Coakley J H, Nagendran K, Yarwood G D, Honavar M, Hinds C J
Department of Intensive Care, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London, UK.
Intensive Care Med. 1998 Aug;24(8):801-7. doi: 10.1007/s001340050669.
To describe the various patterns of neurophysiological abnormalities which may complicate prolonged critical illness and identify possible aetiological factors.
Prospective case series of neurophysiological studies, severity of illness scores, organ failures, drug therapy and hospital outcome. Some patients also had muscle biopsies.
General intensive care unit (ICU) in a University Hospital.
Forty-four patients requiring intensive care unit stay of more than 7 days. The median age was 60 (range 27-84 years), APACHE II score 19 (range 8-33), organ failures 3 (range 1-6), and mortality was 23%.
Seven patients had normal neurophysiology (group I), 4 had a predominantly sensory axonal neuropathy (group II), 11 had motor syndromes characterised by markedly reduced compound muscle action potentials and sensory action potentials in the normal range (group III) and 19 had combinations of motor and sensory abnormalities (group IV). Three patients had abnormal studies but could not be classified into the above groups (group V). All patients had normal nerve conduction velocities. Electromyography revealed evidence of denervation in five patients in group III and five in group IV. There was no obvious relationship between the pattern of neurophysiological abnormality and the APACHE II score, organ failure score, the presence of sepsis or the administration of muscle relaxants and steroids. A wide range of histological abnormalities was seen in the 24 patients who had a muscle biopsy; there was no clear relationship between these changes and the neurophysiological abnormalities, although histologically normal muscle was only found in patients with normal neurophysiology. Only three of the eight patients from group III in whom muscle biopsy was performed had histological changes compatible with myopathy.
Neurophysiological abnormalities complicating critical illness can be broadly divided into three types -- sensory abnormalities alone, a pure motor syndrome and a mixed motor and sensory disturbance. The motor syndrome could be explained by an abnormality in the most distal portion of the motor axon, at the neuromuscular junction or the motor end plate and, in some cases, by inexcitable muscle membranes or extreme loss of muscle bulk. The mixed motor and sensory disturbance which is characteristic of 'critical illness polyneuropathy' could be explained by a combination of the pure motor syndrome and the mild sensory neuropathy. More precise identification of the various neurophysiological abnormalities and aetiological factors may lead to further insights into the causes of neuromuscular weakness in the critically ill and ultimately to measures for their prevention and treatment.
描述可能使延长的危重病复杂化的各种神经生理异常模式,并确定可能的病因因素。
神经生理研究、疾病严重程度评分、器官功能衰竭、药物治疗和医院结局的前瞻性病例系列。部分患者还进行了肌肉活检。
大学医院的综合重症监护病房(ICU)。
44例需要在重症监护病房停留超过7天的患者。中位年龄为60岁(范围27 - 84岁),急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE II)评分为19分(范围8 - 33分),器官功能衰竭3个(范围1 - 6个),死亡率为23%。
7例患者神经生理正常(I组),4例主要为感觉轴索性神经病(II组),11例有运动综合征,其特征为复合肌肉动作电位明显降低而感觉动作电位在正常范围(III组),19例有运动和感觉异常的组合(IV组)。3例患者检查异常但无法归入上述组(V组)。所有患者神经传导速度均正常。肌电图显示III组5例和IV组5例有失神经证据。神经生理异常模式与APACHE II评分、器官功能衰竭评分、脓毒症的存在或肌肉松弛剂和类固醇的使用之间无明显关系。在24例进行肌肉活检的患者中观察到广泛的组织学异常;这些变化与神经生理异常之间无明确关系,尽管仅在神经生理正常的患者中发现组织学正常的肌肉。在进行肌肉活检的III组8例患者中,只有3例有与肌病相符的组织学改变。
使危重病复杂化的神经生理异常可大致分为三种类型——单纯感觉异常、纯运动综合征以及运动和感觉混合障碍。运动综合征可由运动轴突最远端、神经肌肉接头或运动终板的异常解释,在某些情况下,可由不可兴奋的肌膜或肌肉量极度减少解释。“危重病性多发性神经病”特有的运动和感觉混合障碍可由纯运动综合征和轻度感觉神经病的组合解释。对各种神经生理异常和病因因素的更精确识别可能会进一步深入了解危重病患者神经肌肉无力的原因,并最终找到预防和治疗措施。