-Feb;76(1):27-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2023.12.004. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
3
A comparison of AAIR versus DDDR pacing for patients with sinus node dysfunction: a long-term follow-up study.
窦性心动功能障碍患者的 AAIR 与 DDDR 起搏比较:一项长期随访研究。
Cardiovasc J Afr. 2021;32(1):17-20. doi: 10.5830/CVJA-2020-040. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
4
Safety and efficacy of AAIR pacing in selected patients with sick sinus syndrome.AAIR起搏在特定病态窦房结综合征患者中的安全性和有效性。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Oct;97(42):e12833. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012833.
5
Cardiac pacing strategies and post-implantation risk of atrial fibrillation and heart failure events in sinus node dysfunction patients: a collaborative analysis of over 6000 patients.窦房结功能障碍患者的心脏起搏策略及植入后房颤和心力衰竭事件的风险:超过6000例患者的协作分析
Clin Res Cardiol. 2016 Aug;105(8):687-698. doi: 10.1007/s00392-016-0973-1. Epub 2016 Feb 25.
6
Minimizing right ventricular pacing in pacemaker patients with intact and compromised atrioventricular conduction : Results from the EVITA Trial.在房室传导正常和受损的起搏器患者中尽量减少右心室起搏:EVITA试验结果
Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2015 Dec;26(4):359-66. doi: 10.1007/s00399-015-0394-2. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
7
Cardiomyopathy induced by artificial cardiac pacing: myth or reality sustained by evidence?人工心脏起搏诱发的心肌病:是无稽之谈还是有证据支持的现实?
Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2014 Jul-Sep;29(3):402-13. doi: 10.5935/1678-9741.20140104.
8
Non-physiological increase of AV conduction time in sinus disease patients programmed in AAIR-based pacing mode.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2012 Nov;35(2):219-26. doi: 10.1007/s10840-012-9703-4. Epub 2012 Jul 27.
9
Long-term outcome of single-chamber atrial pacing compared with dual-chamber pacing in patients with sinus-node dysfunction and intact atrioventricular node conduction.窦房结功能障碍且房室结传导功能完好的患者中单腔心房起搏与双腔起搏的长期疗效比较。
Yonsei Med J. 2010 Nov;51(6):832-7. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2010.51.6.832.
10
Atrial pacing, the forgotten pacing mode.心房起搏,被遗忘的起搏模式。
Neth Heart J. 2008 Oct;16(Suppl 1):S25-7.