Mackowiak P A
Medical Care Clinical Center, Maryland Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Baltimore 21201, USA.
Arch Intern Med. 1998 Sep 28;158(17):1870-81. doi: 10.1001/archinte.158.17.1870.
If asked to define fever, most physicians would offer a thermal definition, such as "fever is a temperature greater than...." In offering their definition, many would ignore the importance of the anatomic site at which temperature measurements are taken, as well as the diurnal oscillations that characterize body temperature. If queried about the history of clinical thermometry, few physicians could identify the source or explain the pertinacity of the belief that 98.6 degrees F (37.0 degrees C) has special meaning vis-à-vis normal body temperature. Fewer still could cite the origin of the thermometer or trace the evolution of modern concepts of clinical thermometry. Although many would have some knowledge of the fundamentals of thermoregulation and the role played by exogenous and endogenous pyrogens in the induction of fever, few would have more than a superficial knowledge of the broad biological activities of pyrogenic cytokines or know of the existence of an equally complex and important system of endogenous cryogens. A distinct minority would appreciate the obvious paradoxes inherent in an enlarging body of data concerned with the question of fever's adaptive value. The present review considers many of these issues in the light of current data.
如果被要求给发热下定义,大多数医生会给出一个热学定义,比如“发热是体温高于……”。在给出他们的定义时,许多人会忽略测量体温的解剖部位的重要性,以及作为体温特征的昼夜波动。如果被问及临床体温测量的历史,很少有医生能说出其来源,或者解释认为华氏98.6度(37.0摄氏度)对于正常体温有特殊意义这一观念的顽固性。能说出体温计起源或追溯现代临床体温测量概念演变的人更少。尽管许多人对体温调节的基本原理以及外源性和内源性致热原在发热诱导中所起的作用有所了解,但很少有人对致热细胞因子广泛的生物学活性有深入的了解,或者知道同样复杂且重要的内源性制冷剂系统的存在。极少数人能认识到与发热适应性价值问题相关的大量数据中固有的明显矛盾。本综述根据当前数据对其中许多问题进行了探讨。