Mukherjee J, Kozel T R, Casadevall A
Department of Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461, USA.
J Immunol. 1998 Oct 1;161(7):3557-68.
Epitope specificity and isotype influence mAb efficacy against Cryptococcus neoformans; however, the relative contribution of each attribute is poorly understood. To date, only mAbs that recognize two epitopes of capsular glucuronoxylomannan (GXM), defined by the IgG1 mAbs 2H1 and E1, consistently mediate protection against C. neoformans. The role of epitope specificity was further examined using six additional IgG1 mAbs and serotype D C. neoformans ATCC 24067. mAbs 3C2, 439, and 471 recognize the 2H1 epitope, whereas mAbs 339, 1255, and 302 recognize two separate epitopes. mAbs 3C2, 439, and 471 competed for GXM with the IgA mAb 18G9, a 2H1 mAb family member, whereas mAbs 302, 339, and 1255 did not. Each mAb bound GXM similarly, as determined by agglutination, direct Ag binding, Ag inhibition, and indirect capsular immunofluorescence assays. mAb apparent affinity constants for GXM ranged from 5 to 26 x 10(7) M(-1) with mAb 1255 > 3C2 > 339 > 439 > 471 > 302. Each mAb significantly prolonged survival (p < 0.05); the average survival times of control and mice passively immunized with mAbs 3C2, 302, 339, 439, 471, and 1255 were 10.8, 36.6, 33, 25.5, 24.9, 17, and 22.6 days, respectively. Although each mAb enhanced J774.16 cell fungicidal activity, differences were observed in the ability of each mAb to facilitate attachment and ingestion of cryptococci. These results indicate 1) two additional epitope specificities associated with mAb efficacy, 2) differences in opsonic and protective efficacy for IgG1 anti-GXM mAbs, 3) an association between affinity and protective efficacy, and 4) additional support for association between an annular indirect capsular immunofluorescence pattern and mAb efficacy.
表位特异性和抗体类型影响单克隆抗体抗新型隐球菌的效力;然而,对每个属性的相对贡献了解甚少。迄今为止,只有识别由IgG1单克隆抗体2H1和E1定义的荚膜葡糖醛酸木聚糖(GXM)两个表位的单克隆抗体始终介导对新型隐球菌的保护作用。使用另外六种IgG1单克隆抗体和血清型D新型隐球菌ATCC 24067进一步研究了表位特异性的作用。单克隆抗体3C2、439和471识别2H1表位,而单克隆抗体339、1255和302识别两个不同的表位。单克隆抗体3C2、439和471与IgA单克隆抗体18G9(2H1单克隆抗体家族成员)竞争GXM,而单克隆抗体302、339和1255则不竞争。通过凝集、直接抗原结合、抗原抑制和间接荚膜免疫荧光测定确定,每种单克隆抗体与GXM的结合相似。单克隆抗体对GXM的表观亲和常数范围为5至26×10⁷ M⁻¹,其中单克隆抗体1255>3C2>339>439>471>302。每种单克隆抗体均显著延长了生存期(p<0.05);对照组以及用单克隆抗体3C2、302、339、439、471和1255被动免疫的小鼠的平均生存时间分别为10.8、36.6、33、25.5、24.9、17和22.6天。尽管每种单克隆抗体均增强了J774.16细胞的杀真菌活性,但在每种单克隆抗体促进隐球菌附着和摄取的能力方面观察到差异。这些结果表明:1)与单克隆抗体效力相关的另外两种表位特异性;2)IgG1抗GXM单克隆抗体在调理和保护效力方面的差异;3)亲和力与保护效力之间的关联;4)对环状间接荚膜免疫荧光模式与单克隆抗体效力之间关联的进一步支持。