• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

性别与谈判者竞争力:一项元分析

Gender and Negotiator Competitiveness: A Meta-analysis.

作者信息

Walters AE, Stuhlmacher AF, Meyer LL

机构信息

DePaul University

出版信息

Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1998 Oct;76(1):1-29. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2797.

DOI:10.1006/obhd.1998.2797
PMID:9756737
Abstract

Although there have been numerous investigations into the relationship between gender and bargaining competitiveness over the past several decades, few conclusions have been reached. The results of 62 research reports on the relationship between gender and competitive behavior in dyadic bargaining interactions were examined by meta-analytic review. The average weighted effect size indicated that women appear to behave more cooperatively in negotiations than men, but this difference is slight. Results suggest that constraints on negotiators (imposed by abstract bargaining paradigms and restrictions on communication) lessen gender differences in negotiation behavior. Women were significantly more competitive than men when competing against an opponent who pursued a "tit-for-tat" bargaining strategy. Copyright 1998 Academic Press.

摘要

尽管在过去几十年里,人们对性别与讨价还价竞争力之间的关系进行了大量研究,但得出的结论却寥寥无几。通过元分析综述,对62篇关于二元讨价还价互动中性别与竞争行为关系的研究报告结果进行了考察。平均加权效应大小表明,女性在谈判中似乎比男性表现得更具合作性,但这种差异很细微。结果表明,谈判者所受的限制(由抽象的讨价还价范式和沟通限制所施加)会减少谈判行为中的性别差异。当与采用“以牙还牙”讨价还价策略的对手竞争时,女性比男性更具竞争力。版权所有1998年学术出版社。

相似文献

1
Gender and Negotiator Competitiveness: A Meta-analysis.性别与谈判者竞争力:一项元分析
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1998 Oct;76(1):1-29. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2797.
2
Negotiator Risk: Sources of Uncertainty and the Impact of Reference Points on Negotiated Agreements.谈判者风险:不确定性来源及参考点对谈判协议的影响
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1998 Nov;76(2):89-112. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2800.
3
He, She, "They" at the Bargaining Table… Woman, Man or Just Negotiators? A Critical Review on Gender Ideologies in Mixed-Gender Negotiations.谈判桌上的他、她、“他们”……女性、男性还是仅仅是谈判者?对混合性别谈判中性别意识形态的批判性综述。
Psychol Belg. 2020 Jul 28;60(1):236-254. doi: 10.5334/pb.523.
4
Negotiators' bargaining histories and their effects on future negotiation performance.谈判者的讨价还价历史及其对未来谈判表现的影响。
J Appl Psychol. 2005 Mar;90(2):350-62. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.2.350.
5
A meta-analysis on gender differences in negotiation outcomes and their moderators.关于谈判结果中的性别差异及其调节因素的元分析。
Psychol Bull. 2015 Jan;141(1):85-104. doi: 10.1037/a0038184. Epub 2014 Nov 24.
6
Face threat sensitivity in distributive negotiations: Effects on negotiator self-esteem and demands.分配性谈判中的面子威胁敏感性:对谈判者自尊及要求的影响
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2020 Nov;161:255-273. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.004. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
7
Stereotype reactance at the bargaining table: the effect of stereotype activation and power on claiming and creating value.谈判桌上的刻板印象反应:刻板印象激活和权力对价值索取与创造的影响
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2004 Apr;30(4):399-411. doi: 10.1177/0146167203261884.
8
Negotiator Consistency, Counterpart Consistency, and Reciprocity in Behavior Across Partners: A Round-Robin Study.谈判者一致性、对应方一致性和行为在合作伙伴之间的互惠:一项轮询研究。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2023 Jul;49(7):1071-1085. doi: 10.1177/01461672221086197. Epub 2022 May 1.
9
Zooming out on bargaining tables: Exploring which conversation dynamics predict negotiation outcomes.从谈判桌看大局:探讨哪些对话动态可预测谈判结果。
J Appl Psychol. 2024 Jul;109(7):1077-1093. doi: 10.1037/apl0001136. Epub 2023 Oct 12.
10
The dynamics of gender and alternatives in negotiation.谈判中的性别动态与替代方案。
J Appl Psychol. 2021 Nov;106(11):1655-1672. doi: 10.1037/apl0000867. Epub 2021 Jan 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation and psychometric properties of the Italian version of the .意大利语版本的……的验证及心理测量特性
Res Psychother. 2023 Feb 3;26(1):617. doi: 10.4081/ripppo.2023.617.
2
Gender differences in cooperation across 20 societies: a meta-analysis.20 个社会中的合作跨性别差异:一项荟萃分析。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023 Jan 16;378(1868):20210438. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0438. Epub 2022 Nov 28.
3
Gender Differences in a Risk-Reduction Model of Sharing.分享风险降低模型中的性别差异
Evol Psychol. 2021 Oct 1;19(4):14747049211030205. doi: 10.1177/14747049211030205.
4
An experimental look at trust, bargaining, and public goods in fishing communities.对渔业社区中信任、讨价还价和公共物品的实验研究。
Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 21;11(1):20798. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-00145-5.
5
He, She, "They" at the Bargaining Table… Woman, Man or Just Negotiators? A Critical Review on Gender Ideologies in Mixed-Gender Negotiations.谈判桌上的他、她、“他们”……女性、男性还是仅仅是谈判者?对混合性别谈判中性别意识形态的批判性综述。
Psychol Belg. 2020 Jul 28;60(1):236-254. doi: 10.5334/pb.523.
6
Friends, Lovers or Nothing: Men and Women Differ in Their Perceptions of Sex Robots and Platonic Love Robots.朋友、恋人还是无关紧要:男性和女性对性爱机器人和柏拉图式爱情机器人的认知存在差异。
Front Psychol. 2020 Mar 13;11:355. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00355. eCollection 2020.
7
Data sharing as social dilemma: Influence of the researcher's personality.作为社会困境的数据共享:研究者个性的影响
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 17;12(8):e0183216. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183216. eCollection 2017.
8
Money Affects Theory of Mind Differently by Gender.金钱对心理理论的影响因性别而异。
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 3;10(12):e0143973. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143973. eCollection 2015.
9
The mediating effect of gaming motivation between psychiatric symptoms and problematic online gaming: an online survey.精神症状与网络成瘾问题之间游戏动机的中介作用:一项在线调查
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Apr 7;17(4):e88. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3515.
10
Gender differences in emotional responses to cooperative and competitive game play.在对合作与竞争游戏玩法的情绪反应上的性别差异。
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 1;9(7):e100318. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100318. eCollection 2014.