Suppr超能文献

万古霉素间歇输注与持续输注给药对耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌和粪肠球菌杀菌活性的比较

Comparison of bactericidal activities of intermittent and continuous infusion dosing of vancomycin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecalis.

作者信息

Klepser M E, Patel K B, Nicolau D P, Quintiliani R, Nightingale C H

机构信息

College of Pharmacy, University of Iowa, Iowa City 52242-1112, USA.

出版信息

Pharmacotherapy. 1998 Sep-Oct;18(5):1069-74.

PMID:9758317
Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To describe the pharmacokinetic profiles of vancomycin administered by continuous infusion and intermittent dosing and compare the duration of activity of the regimens.

DESIGN

Randomized, open-label, crossover study.

SETTING

Clinical research center at an academic medical center.

SUBJECTS

Twelve healthy, nonpregnant volunteers age 27.6 +/- 2.3 years.

INTERVENTION

Subjects received the following intravenous vancomycin regimens: 1 g every 12 hours; 2 g continuous infusion over 24 hours; and 1 g continuous infusion over 24 hours. Dosages were administered with and without gentamicin 2 mg/kg.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Serum samples were collected, drug concentrations determined, and bactericidal activity measured against two isolates each of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecalis. Subjects had poor tolerability for continuous infusions. Trough concentration for the intermittent regimen was 5.5 +/- 1.9 mg/ml, and steady-state concentrations were 8.8 +/- 1.6 and 16.9 +/- 1.9 mg/ml for 1 and 2 g continuous infusions, respectively. In general, all regimens provided bactericidal activity throughout the study interval. Against one isolate of E. faecalis, 2 g continuous infusion plus gentamicin provided cidal activity for a significantly greater percentage of the dosing interval (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Continuous infusion does not greatly improve the activity of vancomycin and should not be routinely administered. However, it may prove useful against isolates with reduced susceptibility to the agent.

摘要

研究目的

描述万古霉素持续输注和间歇给药的药代动力学特征,并比较两种给药方案的抗菌活性持续时间。

设计

随机、开放标签、交叉研究。

地点

一所学术医疗中心的临床研究中心。

受试者

12名年龄为27.6±2.3岁的健康非孕志愿者。

干预措施

受试者接受以下静脉注射万古霉素方案:每12小时1g;24小时持续输注2g;24小时持续输注1g。给药时同时使用或不使用2mg/kg庆大霉素。

测量指标及主要结果

采集血清样本,测定药物浓度,并针对耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌和粪肠球菌的各两个分离株测量杀菌活性。受试者对持续输注的耐受性较差。间歇给药方案的谷浓度为5.5±1.9mg/ml,1g和2g持续输注的稳态浓度分别为8.8±1.6mg/ml和16.9±1.9mg/ml。总体而言,所有给药方案在整个研究期间均具有杀菌活性。对于一株粪肠球菌,2g持续输注加庆大霉素在给药间隔的显著更大比例时间内具有杀菌活性(p<0.001)。

结论

持续输注并不能显著提高万古霉素的活性,不应常规使用。然而,对于对该药物敏感性降低的分离株,持续输注可能证明是有用的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验